Ok. So just exactly what is your point? It certainly hasn't been a politically unbiased one. That much we clearly know.i think you just agreed with my original point
Ok. So just exactly what is your point? It certainly hasn't been a politically unbiased one. That much we clearly know.i think you just agreed with my original point
I don't think you've been paying attention, what I believe is that I am paying my hard earned tax dollars for politicians to grand stand and play reindeer games
congress has a right to exercise oversight they do not have a right to go on fishing expeditions for political gain
Ok. So just exactly what is your point? It certainly hasn't been a politically unbiased one. That much we clearly know.
Talk about laying off the weed. There you are answering your own posts.This is the one you started off disagreeing with just to later say the same dang thing. lay off the weed.
Talk about laying off the weed. There you are answering your own posts.
Perhaps if I was a faithful follower of brother John Birch, belonged to the Anitoch Baptist Church and had the stars and bars nailed up along side my garage you'd understand. But because I do nothing of the sort then unfortunately despite my best efforts nothing I say will ever make sense to you.you make no sense. but then you never have
Perhaps if I was a faithful follower of brother John Birch, belonged to the Anitoch Baptist Church and had the stars and bars nailed up along side my garage you'd understand. But because I do nothing of the sort then unfortunately despite my best efforts nothing I say will ever make sense to you.
Another one flies over the cuckoo nest.Perhaps if I was a faithful follower of brother John Birch, belonged to the Anitoch Baptist Church and had the stars and bars nailed up along side my garage you'd understand. But because I do nothing of the sort then unfortunately despite my best efforts nothing I say will ever make sense to you.
C'mon NewfMan... you don't understand the elite philosophy of the left despite the best effort to lower themselves so you will understand?your consistently nonsensical. were you trying to prove my point?
Perhaps if I was a faithful follower of brother John Birch, belonged to the Anitoch Baptist Church and had the stars and bars nailed up along side my garage you'd understand. But because I do nothing of the sort then unfortunately despite my best efforts nothing I say will ever make sense to you.
That's really why we will never understand you Mister Randle McMurphy!Another one flies over the cuckoo nest.
Prove your point? When you come up with one let me know. I'll take a look at it.your consistently nonsensical. were you trying to prove my point?
I guess these idiots aren't familiar with Charlie Daniels.
Now take that back and I won't tell anyone you drink horse piss.They're more familiar with Jack Daniels. If you consume enough of it, Trump makes sense. About a fifth per hour is what it takes to decipher MAGA "logic".
A might aggressive, and filled with ad hominems.You're better than that. Respond to each of us individually. I made my response regarding the Mueller report.
Exactly what was Barr's lie? State your claim now. I've read your types claims for over two years, none have been proven to be true.
Put yerass on the line, state your claim. Is that understood or can I be clearer? If I need to be clearer, I'm sure I can. Got that?
I am very aggressive, I agree, That said, What were Barr's lies? We both know why no response will be forthcoming.A might aggressive, and filled with ad hominems.
No response is warranted beyond this.
You are not better than this, and prove it with every post.
I am very aggressive, I agree, That said, What were Barr's lies? We both know why no response will be forthcoming.
It isn't because you didn't like my tone, it is because you have no rebuttal based in fact.
Nice try though.
How have you been, I've missed you.
-
I read it for myself, if you like we can both open it up and I'll be glad to give you my analysis of anything you ask.So far, we essentially have the "Fox and Friends" version of the Mueller Report. Do you disagree that Congress has oversight powers on this matter, and that the report unquestionably clears Trump from obstruction?
The whole idea of checks and balances hangs over the precipice right now. Of course you want your guy "exonerated" and "totally cleared"...that's understandable. But that isn't what happened. Your guy was barely cleared of collusion, and NOT cleared of obstruction, except by a hand-picked AG whose view of executive power exactly agrees with Trump because Trump hand-picked him for that very reason. Not only suspect, but legally questionable at best.
Let Mueller testify, and let the House Judiciary see the un-redacted report so they can DO THEIR JOB, as intended by the Founding Fathers as a check against abuses of executive power.
I realize that the only research you've done is to watch Hannity, but Trump clearly obstructed, and he set it up so he'd have an AG who'd "protect" him, which isn't the AG's job. The AG is supposed to be for the people, not the president's personal defense attorney. This clown circus only gets more entertaining every day, but the Head Clown has run his course and isn't entertaining anymore...he's become PennyWise, a dangerous clown. Time to change staff and have a white-haired born-again clown running the show.
Sekulow, Barr, and Giuliani, liars and cheats at-law.