T
Turdferguson
Guest
Giving names is a violation of TOSWho is your guy?
Giving names is a violation of TOSWho is your guy?
Political ? You mean the issues that are germane to that local. Like being paid for long waits to and from the parking. Sometimes 45 minutes. Do you work for freeWhen a local that has 9000 people (Local 89) can hold up a contract for the rest of the 500,000 members for political reasons then there's obviously a dysfunction. Thats not democracy it's extorsion.
He would be a political fugue.Giving names is a violation of TOS
So basically you are trying to say? You got wanted and screw the rest of us?When a local that has 9000 people (Local 89) can hold up a contract for the rest of the 500,000 members for political reasons then there's obviously a dysfunction. Thats not democracy it's extorsion.
During the negotiations for the first round of the supplement getting bogged down s was demanding paid cel phones for all his member and to be paid once the reached the parking lot. These are just some of his demands.
I didn't know posting the name of a known political figure was a TOS violation. Which your excuse is BS.Giving names is a violation of TOS
That was local 89's issues.Cell phones?? I wouldn't want ups paying my cell phone bill? Would only set a new procedure to track who I'm calling and texting during work hours. That's a really bad idea.
Some of us have to walk 5-10 minutes to get to our lockers from the parking lot everyday. I wish we had a shuttle or snowy and rainy days.
I hope you had more serious issues!!! ??? Who the majority of employees there full time or part time?
Last car I bought at the dealership, we started negotiating about $8000 apart.During the negotiations for the first round of the supplement getting bogged down s was demanding paid cel phones for all his member and to be paid once the reached the parking lot. These are just some of his demands.
How was UPS going to lose customers?So how long should that politcal game go on? Till UPS loses customers and members get laid off? The E Board had the right to do it and they did. If you don't like it change the Constitution. I think they did the right thing.
That's just silly talk with all those facts and reality.How was UPS going to lose customers?
During the close to a year that we were at an impass and working under the old contract, UPS continued to record unprecedented profits in a supposed down economy.
Neither side ever filed the necessary paperwork for a work stoppage.
UPS was content to sit back and wait as long as necessary and probably knew all along that the IBT would step in and impose.
The fix was likely in from the beginning.
You're just blowing cigar smoke.
How was UPS going to lose customers?
During the close to a year that we were at an impass and working under the old contract, UPS continued to record unprecedented profits in a supposed down economy.
Neither side ever filed the necessary paperwork for a work stoppage.
UPS was content to sit back and wait as long as necessary and probably knew all along that the IBT would step in and impose.
The fix was likely in from the beginning.
You're just blowing cigar smoke.
How many people post on a Vote No Facebook page from those locals?It was obvious from the posts on that facebook page that most people in those locals (on that page at least) were holding out for healthcare and not for getting paid to commute to work or any other supplemental issue. All I remember was the constant posts about healthcare (which had already been settled in the national master agreement) and very little about other issues that were local issues. Sorry.....just calling it like I remember seeing it. I have no dog in this fight.
An obvious punishment for Fred Z and his perceived aspirations, at the expense of the members.
Shame on you Hoffa and Hall.
Do you even know what local 89's main beef with the supplement was?What? Shame on Z for holding all of us hostage for things that could have been dealt with through the grievance process.
What did you want in the contract that you didn't get?Why even bother voting on a contract. Let's just accept what they offer next time.
That's pretty much how you sound.
Pension issues. Full time jobs.. Not this reg temp crap they pull. For startersWhat did you want in the contract that you didn't get?
So if we went on strike to get local 89 there cell phones,what do you think ups existing customers were gonna do wait until we came back....why do you think FedEx was so excited they wanted that business....also you guys should think about striking as if you were the lowest seniority.....how would you feel if you got laid off and couldn't feed your families because local 89 wanted cell phones........you all should stop being me stersHow was UPS going to lose customers?
During the close to a year that we were at an impass and working under the old contract, UPS continued to record unprecedented profits in a supposed down economy.
Neither side ever filed the necessary paperwork for a work stoppage.
UPS was content to sit back and wait as long as necessary and probably knew all along that the IBT would step in and impose.
The fix was likely in from the beginning.
You're just blowing cigar smoke.
We wouldn't have gone on strike.So if we went on strike to get local 89 there cell phones,what do you think ups existing customers were gonna do wait until we came back....why do you think FedEx was so excited they wanted that business....also you guys should think about striking as if you were the lowest seniority.....how would you feel if you got laid off and couldn't feed your families because local 89 wanted cell phones........you all should stop being me sters