If the competition intended on shutting UPS down didn't they have a good opertunity(sp?) in 1997? Competion is there but can they really handle all the volume? I don't think so.
Back in '97 the competition was FedEx. They were not ready to handle the volume. Packages sat everywhere. UPS handled 6% of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP). FDX struggled with the service because they were busting at the seams. They were turning away the business because they couldn't handle it.
Here is the key: Customers did not have a choice once the strike was over. If they wanted their goods delivered they needed to come back to UPS.
We did not let them down and the Teamsters got behind the campaign to recover the volume.
Fed Ex did not have a solid network in place. Since '97, Fedex and DHL have the ground network and capacity to take most of the volume away. They may struggle initially but UPS will lose volume and more importantly the volume will not come back.
God forbid there is a strike...As the volume dries up, UPS will shrink the network quickly and if necessary let buildings sit. There will be mass layoffs. UPS will become a 3rd rate carrier.
This is a different world than what was around back in the last century. I think the Teamster strategy should be to get UPS to help in what ever way is legal and not hurt the company's reputation to level the organized labor playing field. Priority needs to see a massive organized labor campaign aimed at FedEx and DHL.
The Teamsters have not sold anyone out on this contract. This contract is a colaboration of efforts on both sides to protect each sides interests without losing market share in the transporation sector. Right now, the success of the Teamsters is tied to UPS. The leverage isn't there. If FDX and DHL were organized there would be a much different scenario!
Bottom Line: UPS is union and Fedex isn't - How long do you think you can go without feeling the pinch?