542thruNthru
Well-Known Member
maybe if you deliver in Oregon or San Fran it’s different….
maybe if you deliver in Oregon or San Fran it’s different….
95-98%................There exists the “Teamsters“ as a labor union and their exists the member….the rank and file members who probably 95-98% vote Republican. The Democrats are the party of the elitists. They want to demolish the working class, the middle class, and the hobbies and interests we have outside of work. Dems take the union vote, along with the minority vote for granted.
Not a bad idea to win both parties support although it might be a challenge. Why not try?Teamsters president faces backlash over ‘unconscionable’ GOP convention speech | US unions | The Guardian
amp-theguardian-com.cdn.ampproject.org
This whole planet sucks...flush it all away and let Mother Earth start over without stupid humans...Dude, they don’t all suck. I agree a fair number of them do. But I also would say a fair number of Republicans also suck.
I think this is an interesting subject. To continue to alienate the republic base of Teamsters, (which doesn’t make any sense, but I digress); O’Brien could limit his own political voting base.
Republicans typically don’t promote labor, but that doesn’t mean they wouldn’t. Maybe if the Teamsters stopped picking on them, they would pass some pro union legislation?
If the Republicans get their way there won't be any Teamster $100k to $175k jobs. What do you think RTW laws are all about?Great post…..how a Teamster who make $100-175k could ever vote for a democrat is beyond me. Are you all dems telling me that before your pcms you guys stand around and praise Biden/Harris/Soros? Different strokes for different folks I guess. Most of us stand around and talk about our guns, trucks, boats, freedoms, muscle cars and money and how we refuse to let the libs take them from us.
Do you REALLY think the Republicans will ever welcome labor?I think this is an interesting subject. To continue to alienate the republic base of Teamsters, (which doesn’t make any sense, but I digress); O’Brien could limit his own political voting base.
Republicans typically don’t promote labor, but that doesn’t mean they wouldn’t. Maybe if the Teamsters stopped picking on them, they would pass some pro union legislation?
You DO understand that the jobs to attain all of those things came from having union representation, right?Great post…..how a Teamster who make $100-175k could ever vote for a democrat is beyond me. Are you all dems telling me that before your pcms you guys stand around and praise Biden/Harris/Soros? Different strokes for different folks I guess. Most of us stand around and talk about our guns, trucks, boats, freedoms, muscle cars and money and how we refuse to let the libs take them from us.
All completely false statements. Thanks for your usual rhetoric.
You DO understand that the jobs to attain all of those things came from having union representation, right?
The “ libs” stand up for workers rights. The other side would love to see everyone making the bare minimum
I’m not certain what you mean by controlling our benefits. Whether we like it or not, the government controls pretty much all aspects of Union rules and regulations every pension has government rules They have to follow. and some pensions have been bailed out by the government.Not a fan of any of these characters.
However, unlike UAW President, shawn fain, who endorsed biden, stated...
“Look, let me be clear about this: a great majority of our members will not vote for President Biden. Yes, some will. But that's the reality of this: The majority of our members are gonna vote their paychecks. They're going to vote for an economy that works for them...”
...I give O'Brien credit for at least donating to and having a discussion with republicans.
That being said, the one thing that I simply cannot comprehend about unions is how they wish to abdicate much of their responsibility of negotiating what's best for its members to the federal government - who can't even perform a task as simple as balancing the the budget.
Seriously, do you want the federal government managing and/or controlling any of our benefits?
I believe Sean O’Brien believes he has the commitment of a core group of Republicans that will pass union friendly legislation.Do you REALLY think the Republicans will ever welcome labor?
a few months ago republican governors in six southern states banded together to keep the UAW out( Georgia used to have three automobile plants in Georgia that are represented by the UAW)
Republicans love low wages and no chance for the workers to stand up for them selves
A New York City real estate developer is pro labor? Please.You also need to understand the difference between pro Republican and pro Trump. Many of the guys in my building vote locally for Democrats but are supporting Trump because they feel he is more pro working class while the Democrats are the party of the bi-coastal white wealthy elites.
Dem party claims to be a friend to labor but in recent years that has been little more than lip service and talking points. The only unions they care much about are public employee unions that they treat as their own slush funds. They have done more to hurt private sector union jobs than Republicans. No justification for an automatic knee jerk response to support only Dems.I’m not certain what you mean by controlling our benefits. Whether we like it or not, the government controls pretty much all aspects of Union rules and regulations every pension has government rules They have to follow. and some pensions have been bailed out by the government.
Sure, it’s a double edge sword. It’s a game We absolutely have to involve ourselves with. Personally, I think Sean is smart thinking outside of the box. Saying one party is the only party that is our friend is only true if we never extend our hand and friendship first.
I would say the last 60 years of saying one party is our friend hasn’t been very productive for unions and there growth. We are only merely surviving. at worst it doesn’t work. At best we get a seat at both parties table. As with anyone trailblazing a new path, he will either be remembered as a genius sucker. But unlike most labor leaders, he will be remembered.
While Republicans openly vote for RTW laws to weaken labor Unions.Dem party claims to be a friend to labor but in recent years that has been little more than lip service and talking points. The only unions they care much about are public employee unions that they treat as their own slush funds. They have done more to hurt private sector union jobs than Republicans. No justification for an automatic knee jerk response to support only Dems.
He was a Dem then.A New York City real estate developer is pro labor? Please.