wilberforce15
Well-Known Member
It solves the problem of constant maintenance, lower performance, and poor reliability of gas vehicles.
It solves the problem of constant maintenance, lower performance, and poor reliability of gas vehicles.
Then for crying out loud, why does it keep hitting first responders?You cannot cover for how much ignorance I've had to cure in you.
4 billion miles, and safer than the average human.
You thought it needed to see lines. You thought it was programmed for situations. You thought it couldn't differentiate objects. You have no idea, even right now, what a neural network is or how it is trained.
It is safer around first responders than you. It is safer around pedestrians than you. And it's still a baby.
It doesn't.Then for crying out loud, why does it keep hitting first responders?
It's so good.....it takes a human to babysit it.....MOF can't take your hands off the wheel. Who would buy such a product?These are quite tangible. It gets in wrecks less often per mile. That is the end of the story.
It cannot think it's way out of all problems. That is correct. But it is already better at thinking out the problem than a human.
You guys demand it be perfect. That's retarded. It is better, and that is enough.
Yes, the humans are paying to be employed as trainers for the artificial intelligence.It's so good.....it takes a human to babysit it.....MOF can't take your hands off the wheel. Who would buy such a product?
Because the flashing lights confuse it.Then for crying out loud, why does it keep hitting first responders?
Full self-driving has not hit any first responders.Because the flashing lights confuse it.
Well, it turns out that everybody got silent after I corrected the 87th piece of fake news.This thread died like..........a dead battery.
Pimp it some more?
No we can’t, because it does. Very easy to look up.Well, I'm glad we can agree that full self-driving doesn't have a problem with hitting emergency vehicles, or just about anything else.
You’re just too hopelessly liberal for me.Well, it turns out that everybody got silent after I corrected the 87th piece of fake news.
Maybe that was the max?
Just post a single link, maroon. It will say autopilot. Not fsd.No we can’t, because it does. Very easy to look up.
You are the one who thinks you can have your own facts. You still don't know the difference between a garage door opener and artificial intelligence.You’re just too hopelessly liberal for me.
How many facts would you like. Here are screenshots of the articles. I don’t have time to teach you anymore, I’ll let you look up the articles yourself. It really is tiring proving you wrong over and over and over again. When are you going to get a clue? This isn’t hard. Common knowledge.You are the one who thinks you can have your own facts. You still don't know the difference between a garage door opener and artificial intelligence.
You don't know the difference between full self-driving and autopilot.
So you are just like those idiots who crash those teslas, by treating autopilot as if it were full self-driving. They did not pay for full self-driving. Then they let the machine go as if it had full self-driving.
So what you're saying is that I'm completely right and you're completely wrong, and that it has not run into any emergency vehicles? That there is no problem with running into those things as you said a dozen times?How many facts would you like. Here are screenshots of the articles. I don’t have time to teach you anymore, I’ll let you look up the articles yourself. It really is tiring proving you wrong over and over and over again. When are you going to get a clue? This isn’t hard. Common knowledge.