The big topic of discussion lately has been reducing turnover. I'm not sure why so many seem to think we want to increase it. New hire turnover cost my district almost a million last quarter. They want less turnover, not more.
I am curious to what the "COST" is.
UPS doesn't do drug tests.
UPS doesn't do background checks.
They advertise a little, have a group of people walk the building.
those who come back get hired.
HR person gets paid the same....
Don't tell me the "paper work" or they should cut back on warning letters, lol.