Oh I understand it all right and once again your judging me on the basis of accusing me of not knowing when instead I have a different interpretation of it . An interpretation that you cannot disprove simply on the basis of your own opinion . That's right your opinion alone. Not on what some invisible person in the sky who to this point has said nothing or what some long deceased religious figure might have said who's actual existence is still not completely known or fully established.
Pope Francis says Catholic Church banning priests from engaging in sex is 'temporary' (On Topic Only)
- Thread starter Integrity
- Start date
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
That’s not a judgment that’s a fact. If I’m judging you, what penalty is there?
And I wouldn’t expect you to understand what being a Christian is when you’re not one.
Fact is you’re asking these questions from a position of dishonesty. You don’t want to know what the answer is because you’ve already decided, perfectly fine again, I can’t judge you and I can’t damn you. But what I can do is tell you you’re incorrect.
BrownFlush
Woke Racist Reigning Ban King
When man chose to sin, death entered the world .
It has killed billions.
allahuakbar
She/Her
Are they still allowed to molest kids? It’s just no sex?
BrownFlush
Woke Racist Reigning Ban King
You quote the left's favorite verse and you don't even know what it means.
Textual context is everything, infidel.
The Lord was referring to righteous judgement. Judge rightly. The way you know what kind of tree you're looking at is by judging what kind of fruit it bares.
Your fruit is so rotten, I can't tell.
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
You’ll have to ask the papelcy
Fred's Myth
Nonhyphenated American
So you trying to tell me that your accusation of my incorrectness is based on nothing more than your own self righteous opinion? LMAO. And now you claiming that my so called "dishonesty" is based on what?
As you stated that there is no penalty for judgement? Yet one of the most basic tenants of the religion you claim to embrace warns people about the dangers of judging others.
In addition you accuse me of NOT being a Christian. Who appointed you the moral arbiter of Christianity? Given that you are a so called Christian there is a strong possibility that you appointed yourself.
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
I’ll bet he’s a hoot at parties
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
There’s no penalty for my judgment, if I had any for you. It’s clear you don’t have very good reading comprehension.. you stated you’re not a Christian by the way and you talk about a sky god because you’re mock. Knock yourself out buddy keep on mocking.
Now back to your erroneous summary, of what being a Christian is, did the apostles, who are following Christ have an organized religion and worry about money and a building. Being a Christian simply means trying to follow in Christ footsteps the Bible does point out, It’s a good idea place yourself among other people trying to do the same.
Last edited:
So simply due to the fact that I talk differently, am capable of independent thought which is the bane of all religions and refuse to buckle under to the self righteousness of others including yours who think that their judgement is always the just and moral one does not mean that I am not a Christian , I'm just a nonconventional Christian. Therefore in your self righteous might are you going to say that I will never enter the kingdom of God?
I will never apologize for knowing the difference between faith and mind control.
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
You sound pretty proud and boastful
so non-conventional that you don’t even believe in Christ being risen?. OK knock yourself out. And when did I say you wouldn’t enter the kingdom of God? How would I know that again? I’m not the judge I’m sure a lot of people thought Saul would never enter either and then on the road to Damascus everything changed. I would hope the same for you.If you believe that your Christ rose from the dead, that's perfectly fine. Now whether I do or do not believe whether he did or did not rise or even existed at all is for me and me alone to decide. .You sound pretty proud and boastful
Now when the Mormon's and Jehovah Witness's come around I simply tell them this" " A mere mortal same as you and me succeeded getting you to believe what he told you. He then sent you out to my house unannounced and uninvited to try to compel me to believe what you were seduced into believing by a self appointed "messenger from God". And as a result that mere mortal not the universal being some call God now controls every aspect of your life, If you are convinced that you have a genuine need to be controlled in that fashion that's the choice you have made....but that's where it ends".
sailfish
Master of Karate and Friendship for Everyone
Communism.
Can you point to violence advocated in the New Testament?
Yes, communism. OK, that's a quasi religion.
ALL hotels? LMAO.
Not advocated violence. The recorded history alone speaks for itself But I noticed that you left out the Old Testament What are you trying to sell here? A redacted version of biblical history that leaves out the parts you don't want people to know about? You're as bad as old King Jim.
Does that cockeyed scheme include Social Security and Medicare, If it's a cockeyed scheme then why would ever entrust your future well being to this so called "cockeye scheme".?
