BrownFlush
Woke Racist Reigning Ban King
Get new material....wait..Don't cry trumpflake.
you're limited in your ability to communicate.
Get new material....wait..Don't cry trumpflake.
This kind of science could eliminate a decathalon champion!!!Looks like another CHOICE needs to be made.
"Consider the obvious problem of survival for individuals who allegedly possess a gay gene: individuals who have partners of the same sex are biologically unable to reproduce (without resorting to artificial means). Therefore, if an alleged “gay gene” did exist, the homosexual population eventually would disappear altogether. We now know that it is not scientifically accurate to refer to a “gay gene” as the causative agent in homosexuality. The available evidence clearly establishes that no such gene has been identified. Additionally, evidence exists which documents that homosexuals can change their sexual orientation. Future decisions regarding policies about, and/or treatment of, homosexuals should reflect this knowledge."
(via) A Scientific Examination of Homosexuality
and the “Gay Gene”
Brad Harrub, Ph.D. and Bert Thompson, Ph.D. and Dave Miller, Ph.D.
WTF is/was going on in VA back in the 70's and 80's?what is going on in Virginia, now the attorney general was wearing black face too
democrats dont care if itWTF is/was going on in VA back in the 70's and 80's?
Black Face Gone Wild?WTF is/was going on in VA back in the 70's and 80's?
I never quoted religious morals.Not everyone has these religious morals, don’t confuse them for science.
You're ignoring or don't comprehend the conversation.We all know women that are butch and men that are effeminate. It's a chromosome or gene out of whack. You don't chose to be homosexual any more than you chose to have anything else one could be born with.
Children can’t consent, men can. Gay sex isn’t comparable raping children. LolYou're ignoring or don't comprehend the conversation.
Not debating the 'choice' of being or not being born homosexual. The 'choice' comes when one decides to ACT on that identity, and whether or not doing so is justified.
If so, then a child molester can make the same argument.
I was going to eventually go there , but because of the ignorance, intentional or not, its hard to tell, and given the visceral of the reactions ..no way they could reason the pedophile into this.You're ignoring or don't comprehend the conversation.
Not debating the 'choice' of being or not being born homosexual. The 'choice' comes when one decides to ACT on that identity, and whether or not doing so is justified.
If so, then a child molester can make the same argument.
Jessie Jackson was on with Dana Perino speaking about the Virginia situation...….I couldn't understand a word he said.Black Face Gone Wild?
See @Fred's MythChildren can’t consent, men can. Gay sex isn’t comparable raping children. Lol
Jessie Jackson was on with Dana Perino speaking about the Virginia situation...….I couldn't understand a word he said.
That’s because you don’t reason and you approach this dishonestly. Just say homosexuality is against my religious teachings and I don’t condone it. That is the only reason I can see to argue against gays.I was going to eventually go there , but because of the ignorance, intentional or not, its hard to tell, and given the visceral of the reactions ..no way they could reason the pedophile into this.
They are to busy attacking anyone who would dare question the normalcy of homosexual behavior or consider any reasoning that would question it.
Please stop the religion card cry. You continue to use it and no one has.That’s because you don’t reason and you approach this dishonestly. Just say homosexuality is against my religious teachings and I don’t condone it. That is the only reason I can see to argue against gays.
Looks like another CHOICE needs to be made.
"Consider the obvious problem of survival for individuals who allegedly possess a gay gene: individuals who have partners of the same sex are biologically unable to reproduce (without resorting to artificial means). Therefore, if an alleged “gay gene” did exist, the homosexual population eventually would disappear altogether. We now know that it is not scientifically accurate to refer to a “gay gene” as the causative agent in homosexuality. The available evidence clearly establishes that no such gene has been identified. Additionally, evidence exists which documents that homosexuals can change their sexual orientation. Future decisions regarding policies about, and/or treatment of, homosexuals should reflect this knowledge."
(via) A Scientific Examination of Homosexuality
and the “Gay Gene”
Brad Harrub, Ph.D. and Bert Thompson, Ph.D. and Dave Miller, Ph.D.
That’s because it’s a stupid thing.Please stop the religion card cry. You continue to use it and no one has.
I noticed you never addressed this:
Of coarse it is.That’s because it’s a stupid thing.
Notice how you cut off my explanation of why it is an medieval view point of dismissing the possibility of a gay gene. It’s not scientific.Of coarse it is.
As well as any other challenge to homosexual behavior .
Medieval. LOLNotice how you cut off my explanation of why it is an medieval view point of dismissing the possibility of a gay gene. It’s not scientific.
Also let me see the link for the page you found that on, is it Jesus.org?