President Trump

[oldngray]

 

[Indecisi0n]

 

[BigUnionGuy]

 

[MrFedEx]

I just threw up....many times. It was orange.

 

[brownmonster]

The teflon brothers.

 

[Sportello]

Things are heating up. Prepare for crazy tweets.

It's a National Emergency.

Emergency, everybody to get from the street!

 

[Sportello]

Donnie John may be not doing so well this week.

 

[MrFedEx]

View attachment 242576

Don't come to any conclusions yet. Mueller did not clear Trump of obstruction, and Mueller team lawyers are saying now that Mueller might have been intentionally vague, as in leaving it up to the AG and/or Congress to make their respective determinations.

Since Barr is a political appointee, and wrote a 19 page opinion piece about how the president was immune from prosecution just prior to his appointment, one has to suspect that Barr was doing exactly what Team Trump expected him to do.

It is the responsibility of Congress to make the final determination.

 

[MrFedEx]

The teflon brothers.

Yep. Reagan wasn't a favorite of mine, but one of his turds had more integrity than the entire Trump family. My guess is that he would find Trump both repugnant and appalling.

 

[vantexan]

Don't come to any conclusions yet. Mueller did not clear Trump of obstruction, and Mueller team lawyers are saying now that Mueller might have been intentionally vague, as in leaving it up to the AG and/or Congress to make their respective determinations.

Since Barr is a political appointee, and wrote a 19 page opinion piece about how the president was immune from prosecution just prior to his appointment, one has to suspect that Barr was doing exactly what Team Trump expected him to do.

It is the responsibility of Congress to make the final determination.

Of course now that it's come out that it was a set-up by people in our various intelligence and law enforcement agencies to get Trump removed, there was really never a valid reason to investigate Trump to begin with. So was there obstruction? Not hardly. You have to have a legitimate investigation to begin with to obstruct it.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

Of course now that it's come out that it was a set-up by people in our various intelligence and law enforcement agencies to get Trump removed, there was really never a valid reason to investigate Trump to begin with. So was there obstruction? Not hardly. You have to have a legitimate investigation to begin with to obstruct it.

Nothing in your post is true.
Not surprising.

 

[vantexan]

Nothing in your post is true.
Not surprising.

It all true, you're in denial.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

It all true, you're in denial.

Keep chugging your koolaid, fact is nothing in your post is true. Gullible sheep like you will believe anything your fox news talking heads tell you.
Carry on.

 

[BrownArmy]

It all true, you're in denial.

Nothing in your post is true.

 

[vantexan]

Nothing in your post is true.

We'll see. You've already been wrong about Trump colluding with Russians. Gee, I wonder where that narrative started? When they all get indicted I guess the diehard faithful will still believe it was the Russians, not them.

 

[bbsam]

Of course now that it's come out that it was a set-up by people in our various intelligence and law enforcement agencies to get Trump removed, there was really never a valid reason to investigate Trump to begin with. So was there obstruction? Not hardly. You have to have a legitimate investigation to begin with to obstruct it.

Are you interested in seeing Mueller’s work or are you certain that since you believe it was erroneously begin, nothing is there?

Because if Mueller’s work is shown and Barr grossly misrepresented it, what does that say about Barr?

 

[oldngray]

If Mueller’s work is shown and Barr accurately represented it, what does that say about Barr?

 

[vantexan]

Are you interested in seeing Mueller’s work or are you certain that since you believe it was erroneously begin, nothing is there?

Because if Mueller’s work is shown and Barr grossly misrepresented it, what does that say about Barr?

You're telling me that if his work is misrepresented by Barr, that Mueller wouldn't hold a press conference and say so? Or one of his team, who are all Democrats, most of whom donated to Hillary's and other Democrat campaigns? Yes let's see the report, but let's also put out there that Barr is legally required to redact some of it. His hands are tied on that but that won't stop many Democrats from saying he's hiding something. But Lisa Page said under oath they had no real evidence against Trump when they started investigating him. So a special counsel was enacted with no evidence. So what exactly did Trump obstruct and how did he do it?

 

[bbsam]

If Mueller’s work is shown and Barr accurately represented it, what does that say about Barr?

Then we agree. Mueller’s work needs to be shown.

 

[bbsam]

You're telling me that if his work is misrepresented by Barr, that Mueller wouldn't hold a press conference and say so? Or one of his team, who are all Democrats, most of whom donated to Hillary's and other Democrat campaigns? Yes let's see the report, but let's also put out there that Barr is legally required to redact some of it. His hands are tied on that but that won stop many Democrats from saying he's hiding something. But Lisa Page said under oath they had no real evidence against Trump when they started investigating him. So a special counsel was enacted with no evidence. So what exactly did Trump obstruct and how did he do it?

How many press conferences has Mueller held?