Mueller and team are working on the redactions with Barr. So there's that.Fixed your factual mistake, and Mueller has yet to speak or have a full sentence of his report revealed.
Mueller and team are working on the redactions with Barr. So there's that.Fixed your factual mistake, and Mueller has yet to speak or have a full sentence of his report revealed.
If your intellect were longer than your nose you’d realize that taxes were the subject, not your other fantasies.Why are you under the impression the IRS investigates political conflicts of interest?
You're confused as usual.
If your head weren't completely up Trump's ass you would be able to follow a simple conversation.If your intellect were longer than your nose you’d realize that taxes were the subject, not your other fantasies.
Wow. Dumb x 30M. How much of it will he spend on himself? The hair has to be at least 10M.
AND! Who knows how many billions are in PACs supporting him.record war chest for a president. you know what that means , people love him and are showering him with support.
Mueller and team are working on the redactions with Barr. So there's that.I see an ignored member replied to me. Whatever he said is false, based on why he’s on ignore.
Citations needed.
Actually @newfie was partially correct, jurisdiction is a given in this case, however a successful prosecution is determined by evidence. He was 100% correct in the saying prosecutors do not absolve. A prosecutor chooses to move forward or not pursue charges or indictment in a case. This instance is different from a regular criminal procedure. This prosecutor was not presented with charges, he was presented with an open field to find something to charge, based on a notion.Fixed your factual mistake, and Mueller has yet to speak or have a full sentence of his report revealed.
I love it how you are eaten alive by Donald John Trump, your President, hell don't feel bad he's the Obama's, the Clinton's and mine also. Trump2020Wow. Dumb x 30M. How much of it will he spend on himself? The hair has to be at least 10M.
That is an example of why you clowns will lose. You see you guys are smarter than we want to be.
AND! Who knows how many billions are in PACs supporting him.
Wrong.Actually @newfie was partially correct, jurisdiction is a given in this case, however a successful prosecution is determined by evidence. He was 100% correct in the saying prosecutors do not absolve. A prosecutor chooses to move forward or not pursue charges or indictment in a case. This instance is different from a regular criminal procedure. This prosecutor was not presented with charges, he was presented with an open field to find something to charge, based on a notion.
The major problem that exists lies in where exactly did this notion come from and was this notion supported by truthtful information to the court (actually judges) that gave life to it. Complicated but not.