President Trump

[Operational needs]

https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1005595391612497920/vid/1280x720/nssXMp15pRtNtX15.mp4?tag=2

This is funny.

 

[oldngray]

 

[El Correcto]

No they did not and the debate about it from that time proves it. They took out the term maladministration because they feared impeachment would become politically motivated.

You only think otherwise because you have been misinformed by the liberal hacks you listen to. Learn some history.

Mason clearly stated, “If the president is being a jerk and the opposing party has a majority in the legislature, he should be impeached”.
Get rekt .

 

[It will be fine]

Mason clearly stated, “If the president is being a jerk and the opposing party has a majority in the legislature, he should be impeached”.
Get rekt .

“We’re going to have the people’s house bring articles of impeachment, then the State’s representative senators will make the final decision.”
“Oh dear God, they are basing their decisions on political motivations! We never could have imagined that!”
Hurr Durr

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

Mason clearly stated, “If the president is being a jerk and the opposing party has a majority in the legislature, he should be impeached”.
Get rekt .

Luckily Madison powdered his hand, pimp slapped that bitch into his place, and we ended up with independent branches of government.

 

[El Correcto]

“We’re going to have the people’s house bring articles of impeachment, then the State’s representative senators will make the final decision.”
“Oh dear God, they are basing their decisions on political motivations! We never could have imagined that!”
Hurr Durr

Are you sure they didn’t say the house gets to set them terms that the senate will follow during its decision making process?

 

[It will be fine]

Are you sure they didn’t say the house gets to set them terms that the senate will follow during its decision making process?

You’re a better troll than this. Just because I demonstrated how stupid your last argument was doesn’t mean you get to start crying about something else that didn’t actually happen.

It’s ok that Nancy forced vulnerable senators to go on record as to if they want witnesses at a trial or if they just want to orchestrate a cover up.

 

[BrownArmy]

It's true fren I'm sorry the liberal hacks on NPR filled your little brain with lies.

It’s like you suffered a head-injury.

What happened to you?

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

It’s like you suffered a head-injury.

What happened to you?

That's your second deflection post. I like how you're so brainwashed by liberalism you don't even bother trying to form coherent arguments anymore.
Orange man bad!!!

 

[El Correcto]

You’re a better troll than this. Just because I demonstrated how stupid your last argument was doesn’t mean you get to start crying about something else that didn’t actually happen.

It’s ok that Nancy forced vulnerable senators to go on record as to if they want witnesses at a trial or if they just want to orchestrate a cover up.

You forgot the part about a Supreme Court judge over seeing the senate’s trial.

 

[vantexan]

You’re a better troll than this. Just because I demonstrated how stupid your last argument was doesn’t mean you get to start crying about something else that didn’t actually happen.

It’s ok that Nancy forced vulnerable senators to go on record as to if they want witnesses at a trial or if they just want to orchestrate a cover up.

Nancy doesn't have the power to force anything in the Senate. What she has made clear is if this impeachment doesn't work she and the rest will look for other things they think they can impeach Trump on. If you think that's a winning strategy for 2020 go for it.

 

[El Correcto]

That's your second deflection post. I like how you're so brainwashed by liberalism you don't even bother trying to form coherent arguments anymore.
Orange man bad!!!

Hey now, I’ll have you know he is a libertarian.
Lol.

 

[oldngray]

The Dems latest "bombshell" Lev Parnas is walking around wearing an ankle monitor. They didn't call him as a witness in the House because it was a nothingburger.

 

[It will be fine]

You forgot the part about a Supreme Court judge over seeing the senate’s trial.

What about it?

 

[El Correcto]

What about it?

It’s a trial involving the highest judge in the land, the Chief Justice.

 

[It will be fine]

It’s a trial involving the highest judge in the land, the Chief Justice.

And?

 

[El Correcto]

And?

Why would they do that if it’s all meant to be a political process? Why get the judicial branch involved?

 

[Operational needs]

It’s like you suffered a head-injury.

What happened to you?

Ephipany?

 

[It will be fine]

Why would they do that if it’s all meant to be a political process? Why get the judicial branch involved?

The Chief Justice does very little. The presence of an old white guy in a bathrobe isn’t going to make the decision any less political. Any decision he makes can be overruled by a majority vote of the senators. They probably just didn’t want the judiciary to feel left out.

 

[Jkloc420]

The Chief Justice does very little. The presence of an old white guy in a bathrobe isn’t going to make the decision any less political. Any decision he makes can be overruled by a majority vote of the senators. They probably just didn’t want the judiciary to feel left out.

you are right for a change