President Trump

[DriveInDriveOut]

He doesn’t say Presidents or other high officials working at their behest are above the law

Neither did the supreme Court.

You've been fooled by radical left media.

Just like they fooled you into thinking Biden's mental state was sharp as a tack.

Now they're distracting you with their latest lie.

 

[newfie]

As far as I’m concerned Obama killed a traitor. No problems for me there.

you didnt really answer the point of the post you responded to.

the dems lust for trump would also have put Obama's actions up for prosecution had the supreme court gone the other way.

 

[Next Day Err]

you didnt really answer the point of the post you responded to.

the dems lust for trump would also have put Obama's actions up for prosecution had the supreme court gone the other way.

Then charge Obama with murder for all I care. But nobody took that step.

 

[Thebrownblob]

Then charge Obama with murder for all I care. But nobody took that step.

Oh, so that makes it right? Your logic is perplexing.

 

[Next Day Err]

Oh, so that makes it right?

It makes it complicated. The dude Obama had targeted was a national security threat.

 

[Thebrownblob]

It makes it complicated. The dude Obama had targeted was a national security threat.

And he was an American who had a right to trial. Don’t complain with Donald Trump sends a drone to your house, you approved this kind of action by president. I didn’t.

 

[vantexan]

Then charge Obama with murder for all I care. But nobody took that step.

So you were glad he did it, now you want him charged? When you realized you have to give Trump the same consideration as president you suddenly changed your tune.

 

[Thebrownblob]

So you were glad he did it, now you want him charged? When you realized you have to give Trump the same consideration as president you suddenly changed your tune.

 

[vantexan]

It makes it complicated. The dude Obama had targeted was a national security threat.

Merrick Garland's DOJ circulated a memo about Catholics who observed the Latin Mass as being potential national security threats. Will we be droning everyone that's a threat to the state?

 

[Next Day Err]

And he was an American who had a right to trial. Don’t complain with Donald Trump sends a drone to your house, you approved this kind of action by president. I didn’t.

So what do you think of the high court granting immunity to Trump for anything deemed “official acts”?

 

[Next Day Err]

So you were glad he did it, now you want him charged? When you realized you have to give Trump the same consideration as president you suddenly changed your tune.

I understand why Obama gave that order in good faith to protect national security. I’m not crazy about it but I understand why the decision was made in good faith.

If Obama had been challenged in courts later I would have shrugged.

 

[Sportello]

Trump killed his sister.

Killing of Nawar al-Awlaki - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

 

[Thebrownblob]

So what do you think of the high court granting immunity to Trump for anything deemed “official acts”?

I think you’re making more of it than it is because it’s always been that way. Presidents don’t get charged. Grow up and quit pretending, you live in a fantasy land.

 

[Thebrownblob]

I understand why Obama gave that order in good faith to protect national security. I’m not crazy about it but I understand why the decision was made in good faith.

If Obama had been challenged in courts later I would have shrugged.

Who decides what’s good faith? You? lol.

 

[UnionStrong]

I think you’re making more of it than it is because it’s always been that way. Presidents don’t get charged. Grow up and quit pretending, you live in a fantasy land.

It was always, always assumed that the president enjoyed a certain amount of immunity. The left wing scumbags pushed the envelope and forced the Supreme Court to finally clarify it for all the idiots on the left. It’s just another sign of the commies trying to overthrow the constitution.

 

[Thebrownblob]

It was always, always assumed that the president enjoyed a certain amount of immunity. The left wing scumbags pushed the envelope and forced the Supreme Court to finally clarify it for all the idiots on the left. It’s just another sign of the commies trying to overthrow the constitution.

Yep, they asked for it and then when they didn’t get what they want, they throw a fit. Some decisions you just don’t wanna know. Now the truth is what it’s always been.

 

[newfie]

It makes it complicated. The dude Obama had targeted was a national security threat.

then take that american , arrest him and put him on trial.

 

[newfie]

So what do you think of the high court granting immunity to Trump for anything deemed “official acts”?

i think they clarified what has always been presumed to be in existence.

Imagine the family of Osama bin laden suing Obama for executing Osama bin laden in a court system in a heavy muslim area in grand rapids or Minni. theres where Jack Smith was trying to take us.

 

[vantexan]

I understand why Obama gave that order in good faith to protect national security. I’m not crazy about it but I understand why the decision was made in good faith.

If Obama had been challenged in courts later I would have shrugged.

But would you have given Trump the same consideration for the same decision? Based on the last 8 years I'd have to say no. That's the point of the SCOTUS ruling, that presidents can't be put in the position of second guessing everything they do for fear of prosecution. After all these charges against Trump do you want the Republicans to go after Biden in court about his decisions that got American citizens killed after he leaves office? Do you want to further divide the country with constant tit for tat charges?

 

[newfie]

If Obama had been challenged in courts later I would have shrugged.

If Jack smith got his way Obama could have been tried in a heavy red court system for murder .

kinda like the dems are trying to do to trump in multiple heavy blue court systems.