MAKAVELI
Well-Known Member
I knew you would.I've got to agree with your statement.
I knew you would.I've got to agree with your statement.
I'm impressed with your changing of my statement. You are quite persuasive. You lost and continue to lose, I'm content with the fact you know it.I knew you would.
No actually I'm not, I merely gave good advice on how to avoid being placed in her position.
The fact is it is her fault that the truth is not known. You keep calling her a victim, she has made allegations, and offered no proof. Pictures do not count unless they are a part of a police report.
To be truthful lets call her exactly what she is, an alleged victim. Didn't want to go anyplace close to this, but you guys couldn't accept the advice and agree that it made sense.
So here we are playing the blame game.
I blame her inaction as the reason no one knows the truth.
If the guy smacked her around do I blame her for that? Absolutely not.
The final fact is only two people know the truth.
I will note in the article she did name it "MY TRUTH," well truth doesn't work that way. Truth is truth, and it stands on it's own two feet for all.
That is unless the accused is a Democrat.
That's a helluva spin!
you sound like the "mypillow.com"guy now!!!!I knew you would.
Donald Trump was a New York City real estate developer. It's a wonder all his partners weren't charged with something at one time or another.not suprising.
the liberals who solely freak out about russia are probably the same ones who vote clinton and obama and these other fraud liberals.
Public CitizenVerified account @Public_Citizen
More than a quarter of Donald Trump's international business deals involve a partner who has been investigated, charged, or convicted of a serious crime.
i dont buy that.Donald Trump was a New York City real estate developer. It's a wonder all his partners weren't charged with something at one time or another.
"The levels of federal taxes and federal spending fluctuate from month to month, and it is not unusual—but not always the case—for the federal government to run a surplus in January."Feds Collect Record Taxes in First Month Under Tax Cut; Run Surplus in January
But tax cuts will cause a deficit, REEEE.
Like I said “REEEE”"The levels of federal taxes and federal spending fluctuate from month to month, and it is not unusual—but not always the case—for the federal government to run a surplus in January."
Hmmmm
"The levels of federal taxes and federal spending fluctuate from month to month, and it is not unusual—but not always the case—for the federal government to run a surplus in January."
Hmmmm