President Trump

DriveInDriveOut

Inordinately Right
And yet everyone does. A 6'8" solid 300 lb White guy enters the room. He might be the nicest guy in the world but I bet you're on the defensive. You see a guy like that and think of the oppression of 400 years.
WTF are you rambling about?
We all have built in prejudices that unfortunately are reinforced by some.
Some of us can recognize "built in prejudices" and choose to overcome them. Others choose to accept them and instead just bitch and moan about "political correctness", because apparently empathy and not being a D*bag is a bad thing somehow.
It's not only minorities that are discriminated against
So.... are you suggesting two wrongs make a right, or are you just deflecting?
some throw the words bigot, racist, etc around just a bit too easily.
Ok.
Doesn't apply here though.
She said she discriminates.
Cut and dry.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
WTF are you rambling about?

Some of us can recognize "built in prejudices" and choose to overcome them. Others choose to accept them and instead just bitch and moan about "political correctness", because apparently empathy and not being a D*bag is a bad thing somehow.

So.... are you suggesting two wrongs make a right, or are you just deflecting?

Ok.
Doesn't apply here though.
She said she discriminates.
Cut and dry.
What some of us object to is the self righteousness of the "politically correct", assuming they alone care about others and are quick to label anyone not spouting their ideology as a bigot, etc. Gets old.
 

DriveInDriveOut

Inordinately Right
What some of us object to is the self righteousness of the "politically correct", assuming they alone care about others and are quick to label anyone not spouting their ideology as a bigot, etc. Gets old.
Someone said they discriminated in housing.
You're just spouting garbage to deflect.
Again.
Gets old.
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
That’s what “statute of limitations” is all about.

so they're not charging him due to statue of limitations? that was silly.

this investigation was supposed to search for new unknown information . instead Mueller had to pull in old stuff on manafort and Flynn to try to make it look like he was doing something.

I guess he may have a few guys on lying but that's too easy when you interview hundreds of people.

then you'll brag about the Russian indictments which look like they are leaking like swiss cheese.

and then my favorite I heard on Cuomo this morning was the argument that Mueller can still have damaging information on Trump but has somehow been the only one in DC that can control a leak. that's not just chasing a unicorn but a pink one at that.
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
so they're not charging him due to statue of limitations? that was silly.

this investigation was supposed to search for new unknown information . instead Mueller had to pull in old stuff on manafort and Flynn to try to make it look like he was doing something.

I guess he may have a few guys on lying but that's too easy when you interview hundreds of people.

then you'll brag about the Russian indictments which look like they are leaking like swiss cheese.

and then my favorite I heard on Cuomo this morning was the argument that Mueller can still have damaging information on Trump but has somehow been the only one in DC that can control a leak. that's not just chasing a unicorn but a pink one at that.
Have you noticed that the one thing you haven’t said is, “But they are innocent!”?
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
Have you noticed that the one thing you haven’t said is, “But they are innocent!”?
Just came out that FBI agents who interviewed Flynn didn't think he lied. So you've got an investigator who's ruining people financially with perjury traps, yet some might be innocent after all, and he even indicted a company that didn't exist at the time of their alleged wrongdoing. This is what you're hanging your hat on? And still no Russian collusion, which was just a fabrication designed to bring down the president. IG's report is almost out, should be a dandy.
 

bottomups

Bad Moon Risen'
Just came out that FBI agents who interviewed Flynn didn't think he lied. So you've got an investigator who's ruining people financially with perjury traps, yet some might be innocent after all, and he even indicted a company that didn't exist at the time of their alleged wrongdoing. This is what you're hanging your hat on? And still no Russian collusion, which was just a fabrication designed to bring down the president. IG's report is almost out, should be a dandy.
What makes you think any IG report will be accurate and fair since it's coming from a corrupt FBI?
 
Top