President Trump

[floridays]

BBsam response to you
I don't and can't, but I told you Mueller's only way around complying with his order. The point is moot anyway. I'm sure he did care what was in the unredacted memo or else he wouldn't have asked. As it is the unredacted memo is an exhibit in the case, something you wouldn't understand the importance of however. You haven't read an article about it yet. Keep delivering packages.

 

[floridays]

Someone’s on tilt. Can’t make a reasonable argument so drop to personal attacks. Try to be less predictable.

No personal attack, just advice. I can serve legal fool's equally however. You up for it, join in, get yourself a dose of it.

 

[vantexan]

The Mexican judge.

Yes, Trump was wrong to attack him. But where is the independent office involved in any way with the Mueller investigation, other than Mueller himself, that's being attacked? You've got an FBI that's answerable to a Congressional oversight committee that refuses to comply with their order and turn over unredacted documents. The IG report will be interesting, and if it goes the way sources are saying it will, Trump ought to fire every last one impeding the Congressional investigation.

 

[vantexan]

Rod Rosenstein

Rod Rosenstein isn't independent. He's answerable to Congressional oversight and he's uncooperative.

 

[bbsam]

Yes, Trump was wrong to attack him. But where is the independent office involved in any way with the Mueller investigation, other than Mueller himself, that's being attacked? You've got an FBI that's answerable to a Congressional oversight committee that refuses to comply with their order and turn over unredacted documents. The IG report will be interesting, and if it goes the way sources are saying it will, Trump ought to fire every last one impeding the Congressional investigation.

C’mon

No independent body would comply with the likes of Nunes running his mouth at every opportunity.

 

[vantexan]

[/QUOTE]You don’t speak for Ellis either. And it’s just as likely Ellis is playing to the peanut gallery as he ever considered dismissing or having the case moved elsewhere. Probably didn’t even care what was in the unredacted memo.[/QUOTE]
Funny how you attack Trump and others attacking "independent" players but then attack a very well respected judge who's rendered over 1000 decisions in his career. Guess it really does depend on who's ox is getting gored.

 

[vantexan]

C’mon

No independent body would comply with the likes of Nunes running his mouth at every opportunity.

They aren't completely independent and they are required by law to comply with the Congressional committee charged with oversight. If you want to talk about running his mouth and grandstanding you have to look no further than Adam Schiff. Nunes is the very model of restraint compared to Schiff.

 

[bbsam]

They aren't completely independent and they are required by law to comply with the Congressional committee charged with oversight. If you want to talk about running his mouth and grandstanding you have to look no further than Adam Schiff. Nunes is the very model of restraint compared to Schiff.

Oh good lord! Restraint?!?

 

[bbsam]

You don’t speak for Ellis either. And it’s just as likely Ellis is playing to the peanut gallery as he ever considered dismissing or having the case moved elsewhere. Probably didn’t even care what was in the unredacted memo.[/QUOTE]
Funny how you attack Trump and others attacking "independent" players but then attack a very well respected judge who's rendered over 1000 decisions in his career. Guess it really does depend on who's ox is getting gored.[/QUOTE]
I’m not attacking the judge. He’s playing to the camera. That’s part of the game. And then he’ll let the prosecution move forward.

 

[vantexan]

Oh good lord! Restraint?!?

Compared to Schiff? Absolutely!

 

[vantexan]

You don’t speak for Ellis either. And it’s just as likely Ellis is playing to the peanut gallery as he ever considered dismissing or having the case moved elsewhere. Probably didn’t even care what was in the unredacted memo.

Funny how you attack Trump and others attacking "independent" players but then attack a very well respected judge who's rendered over 1000 decisions in his career. Guess it really does depend on who's ox is getting gored.[/QUOTE]
I’m not attacking the judge. He’s playing to the camera. That’s part of the game. And then he’ll let the prosecution move forward.[/QUOTE]
No, he's not. He gave Mueller the dressing down he deserved.

 

[It will be fine]

No personal attack, just advice. I can serve legal fool's equally however. You up for it, join in, get yourself a dose of it.

You called someone a jackass and threatened to pull their pants down. What exactly is that advice for?

 

[bbsam]

BBsam response to you
I don't and can't, but I told you Mueller's only way around complying with his order. The point is moot anyway. I'm sure he did care what was in the unredacted memo or else he wouldn't have asked. As it is the unredacted memo is an exhibit in the case, something you wouldn't understand the importance of however. You haven't read an article about it yet. Keep delivering packages.

Go feed your son. I ain’t swallowing your swill.

 

[floridays]

So you want to believe Ellis would simply leave that case open? C’mon floridays. Now you’re just being a teenaged idiot in love with his perceived intellect.

The clown responded, it's moot. you seem to think Mueller rules everything he doesn't. He knew he had to comply. Period, or get the appeals court to rescind the order. Guaranteed in the past two weeks they were in the court trying to get it rescinded. Why the secrecy in front of a federal district court judge? Why have they withheld it from the house
judiciary committee. Only questions.

 

[floridays]

You called someone a jackass and threatened to pull their pants down. What exactly is that advice for?

Well if you read the first sentence I think I said something to the effect of staying out of it. This is just off the top of my head about 2 hours later. I was referred to as a liar, and bottomups replied along the lines I was following the president. That is my best recollection without rereading. So the advice was to stay out of it. You've turned into jimmy two times now, do you want a bite at the substance we were talking about? I see bottomups left, give me your best shot.

 

[floridays]

Go feed your son. I ain’t swallowing your swill.

You're bs big guy, don't change my words again and call me a liar. I was on record long before your Mccarthy piece and the remedies to the order. Ellis isn't, and wasn't in the mindset to dismiss, if he was he would have initially. Anything you say to me can't bother me. I do take offence to being called a liar however. You got that sweetness?

 

[floridays]

Go feed your son. I ain’t swallowing your swill.

I've got 2 son's, they're grown they feed themselves, nice to know you're a spitter however.

 

[floridays]

Nice that you treat me better than you treat your own son.

I'll answer this in a pm, is that understood?

 

[bbsam]

You're bs big guy, don't change my words again and call me a liar. I was on record long before your Mccarthy piece and the remedies to the order. Ellis isn't, and wasn't in the mindset to dismiss, if he was he would have initially. Anything you say to me can't bother me. I do take offence to being called a liar however. You got that sweetness?

Then don’t lie.

 

[It will be fine]

Well if you read the first sentence I think I said something to the effect of staying out of it. This is just off the top of my head about 2 hours later. I was referred to as a liar, and bottomups replied along the lines I was following the president. That is my best recollection without rereading. So the advice was to stay out of it. You've turned into jimmy two times now, do you want a bite at the substance we were talking about? I see bottomups left, give me your best shot.

You just keep lying to yourself, we can see where that’s gotten you.