Ok, I'll quit with that. I'll go with make you look like a fool. The only problem with the fool scenario is it takes someone with knowledge to know when one is made a fool of. I don't really like calling people fools either. So long as it's good for you, it's good for me however.
And if he doesn’t toe the Trump line?
With everything that's come out from behind the scenes with Strzok and Page, as well as Comey giving Hillary a pass(was not questioned under oath, aides given immunity, interview not taped, exoneration letter written well before she was interviewed)we can't help but think that the fix is in to nail Trump on anything that could get him impeached. It's been a year, where's the impeachable offense?
It’s simple. You made foolish claims about Mueller having to comply.
His office is independent for a reason. Let's see what he has to say.
Every other time there is an “independent” that disagrees with the Trump people we get a predictable attack.
I understand that, I posted it. Where is the lie? McCarthy was not teaching a class in criminal procedure, you wouldn't understand you've never been there.
Try to keep up. Just because Rachel Maddow refuses to report it doesn't make it not so.
So you want to believe Ellis would simply leave that case open? C’mon floridays. Now you’re just being a teenaged idiot in love with his perceived intellect.
No tougher than you.
Well where are all my “funny” ratings then?!?
Really? Who are you referring to other than Mueller?
The Mexican judge.
Rod Rosenstein
No. McCarthy said clearly that if Mueller refused to comply then Ellis would dismiss. There is no mention of contempt or a stay.
I'm sure I screwed up in the whole transaction of replying but McCarthy doesn't speak for Ellis, and if Ellis wants the case to stay in his court he doesn't dismiss, Mueller would have to go to a higher court to get them to reverse his order. If that doesn't happen judges can sanction. The judge is in charge of his courtroom. Like I said previously, McCarthy was not teaching criminal procedure.[/QUOTE]
Someone’s on tilt. Can’t make a reasonable argument so drop to personal attacks. Try to be less predictable.
No, I didn't. I said he had two remedies, the first would be compliance, the second would be a motion to a higher court to have the order rescinded. That is what I said. If Mueller does not comply with the order, and does not have it rescinded by a higher court, he is de-facto in contempt. The judge then has sanctions which are available to him. You are a clown, you try and base your whole legal premise on one short article. Keep to delivering packages and soccer fields.
