I bet is management had to stay until the last driver was back the nonsense would stop just as quick.
Any driver on the 9.5 is to be out no later than 9.5 hours. (Until such time driver elects to no longer ne on 9.5)
If there are stops that do not get delivered, that is on Management for failing to have a 9.5 hour day on the truck.
If Management wants the remaining stops delivered, THEY will have to deliver them, (though grievances cannot be filed for Management working) not send another driver out, unless one who is not on 9.5 wants to deliver them.
Anyone else feel this is a good way to deal with the 9.5 issue?
I want to change it to 8Rumor has it they want to change 9.5 to 10-------they did say a big change was coming
Simple really. If a driver punches out before 9.5, then you have satisfied the request. If he punches out beyond 9.5 hours, then you have violated it. You see, all your technology and algorithms are just a guide. It’s not accurate when IE can blanketly manipulate time allowances. Work is calculated by weight x distance. It’s not stops or pieces. And there is no “maximum allowed distance restrictions”. There is no mathematical equations for time. But there is for work. The driver is guaranteed 8 but restricted to under 9.5. You have 1.5 hours of time to get that driver in and off the clock. Question, how long does a stop take?What is your formula for determining a 9.5 day?
Simple really. If a driver punches out before 9.5, then you have satisfied the request. If he punches out beyond 9.5 hours, then you have violated it.
Question, how long does a stop take?
It's almost as if we need divers that start at all different hours to elevate the over dispatching, 9:5, and 8 hour request issues.Any driver on the 9.5 is to be out no later than 9.5 hours. (Until such time driver elects to no longer ne on 9.5)
If there are stops that do not get delivered, that is on Management for failing to have a 9.5 hour day on the truck.
If Management wants the remaining stops delivered, THEY will have to deliver them, (though grievances cannot be filed for Management working) not send another driver out, unless one who is not on 9.5 wants to deliver them.
Anyone else feel this is a good way to deal with the 9.5 issue?
And that was my point. There was no way of truly answering because of so many variables. Management wants a magic button. Ain’t happening.They don't know. It's all just guessing at this point.
-Bug-
And that was my point. There was no way of truly answering because of so many variables. Management wants a magic button. Ain’t happening.
Quite simple really.What is your formula for determining a 9.5 day?
Hours worked is the only "formula".What is your formula for determining a 9.5 day?
I've always thought the current language was pretty decent. I would really really really like to see automatic triple pay after 9.5 hours instead of having to grieve every time though.Personally, I find the present language to have ample "teeth".....if you have the fortitude and the game to enact "the process"???
Here's what I see.....they want to inch their way to the edge of the cliff, while I am tasked to hold them up by their belt.Yep.
Just like it is now.
They don't know. It's all just guessing at this point.
-Bug-
Here's what I see.....they want to inch their way to the edge of the cliff, while I am tasked to hold them up by their belt.
....then when they fall off of the cliff, they want to blame me for "not communicating"?
My position is this, they dispatch, I execute.
The residuals are their's to deal with.
~Bbbl~™
They want us to tell them whether THEY will violate....Honestly that is probably the best way I've ever heard to describe it. At least in my building. They push the limit every time and when it fails they freak out like I did it on purpose.