542thruNthru
Well-Known Member
Telling everyone just like I did last contract.I'll save that for you young guys.
"Start putting away $20-$25 a week aside just in case. If nothing happens then go on a nice vacation with it."
Telling everyone just like I did last contract.I'll save that for you young guys.
And everyone will laugh at me when my old ass works this Saturday or two here and thereTelling everyone just like I did last contract.
"Start putting away $20-$25 a week aside just in case. If nothing happens then go on a nice vacation with it."
That's not why they're laughing at you.And everyone will laugh at me when my old ass works this Saturday or two here and there
I don't careThat's not why they're laughing at you.
Here in Iowa, we are a right to work state so if we have regular drivers that aren't paying dues, (which I know we do), they sure as hell can't force the pvds to pay dues.I know they do here, I can't imagine the union being stupid enough to allow scabs to work without getting their money.
They don't pay them hereHere in Iowa, we are a right to work state so if we have regular drivers that aren't paying dues, (which I know we do), they sure as hell can't force the pvds to pay dues.
Yep....Ok,
That just means they are seasonal drivers who are not REQUIRED to use thier own vehicles.
Nothing preventing them from voluntary using thier own vehicles.
There needs to be more language.
Good luck with that.Here, they are shutting volume to PVDs way before driver start time using non seniority seasonals.
So seasonals and PVDs are combining to deliver my stops 2 hours before I get out to my route.
I don't know about you, but even if it is just seasonal in a rental, I want to punch in and punch out early...Not the seasonal.
We need language in the master. Otherwise next year they will be starting the seasonals (pvds or not) 4 hours before our start and seniority drivers will continue to be out till 11 p.m.
Second sentence is most important. They aren't required to use but they also aren't required to work here. The ruling changes nothing imo.Ok,
That just means they are seasonal drivers who are not REQUIRED to use thier own vehicles.
Nothing preventing them from voluntary using thier own vehicles.
There needs to be more language.
Here, they are shutting volume to PVDs way before driver start time using non seniority seasonals.
So seasonals and PVDs are combining to deliver my stops 2 hours before I get out to my route.
I don't know about you, but even if it is just seasonal in a rental, I want to punch in and punch out early...Not the seasonal.
We need language in the master. Otherwise next year they will be starting the seasonals (pvds or not) 4 hours before our start and seniority drivers will continue to be out till 11 p.m.
Not in RTW statesThey do pay union dues, that's why the union allows seasonal employees.
Kind of hard to get employees to voluntarily pay Union dues for a minimum wage job with no benefits. Most could go to McDonalds and make more money. With benefits.In right to work states...
All of the PVDs are scabs.
Most of the part-timers.
Some of the drivers.
Cannot make them join or pay dues. Of course, when they are suspended, get in an accident, or are seriously injured they sure wish they signed up!
Thanks Bubblehead - that was an interesting read. Apparently, the decision was applicable only to 2019 and the remedies were referred back to the parties. It does create some precedence, I would imagine, but is only applicable to 804 and for 2019 peak season.Yep....
PVD Arbitration Decision 804
In the Matter of Arbitration Between: | | AAA Case No. 01-20-0005-00968 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF | TEAMSTERS, LOCAL 804, | Issue: Personal Vehicle Drivers | Union, | | Arbitrator: Elliot H. Shaller, Esq. and | | UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. | Date of Decision: September 15, 2021 ...docs.google.com
Good luck with that.
So the Teamsters couldn’t get out in front of this once they figured out it was only forThanks Bubblehead - that was an interesting read. Apparently, the decision was applicable only to 2019 and the remedies were referred back to the parties. It does create some precedence, I would imagine, but is only applicable to 804 and for 2019 peak season.
A better question would be why was this the only language added to the present CBA in regards to PVD's when they become an issue during the Peak Season of 2017?So the Teamsters couldn’t get out in front of this once they figured out it was only for
LU 804 and 2019
Who dropped the ball
Is the company arguing that PVD's are not employees but more like private contractors that we see all the time during Peak?A better question would be why was this the only language added to the present CBA in regards to PVD's when they become an issue during the Peak Season of 2017?
View attachment 361255
If you click on the link, you can read itIs the company arguing that PVD's are not employees but more like private contractors that we see all the time during Peak?
They argue that they are seasonal employees, but instead of renting them a U-Haul they rent their personal vehicles.Is the company arguing that PVD's are not employees but more like private contractors that we see all the time during Peak?
I would love to hear any stories of his that you're willing to share!Oh my goodness,
I saw your signature ... MPLS 1934
My dad was part of that strike/riot.
He worked downtown MPLS
Tear gas, busted heads...
He lost his job, but not his life.
Our strike at UPS in 1997 was very tame in comparison.