Racism rears its ugly head

Upsmule

Well-Known Member
If I check CNN or MSNBC, they eliminate stories altogether if the stories aren't liberally left leaning. I want the news, both sides. I just listened to Juan Williams.....he's not a republican conservative.


It's called propaganda. Pick your poison, ie kool aid. CNN or any alternative "news" source. Until news is produced by robots instead of people news will be biased. But robots are programmable also so....forget about it.
 

moreluck

golden ticket member
Oh, and I think this is what was going through Miley's head too.......after all, there are no brains in there.


This insane rant is courtesy of Aura Bogado, who is an editor at lib rag Colorlines and a contributor to the far-left The Nation:
Screen-shot-2013-08-27-at-1.47.04-PM.png


Maybe Mlley was admiring that big butt because she has none of her own.
 

moreluck

golden ticket member
Somehow he also managed to be armed and have a voter registration card, both of which should be illegal if he was a felon. Sounds like the voter registration card was phony as well-oh shock, fraud here too…
NEW HAVEN- Police arrested a 35-year-old New Haven man on gun charges among others after an allegedly unprovoked attack on a 71-year-old man.

Jorge DelaPaz was arrested on charges of assault in the third degree of an elderly person, carrying a dangerous weapon, carrying a pistol without a permit, criminal posession of a pistol and interfering with police.

Police say on Sunday, Aug. 25, the elder New Haven man was eating a hamburger in the Goffe Street Park following a Toni Harp mayoral campaign-sponsored event that afternoon when he was approached by the 35-year-old. Police say DelaPaz told the elder white male that he shouldn’t be “in his park where young black kids are playing”.

When the man refused an order from DelaPaz to pick up a football, DelaPaz punched the man multiple times in the face, knocking him to the ground. Police say several witnesses supported the victim’s account of the unprovoked attack.

Upon police arriving at the scene at around 3:40 p.m., DelaPaz fled the scene on foot. When he was apprehended, police say he resisted and injured the leg of a responding officer. After being detained, police found a Sig Sauger P239 handgun, a set of brass knuckles and a voter registration card in DelaPaz’s bookbag. DelaPaz gave multiple false names before his identity was determined. Police say DelaPaz is a convicted felon.
 

Babagounj

Strength through joy
You missed the part where he struggled with the officers , where they had to yell " TASER " several times until he stopped .
 

moreluck

golden ticket member
Via Newsbusters:
Memo to the Corrections Department at the Los Angeles Times: The following sentence is utterly unhistorical. “Since Democrats led the passage of civil rights legislation that marchers pushed for in 1963, Republicans have struggled to recover with black voters”.

Civil rights legislation of the 1960s was favored more by Republicans than by Democrats, so how did Democrats “lead the passage”? With three reporters contributing to the story – Kathleen Hennessey, Richard Simon, and Alexei Koseff – none of them could locate the actual Sixties voting record as they labored to make the GOP look bad for the Democratic unanimity of the event:

Republican politicians invited to the event passed on the high-profile platform to promote their vision of the civil rights landscape and their effort to reach out to black voters. House Speaker John A. Boehner of Ohio chose to speak at a congressional ceremony last month instead, spokesman Brendan Buck said. House Majority Leader Eric Cantor of Virginia had previously scheduled events in North Dakota and Ohio, an aide said.

Former presidents George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush could not attend for health reasons, their spokesmen said…
The absence of even a gesture of bipartisanship was a reminder of the enduring political legacy of the civil rights battles.

Since Democrats led the passage of civil rights legislation that marchers pushed for in 1963, Republicans have struggled to recover with black voters, leaving a stark racial divide in American politics.
 

moreluck

golden ticket member
Sanity prevails.
NEW YORK (AP) — A federal jury has rejected the argument that use of the N-word among blacks can be a culturally acceptable term of love and endearment, deciding its use in the workplace is hostile and discriminatory no matter what.

Jurors last week awarded $250,000 in compensatory damages to a black employment agency worker who was the target of an N-word-laced rant by her black boss, and they return to a Manhattan federal court Tuesday to decide on punitive damages.

The case against Rob Carmona and the employment agency he founded, STRIVE East Harlem, gave legal airing to what some see as a complex double standard surrounding the word: It’s a degrading slur when uttered by whites but can be used at times with impunity among blacks.

But 38-year-old Brandi Johnson told jurors that being black didn’t make it any less hurtful to be the target of what her attorney called Carmona’s “four-minute * tirade” about inappropriate workplace attire and unprofessional behavior.

Johnson, who taped the March 2012 remarks after her complaints about his verbal abuse were disregarded, said she fled to the restroom and cried for 45 minutes.
“I was offended. I was hurt. I felt degraded. I felt disrespected. I was embarrassed,” Johnson testified.
 

roadrunner2012

Four hours in the mod queue for a news link
Troll
Final votes, Civil Rights Act of 1964:

By party and region

Note: "Southern", as used in this section, refers to members of Congress from the eleven states that made up the Confederate States of America in the American Civil War. "Northern" refers to members from the other 39 states, regardless of the geographic location of those states.

The original House version:

  • Southern Democrats: 7–87 (7–93%)
  • Southern Republicans: 0–10 (0–100%)

  • Northern Democrats: 145–9 (94–6%)
  • Northern Republicans: 138–24 (85–15%)
The Senate version:

 

island1fox

Well-Known Member
What happened to the Civil rights Act of 1957 ?? The one that LBJ fought against ---until the sixties --when he realized -that control of minorities would lead to his power grab !!

Also JFK voted AGAINST THE Civil RIGHTS ACT OF 1957--until he realized in the 60 Presidential campaign --he needed the Black Vote !!
 
Top