Republican Rewrite of US Taxcode

[Jkloc420]

It hasn't been stashed. It was already taxed in the country it was made in. They carry on daily business in those countries. Why bring it back here just to be taxed again?

I agree

 

[Jkloc420]

They are outsourcing too many jobs.

um yea because it is cheaper, labor is cheaper

 

[DriveInDriѵeOut]

no the 9 trillion was under obama not regean

you're wrong man, just sayin

 

[IVE GOTTA PACKAGE 4U]

um yea because it is cheaper, labor is cheaper

No kidding. Give them a tax insensitive for keep jobs over here

 

[Jkloc420]

The corporate reductions are permanent.

yea on this tax bill, the ones bush did expired, not sure about regean or jfk

 

[UpstateNYUPSer(Ret)]

Give them a tax insensitive for keep jobs over here

Wu*?

 

[DriveInDriѵeOut]

Growth over seas. Don't lower the corporate tax rate. Give them a tax incentive for employees on the payroll.

They should definitely be cutting the payroll tax instead of corporate tax
Common sense has no place in this political environment

 

[BrownArmy]

no the 9 trillion was under obama not regean

It's funny that you think that's true.

 

[Jkloc420]

you're wrong man, just sayin

wrong about 9 trillion under obama, he came in at 10 trillion left at 9 trillion, one percent growth does nothing to control that

 

[bbsam]

No kidding. Give them a tax insensitive for keep jobs over here

You can't. That would be the state controlling the production. That's socialism.

 

[Jkloc420]

It's funny that you think that's true.

you want to take 2 trillion away, were say 7 trillion

 

[UpstateNYUPSer(Ret)]

They should definitely be cutting the payroll tax instead of corporate tax
Common sense has no place in this political environment

I disagree—-they should increase it and divert that portion only to shore up SS.

 

[Jkloc420]

you guys realize jfk cut taxes to right and the economy boomed

 

[floridays]

Probably a new widget for me to enjoy.

Great, I hope you enjoyed it. It was your choice where to spend your money, I'm fully behind that. The money did however go back into the economy and helped someone else. Your employees NO, someone else YES. Nothing wrong with that in my opinion. You have just demonstrated an example of micro economics.

 

[Jkloc420]

they are cutting small business taxes to but you have to figure out a way to seperate the indivudal tax from business tax

 

[BrownArmy]

wrong about 9 trillion under obama, he came in at 10 trillion left at 9 trillion, one percent growth does nothing to control that

You might be forgetting about Bush II, the Iraq war, his tax-cuts, etc.

Of course Obama added to the deficit, but he doesn't get all the blame.

 

[IVE GOTTA PACKAGE 4U]

You can't. That would be the state controlling the production. That's socialism.

No. Bring some of that tax money back over here. Most of these corporations are paying very little taxes anyways. Creative accounting. At least get a few tax dollars from the working Joe.

 

[DriveInDriѵeOut]

I disagree—-they should increase it and divert that portion only to shore up SS.

Uh, so you want future generations to pay for your decades of fiscal irresponsibility?
Classic Me Generation garbage. Baby boomers are the worst.

You guys voted for people who spent your ss money. So you can live on the street as far as I'm concerned.

 

[bbsam]

Great, I hope you enjoyed it. It was your choice where to spend your money, I'm fully behind that. The money did however go back into the economy and helped someone else. Your employees NO, someone else YES. Nothing wrong with that in my opinion. You have just demonstrated an example of micro economics.

Nope. You just demonstrated why trickle down or whatever you want to call it is a farce.

 

[Jkloc420]

You might be forgetting about Bush II, the Iraq war, his tax-cuts, etc.

Of course Obama added to the deficit, but he doesn't get all the blame.

bush sucked end of story and he had many mistakes. Many that you listed