Shooting at Oregon Community College

[Indecisi0n]

How come when a drunk driver kills people we don't ban alcohol or cars? Apparently the human takes zero responsibility.

 

[MrFedEx]

How come when a drunk driver kills people we don't ban alcohol or cars? Apparently the human takes zero responsibility.

Because it isn't intentional or premeditated. A gun is designed to kill things.

 

[Sportello]

Turns out the local OR sheriff, John Hanlin, is a Sandy Hook truther.

Shooter had 13 weapons, all legal, because in America, a crazy person can have as many weapons as he wants.

 

[sailfish]

Because it isn't intentional or premeditated. A gun is designed to kill things.

The people hit are no less dead.

 

[Babagounj]

Because it isn't intentional or premeditated. A gun is designed to kill things.

Not really .
A gun by it self is not able to kill things unless you use it as a physical striking object .
A gun does contain a barrel which is the tube, usually metal, through which a deflagration or rapid expansion of gases are released in order to propel a projectile out of the end at a high velocity. Only after some one places such projectile within the gun themselves and causes the above function to be preformed .

 

[The Other Side]

Of course, the responses on this latest shooting are identical to every other mass shooting in the country on this board.

The usual, "more guns would have saved lives" to "stickers dont save lives"... is the same kind of nonsense that keeps mass shootings on the rise in this country. The bigger issue, is HATE. This countrys right wing preaches HATE, and there are people to consume that HATE and act upon it.

Here we go again, another WHITE American man armed with more guns than he possibly needed for "self protection" in the home. Another wacked out ammosexual living his life in his basement assembling rounds and stacking guns while reading propaganda that drove his anger.

At the same time of this lunacy, his thoughts are consumed by terms like NANNY STATES, or GUN CONTROL. Gun owners dont want their guns taken away, and some feel the need to use those weapons against innocent persons to prove they have power. But do they really have power shooting unarmed people?

As I have said many times, it isnt about stickers or gun free zones... Its about COWARDS who feel compelled to live their lives consumed by guns and ammo.

The very people who must have a gun on them at all times. The very people who believe they cant go buy a gallon of milk without a pistol strapped to their sides. The very people who have lockers of guns in the home under some lunacy that 50 different kinds of guns in the home will keep them safe.

These nutballs live like this until that moment when they snap in the head and then want to go punish the most innocent of Americans knowing they will recieve virtually no resistance.

Nobody knows when a gun owner will go nuts, but reality tells us that its more often than it should be.

People died on that campus, yet you gun freaks will offer your "prayers and thoughts" which amount to a pile of doodoo compared to the lives shattered by the very tools of death you want to own so proudly, proudly that is, until you lose your mind and kill your own family, your neighbors, your coworkers or a fellow American.

People died in school, at the hands of a gun freak who grew up worshipping guns in state where thousands of other gun nuts live.

Of course, none of you gun freaks will get behind ANY new legislation that could possibly keep the most dangerous types of guns out of the hands of the wrong people.

Thats just bad for business.

Peoples lives dont matter to gun owners, gun sellers or the merchants of death who make those stupid things.


TOS.

 

[Sportello]

Because it isn't intentional or premeditated. A gun is designed to kill things.

Not really .
A gun by it self is not able to kill things unless you use it as a physical striking object .
A gun does contain a barrel which is the tube, usually metal, through which a deflagration or rapid expansion of gases are released in order to propel a projectile out of the end at a high velocity. Only after some one places such projectile within the gun themselves and causes the above function to be preformed .

Nonsense. You make no sense whatsoever.

Congratulations for keeping the streak alive.

 

[FrigidFTSup]

I can't figure out how people can justify reducing shootings by having more people carry guns. We need to regulate them better. Not tell people to get them to protect themselves. I shouldn't have to buy a gun to protect myself because other people own a guy. That's insanity.

The shooter is said to have singled out Christians.

I want to see how certain browncafe members talk themselves out of this one.

Give me a break. So one crazy guy means there's a war on Christians?

How come when a drunk driver kills people we don't ban alcohol or cars? Apparently the human takes zero responsibility.

Who says the responsibility isn't the humans? The fact is he used a gun to shoot 20 people. Show me someone who has gotten drunk and driven a car through a class room of 20 people or into an elementary school killing innocent people and then we can talk.

Not really .
A gun by it self is not able to kill things unless you use it as a physical striking object .
A gun does contain a barrel which is the tube, usually metal, through which a deflagration or rapid expansion of gases are released in order to propel a projectile out of the end at a high velocity. Only after some one places such projectile within the gun themselves and causes the above function to be preformed .

Semantics.

 

[ImWaitingForTheDay]

Of course, the responses on this latest shooting are identical to every other mass shooting in the country on this board.

The usual, "more guns would have saved lives" to "stickers dont save lives"... is the same kind of nonsense that keeps mass shootings on the rise in this country. The bigger issue, is HATE. This countrys right wing preaches HATE, and there are people to consume that HATE and act upon it.

Here we go again, another WHITE American man armed with more guns than he possibly needed for "self protection" in the home. Another wacked out ammosexual living his life in his basement assembling rounds and stacking guns while reading propaganda that drove his anger.

At the same time of this lunacy, his thoughts are consumed by terms like NANNY STATES, or GUN CONTROL. Gun owners dont want their guns taken away, and some feel the need to use those weapons against innocent persons to prove they have power. But do they really have power shooting unarmed people?

As I have said many times, it isnt about stickers or gun free zones... Its about COWARDS who feel compelled to live their lives consumed by guns and ammo.

The very people who must have a gun on them at all times. The very people who believe they cant go buy a gallon of milk without a pistol strapped to their sides. The very people who have lockers of guns in the home under some lunacy that 50 different kinds of guns in the home will keep them safe.

These nutballs live like this until that moment when they snap in the head and then want to go punish the most innocent of Americans knowing they will recieve virtually no resistance.

Nobody knows when a gun owner will go nuts, but reality tells us that its more often than it should be.

People died on that campus, yet you gun freaks will offer your "prayers and thoughts" which amount to a pile of doodoo compared to the lives shattered by the very tools of death you want to own so proudly, proudly that is, until you lose your mind and kill your own family, your neighbors, your coworkers or a fellow American.

People died in school, at the hands of a gun freak who grew up worshipping guns in state where thousands of other gun nuts live.

Of course, none of you gun freaks will get behind ANY new legislation that could possibly keep the most dangerous types of guns out of the hands of the wrong people.

Thats just bad for business.

Peoples lives dont matter to gun owners, gun sellers or the merchants of death who make those stupid things.


TOS.

Why don't the Republican presidential candidates allow guns at their campaign events? We thought they loved guns...

GOP Candidates to Make Every Campaign Event "Mandatory Gun Zone"

 

[ImWaitingForTheDay]

The people hit are no less dead.

Just another day at the NRA......

 

[MrFedEx]

The people hit are no less dead.

You can't understand the difference? Does gunpowder cause brain damage?

 

[MrFedEx]

Just another day at the NRA......

Big meeting today to see how gun sales can be increased with all the bad things happening with their beloved product line.

 

[MrFedEx]

Turns out the local OR sheriff, John Hanlin, is a Sandy Hook truther.

Shooter had 13 weapons, all legal, because in America, a crazy person can have as many weapons as he wants.

He needed 13 weapons to ensure his freedom from government tyranny. What's crazy about that?

 

[sailfish]

Just another day at the NRA......

Yeah?...........You attend their meetings or something?.................................................That has nothing to do with what I said........................................................................................

 

[sailfish]

You can't understand the difference? Does gunpowder cause brain damage?

Dead is dead. How does the difference matter? The fact the one was so easily preventable merely by a little personal responsibly in a way makes it even more of a tragic waste.

 

[sailfish]

Of course, the responses on this latest shooting are identical to every other mass shooting in the country on this board.

The usual, "more guns would have saved lives" to "stickers dont save lives"... is the same kind of nonsense that keeps mass shootings on the rise in this country. The bigger issue, is HATE. This countrys right wing preaches HATE, and there are people to consume that HATE and act upon it.

Here we go again, another WHITE American man armed with more guns than he possibly needed for "self protection" in the home. Another wacked out ammosexual living his life in his basement assembling rounds and stacking guns while reading propaganda that drove his anger.

At the same time of this lunacy, his thoughts are consumed by terms like NANNY STATES, or GUN CONTROL. Gun owners dont want their guns taken away, and some feel the need to use those weapons against innocent persons to prove they have power. But do they really have power shooting unarmed people?

As I have said many times, it isnt about stickers or gun free zones... Its about COWARDS who feel compelled to live their lives consumed by guns and ammo.

The very people who must have a gun on them at all times. The very people who believe they cant go buy a gallon of milk without a pistol strapped to their sides. The very people who have lockers of guns in the home under some lunacy that 50 different kinds of guns in the home will keep them safe.

These nutballs live like this until that moment when they snap in the head and then want to go punish the most innocent of Americans knowing they will recieve virtually no resistance.

Nobody knows when a gun owner will go nuts, but reality tells us that its more often than it should be.

People died on that campus, yet you gun freaks will offer your "prayers and thoughts" which amount to a pile of doodoo compared to the lives shattered by the very tools of death you want to own so proudly, proudly that is, until you lose your mind and kill your own family, your neighbors, your coworkers or a fellow American.

People died in school, at the hands of a gun freak who grew up worshipping guns in state where thousands of other gun nuts live.

Of course, none of you gun freaks will get behind ANY new legislation that could possibly keep the most dangerous types of guns out of the hands of the wrong people.

Thats just bad for business.

Peoples lives dont matter to gun owners, gun sellers or the merchants of death who make those stupid things.


TOS.

Yawn.

 

[ImWaitingForTheDay]

Dead is dead. How does the difference matter? The fact the one was so easily preventable merely by a little personal responsibly in a way makes it even more of a tragic waste.

Another swing... and a miss.

 

[Babagounj]

Of course, the responses on this latest shooting are identical to every other mass shooting in the country on this board.

The usual, "more guns would have saved lives" to "stickers dont save lives"... is the same kind of nonsense that keeps mass shootings on the rise in this country. The bigger issue, is HATE. This countrys right wing preaches HATE, and there are people to consume that HATE and act upon it.

Here we go again, another WHITE American man armed with more guns than he possibly needed for "self protection" in the home. Another wacked out ammosexual living his life in his basement assembling rounds and stacking guns while reading propaganda that drove his anger.

At the same time of this lunacy, his thoughts are consumed by terms like NANNY STATES, or GUN CONTROL. Gun owners dont want their guns taken away, and some feel the need to use those weapons against innocent persons to prove they have power. But do they really have power shooting unarmed people?

As I have said many times, it isnt about stickers or gun free zones... Its about COWARDS who feel compelled to live their lives consumed by guns and ammo.

The very people who must have a gun on them at all times. The very people who believe they cant go buy a gallon of milk without a pistol strapped to their sides. The very people who have lockers of guns in the home under some lunacy that 50 different kinds of guns in the home will keep them safe.

These nutballs live like this until that moment when they snap in the head and then want to go punish the most innocent of Americans knowing they will recieve virtually no resistance.

Nobody knows when a gun owner will go nuts, but reality tells us that its more often than it should be.

People died on that campus, yet you gun freaks will offer your "prayers and thoughts" which amount to a pile of doodoo compared to the lives shattered by the very tools of death you want to own so proudly, proudly that is, until you lose your mind and kill your own family, your neighbors, your coworkers or a fellow American.

People died in school, at the hands of a gun freak who grew up worshipping guns in state where thousands of other gun nuts live.

Of course, none of you gun freaks will get behind ANY new legislation that could possibly keep the most dangerous types of guns out of the hands of the wrong people.

Thats just bad for business.

Peoples lives dont matter to gun owners, gun sellers or the merchants of death who make those stupid things.


TOS.

Where have you been ?
I've missed you .

 

[sailfish]

Another swing... and a miss.

Ok.

 

[MrFedEx]

Not really .
A gun by it self is not able to kill things unless you use it as a physical striking object .
A gun does contain a barrel which is the tube, usually metal, through which a deflagration or rapid expansion of gases are released in order to propel a projectile out of the end at a high velocity. Only after some one places such projectile within the gun themselves and causes the above function to be preformed .

Yes, really. Referencing an earlier dumb analogy, cars are designed to carry people, not as something meant to kill. When a drunk kills someone driving a car, you people reason that the car is now a "weapon". It isn't. The car wasn't designed to kill.

A gun is specifically designed as a weapon. Your reasoning is severely flawed, as usual, because I could apply your rationale to a rock. It isn't able to kill things unless you use it as a striking object....your words. A rock could kill you if you were hit by a falling rock while driving down a mountain highway or while climbing said mountain.

I guess you get killed at the gun store if a display case full of them fell on you.