Storming the Capitol

[DriveInDriveOut]

Gee, I wonder why they went forward with it if it was too late? Can you tell me why?

The question you need to ask is why they waited. Can you figure out the obvious answer?

 

[bacha29]

You're so butthurt.
Give it up lady.

Typical response from you .... nothing substantive . The facts remain. Trump lost . Instead of being a standup guy like other presidents who failed to gain reelection like Carter and Bush 1 and accept the results leave and perform other tasks beneficial to the nation a desperate DJT tried everything he could think of in an attempt to stay in power.

Now why would he take such desperate measures? Perhaps we'll find out why in the days ahead.

 

[zubenelgenubi]

Says the man who thinks fraud and Constitutionality are determined by right-wing ideologues yelling into a microphone, instead of a courtroom.

You listen to idealogues, I listen to lawyers and read case law.

 

[zubenelgenubi]

By this logic the Senate could never pass the judgement to bar a former official from holding office again. They’d vote to convict and remove an impeached official and then their authority would end since that person would be a private citizen. It’s obviously not the founder’s intent and it’s not what is written in plain text. Keep grasping at a fringe interpretation to save your cult leader.

By your logic, they can impeach and convict any former office holder. There are principals within law including jurisdiction, statutes of limitations, etc. that can seem arbitrary and unfair at times. Impeachment is supposed to follow due process. The democrats hate the constitition and people's rights.

 

[bacha29]

"I dont believe" is not a convincing argument

Just as simply "not believing" Biden won the election is not a convincing argument.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

Now why would he take such desperate measures?

Because he believed he won.
This isn't complicated.

I'm sorry you're so butthurt but you need to accept the fact that he will be acquitted of your fake unconstitutional impeachment charges.

Deal with it.

 

[It will be fine]

By your logic, they can impeach and convict any former office holder. There are principals within law including jurisdiction, statutes of limitations, etc. that can seem arbitrary and unfair at times. Impeachment is supposed to follow due process. The democrats hate the constitition and people's rights.

Impeachment is not a judicial process. It is run however the Senate decides to run it. That’s how the framers laid it out. It’s a political process.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

Impeachment is not a judicial process. It is run however the Senate decides to run it. That’s how the framers laid it out. It’s a political process.

Yes if schumer wants to Impeach abraham lincoln for wearing too big a hat, that's his right. Smh, do you even believe the stuff you post?

 

[1989]

The question you need to ask is why they waited. Can you figure out the obvious answer?

Was it not answered prior to the constitutional vote? Notice vs ceremonial walk.

 

[zubenelgenubi]

Impeachment is not a judicial process. It is run however the Senate decides to run it. That’s how the framers laid it out. It’s a political process.

So I guess we can agree that this is a sham trial with no attempts being made to even pretend it has anything to do with fairness, reality, or the rule of law, just what our "law makers", the ones we elected to write fair and constitutional legislation, think is popular with their voting base. The differences between our views is you're ok with the situation. You don't honestly believe that's what the framers intended, do you?

 

[zubenelgenubi]

Was it not answered prior to the constitutional vote? Notice vs ceremonial walk.

The House didn't follow anything approaching due proccess either.

 

[bacha29]

Because he believed he won.
This isn't complicated.

I'm sorry you're so butthurt but you need to accept the fact that he will be acquitted of your fake unconstitutional impeachment charges.

Deal with it.

Just who is "he"?

 

[BadIdeaGuy]

Just who is "he"?

Seems pretty obvious if you look at the context.
You may have forgotten which hissy fit it was that you were throwing at the time though...
Just go back and reread your post.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

Just who is "he"?

 

[It will be fine]

So I guess we can agree that this is a sham trial with no attempts being made to even pretend it has anything to do with fairness, reality, or the rule of law, just what our "law makers", the ones we elected to write fair and constitutional legislation, think is popular with their voting base. The differences between our views is you're ok with the situation. You don't honestly believe that's what the framers intended, do you?

That’s exactly what the founders intended. If you don’t like how your representatives check the executive you have a remedy at the next election.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Peaceful protesters. LOL.

Colorado High Winter Painting

 

[bacha29]

View attachment 328113

Exactly. Simply because he and his supporters "believed" he won despite the fact that PROVEN election results speak to the contrary Trump and his supporters demanded that the American people accept nothing more their belief that he won to be sufficient to give him another term. Proven election result numbers turned out to be the "trump" card that trumped Trump.

 

[rod]

View attachment 328077

Look at the innocent face. Quit picking on Donald.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

That’s exactly what the founders intended. If you don’t like how your representatives check the executive you have a remedy at the next election.

I seriously doubt the Founding Fathers ever envisioned this missedtrial! LOL

 

[vantexan]

Now exactly what in your view is " right by the American public"? Now in keeping with what is "right" in your opinion regarding DJT should he or should he not be brought up on federal charges and if convicted should he or should he not serve time in a federal prison?

Federal charges for what? And the Senate trial is strictly about whether he should be removed from office.