Storming the Capitol

[Box Ox]

How many election recounts do you want?

The previous ones didn't check for bamboo fibers in the ballots, OK?!!

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

Hearings are not investigations.

There was a bipartisan investigation.
That investigation resulted in a 95 page report.

Again I'll ask you, how many investigations do you want?

Security, intelligence failures led to Jan. 6 insurrection: Bipartisan Senate report

A bipartisan Senate investigation of the deadly Jan. 6 insurrection found security and intelligence failures at every level of government that led to the Capitol's breach

abcnews.go.com

A bipartisan Senate investigation of the deadly Jan. 6 insurrection found security and intelligence failures at every level of government that led to the breach of the Capitol by a pro-Trump mob as lawmakers in a joint session were certifying the 2020 election.

The 95-page report, a product of a roughly five-month, joint probe by the Senate Homeland Security and Rules Committees, found significant breakdowns ranging "from federal intelligence agencies failing to warn of a potential for violence to a lack of planning and preparation by (U.S. Capitol Police) and law enforcement leadership." There was no overall operational or staffing plan for that fateful day, a total failure of leadership, according to the committees.

 

[The Driver]

There was a bipartisan investigation.
That investigation resulted in a 95 page report.

Again I'll ask you, how many investigations do you want?

Security, intelligence failures led to Jan. 6 insurrection: Bipartisan Senate report

A bipartisan Senate investigation of the deadly Jan. 6 insurrection found security and intelligence failures at every level of government that led to the Capitol's breach

abcnews.go.com

A bipartisan Senate investigation of the deadly Jan. 6 insurrection found security and intelligence failures at every level of government that led to the breach of the Capitol by a pro-Trump mob as lawmakers in a joint session were certifying the 2020 election.

The 95-page report, a product of a roughly five-month, joint probe by the Senate Homeland Security and Rules Committees, found significant breakdowns ranging "from federal intelligence agencies failing to warn of a potential for violence to a lack of planning and preparation by (U.S. Capitol Police) and law enforcement leadership." There was no overall operational or staffing plan for that fateful day, a total failure of leadership, according to the committees.

“The scope of the report is exceedingly narrow -- primarily focusing on what happened on the day of the attacks -- not the root cause of that violent day, a delicate topic for some Republicans who have sought to avoid addressing any role that former President Donald Trump may have played in inciting the attack.”

I want a full investigation. This Senate “investigation” isn’t the full deal.

Their report stated this was an attack on democracy. At least they got that right.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

I want a full investigation. This Senate “investigation” isn’t the full deal.

There was a full investigation and a 95 page report.

You want to cry about Trump, because he has owned your mind for five years and you're nothing without him.

Move on snowflake.

 

[fishtm2001]

Looks like it wasn't trump supporters that broke into the capital. Is there anything that you guys have been saying that is going to tread water.

check - 26 minute onward.

Fox News' lawyers said in court that no reasonable viewer would believe the statements Carlson makes.

 

[fishtm2001]

The previous ones didn't check for bamboo fibers in the ballots, OK?!!

Election Security Rumor vs. Reality | CISA

www.cisa.gov

 

[vantexan]

Fox News' lawyers said in court that no reasonable viewer would believe the statements Carlson makes.

And they said it because a precedent had been set with I believe Rachel Maddow at MSNBC. So they used the same strategy to thwart a frivolous lawsuit. Libs were perturbed because they thought they had a chance to hurt Carlson but now they're bringing up what was said without mentioning the legal precedent previously set by their very own. Luckily millions are watching Carlson show what's being said around the country by liberals pushing various things like CRT. He's not going away any time soon and no one is more effective at exposing the liberal agenda.

 

[vantexan]

Fox News' lawyers said in court that no reasonable viewer would believe the statements Carlson makes.

And speaking specifically to the above, another outfit turned up documents that showed undercover FBI agents were among the people who stormed the Capitol. Carlson just passed it along.

 

[fishtm2001]

And they said it because a precedent had been set with I believe Rachel Maddow at MSNBC. So they used the same strategy to thwart a frivolous lawsuit. Libs were perturbed because they thought they had a chance to hurt Carlson but now they're bringing up what was said without mentioning the legal precedent previously set by their very own. Luckily millions are watching Carlson show what's being said around the country by liberals pushing various things like CRT. He's not going away any time soon and no one is more effective at exposing the liberal agenda.

"The context of Maddow's statement shows reasonable viewers would consider the contested statement to be opinion."

US District Judge Cynthia Bashant

That's a lot different than;

"The "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.' "

"Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes."

Vyskocil, an appointee of President Trump's, added, "Whether the Court frames Mr. Carlson's statements as 'exaggeration,' 'non-literal commentary,' or simply bloviating for his audience, the conclusion remains the same — the statements are not actionable."

 

[fishtm2001]

And speaking specifically to the above, another outfit turned up documents that showed undercover FBI agents were among the people who stormed the Capitol. Carlson just passed it along.

Similar "false flag" claims have been made by far-right InfoWars host Alex Jones. And he was sued.

 

[vantexan]

"The context of Maddow's statement shows reasonable viewers would consider the contested statement to be opinion."

US District Judge Cynthia Bashant

That's a lot different than;

"The "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.' "

"Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes."

Vyskocil, an appointee of President Trump's, added, "Whether the Court frames Mr. Carlson's statements as 'exaggeration,' 'non-literal commentary,' or simply bloviating for his audience, the conclusion remains the same — the statements are not actionable."

Precedent set by Maddow, then used by Carlson's legal team. Nah nuh nah nah, nah nuh nah nah, hey hey hey, goodbye.

 

[vantexan]

Similar "false flag" claims have been made by far-right InfoWars host Alex Jones. And he was sued.

Except actual government documents have been turned up showing the FBI had undercover operatives participating. Why haven't they released thousands of hours of video footage from the 6th? You think that wasn't run by FOX legal before saying it?

 

[fishtm2001]

And speaking specifically to the above, another outfit turned up documents that showed undercover FBI agents were among the people who stormed the Capitol. Carlson just passed it along.

If FBI agents were in the crowd it would be to spy on them, not to goad them on. But that would be a convenient excuse for the Right since what happened is a huge embarrassment for donald and the gop.

 

[vantexan]

If FBI agents were in the crowd it would be to spy on them, not to goad them on. But that would be a convenient excuse for the Right since what happened is a huge embarrassment for donald and the gop.

Sure it's an embarrassment, and it will be a huge scandal if the government had agents involved in the planning stages who knew what was coming yet the government did nothing to stop it, knowing what it could do to Trump. They also found documents showing that two of the men involved in the planned kidnapping of Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer were FBI operatives.

 

[Ou812fu]

If FBI agents were in the crowd it would be to spy on them, not to goad them on. But that would be a convenient excuse for the Right since what happened is a huge embarrassment for donald and the gop.

You know everything you said about tucker, coukd be said about all news outlets. Hanging by a thread I see.

I love the looks I get pulling into a ups parking lot playing this song..

Gotta love the truth..

 

[PT Car Washer]

Sure it's an embarrassment, and it will be a huge scandal if the government had agents involved in the planning stages who knew what was coming yet the government did nothing to stop it, knowing what it could do to Trump. They also found documents showing that two of the men involved in the planned kidnapping of Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer were FBI operatives.

Sounds more like a Q Anon conspiracy theory.

 

[Ou812fu]

Sounds more like a Q Anon conspiracy theory.

What is q anon?

 

[Netsua 3:16]

You know subpoenas are for people that refuse to show up and testify right?

Give me a list of people who refused to testify that you believe can reveal new information.

Where we go one we go all

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

Where we go one we go all

Ya @The Driver seems to be suggesting some conspiracy theories. Tell us buddy, who are these people that need to be subpoenaed?

 

[Lineandinitial]

Ya @The Driver seems to be suggesting some conspiracy theories. Tell us buddy, who are these people that need to be subpoenaed?

We need a commission to decide who to talk to!!!

WILL SOMEONE PLEASE AGREE WITH ME?????