BrownArmy
Well-Known Member
Hannity was the only believer.
Wouldn’t be surprised if Hannity ended up in jail.
He’s literally ‘fake news’.
Hannity was the only believer.
I don't think 99% of the Republicans thought Trump would win either.
Only one I’m seeing crying a foul is the Dems.The hidden stuff is still hidden.
Why is the Trump Administration claiming Executive Privilege for Bush Administration documents?
Maybe ‘cause they want certain stuff to stay hidden?
If this situation were reversed, you’d be applauding the underdogs and demanding full transparency.
Get over it, the D’s found at least one of their balls and R’s are crying foul, fn hilarious
Only one I’m seeing crying a foul is the Dems.
Quit ya crying and lay down in the bed you made yourselves.
View attachment 211188
I wouldn't know.Hannity was the only believer.
This is the problem with the leftists of today.It’s a bed the Dems made, after the Repub’s washed the sheets for them.
The unprecedented refusal of R’s to even consider Obama’s judicial nominees, culminating in a stolen SC seat, is the story.
Trump brags that he’s confirmed more lower court judges in his first term than any other Prez, and that might be true, but he has only Mumbles to thank.
All those seats are stolen - the R’s wouldn’t even consider doing their Constitutional duty while Obama was Prez. Obama was literally dickless, and let it happen.
Can you imagine Trump letting someone roll him like that?
Me thinks not.
Anyway, the Dems changed the rules for Senate confirmation for lower court justices, but the Repubs changed the rules for SC judges.
All those judges should have asterisks next to their names.
As long as they do their job, you can put a bulldozer next their name.It’s a bed the Dems made, after the Repub’s washed the sheets for them.
All those judges should have asterisks next to their names.
As long as they do their job, you can put a bulldozer next their name.
Yep ... you forget, I don't really care.So you’d be completely OK if the situation were reversed, and a Dem Legislative branch had completely blocked legitimate judicial nominees, and then packed the courts with D picks?
As long as they do their job, right?
Of course, there is one judge and 25 or so politicians.This is what I mean about SC nominee hearings, everyone pretends it’s not political, but it’s the definition of political...
Yep ... you forget, I don't really care.
The areas where the SCOTUS creates new laws is in the Social arena and I am a Social Liberal.
Of course, there is one judge and 25 or so politicians.
Once the judge gets in office, hopefully they don't try to legislate from the bench.
I wouldn't know.
I strongly dislike that guy.
It's like Trump took lessons from him.
Only cable pundit I dislike more is Rachel Madcow.
Hannity is on right now.I don't like him.. I hate MadCow
To Hannity's credit..they haven't flushed him out like O'reilly and some others.
So you’d be completely OK if the situation were reversed, and a Dem Legislative branch had completely blocked legitimate judicial nominees, and then packed the courts with D picks?
As long as they do their job, right?
Obama - elections have consequences.
Snowflake much?
They’ll cry, hopefully the Dems have some stones and hold the same standard. No judicial appointments unless a party holds the White House and the Senate.Yah, I was talking about Obama’s last term...elections have consequences, and Mumbles straight up ignored them. And got away with it.
You don’t mind because Trump gets to fill all those ‘empty’ seats, and you like who he’s putting in, but it’s BS.
Like I said, if the situation were reversed, you’d cry like a red-headed step-child getting slapped by a scary clown.
It’s a bed the Dems made, after the Repub’s washed the sheets for them.
The unprecedented refusal of R’s to even consider Obama’s judicial nominees, culminating in a stolen SC seat, is the story.
Trump brags that he’s confirmed more lower court judges in his first term than any other Prez, and that might be true, but he has only Mumbles to thank.
All those seats are stolen - the R’s wouldn’t even consider doing their Constitutional duty while Obama was Prez. Obama was literally dickless, and let it happen.
Can you imagine Trump letting someone roll him like that?
Me thinks not.
Anyway, the Dems changed the rules for Senate confirmation for lower court justices, but the Repubs changed the rules for SC judges.
All those judges should have asterisks next to their names.
Yah, I was talking about Obama’s last term...elections have consequences, and Mumbles straight up ignored them. And got away with it.
You don’t mind because Trump gets to fill all those ‘empty’ seats, and you like who he’s putting in, but it’s BS.
Like I said, if the situation were reversed, you’d cry like a red-headed step-child getting slapped by a scary clown.