The mods felt that the weak must have some protection. So I apparently cannot state my opinion freely.
You must have misread what I wrote. You can certainly state your opinion, just do it without insulting anyone.
The mods felt that the weak must have some protection. So I apparently cannot state my opinion freely.
Ok. Fair enough.The mods felt that the weak must have some protection. So I apparently cannot state my opinion freely.
You must have misread what I wrote. You can certainly state your opinion, just do it without insulting anyone.
A black man/hero. I am ok ith this.
'You think I and 407 blindly follow TDU?
I thought you were stupid and I'm sorry. Now I have confirmed you are stupid, so thank you!
What is you position at UPS?YOU on the other hand, simply have diarhea of the mouth.
What is you position at UPS?
I am a little here, but......TOS, there is no "vagueness" when it comes to the word "defraud"; it is not a synonym for "dishonest". That is important. and not weak language.
You must have misread what I wrote. You can certainly state your opinion, just do it without insulting anyone.
Careful. I was begged to go easy on you for 2 weeks.
Several of our friends have told us that Ron H talked mass garbage on Local 89 for having the courage to stand up for their members.
Ron H knows already that he will not survive his next election and will easily be defeated!
No more than I would take child rearing advice from your mother. I might ask her about food stamps and welfare and what the nicest trailer park in town is.Oh ok. Would you take investment advice from a homeless man?
Ok, but semantics is enough to allow a overly aggressive manager or supervisor to "stretch" an interpretation of the word "defraud". Why not just use the word "dishonesty".?
And the reason is, "dishonesty" isnt as open and shut as the word "defraud".
For example. I could be on my lunch, take an extra 10 minutes to clean my mirrors, or wipe my windshield, or adjust my load, and a manager "could" (hypothetically speaking) suggest that I was stealing time. If the word was "dishonesty", then the company would not have much of a chance to terminate me for "stealing time" whereas, if the word was "Defrauding", the company may be able to suggest that I intentionally delayed myself cleaning objects that didnt need cleaning and therefore, creating a delay, stealing time and thereby "defrauding" the company out of time.
As to the first point, the company wouldnt be able to prove that i was dishonest as there is Nothing dishonest about cleaning mirrors or windows or adjusting loads.
As to the second point, the company "COULD" prove that I was "defrauding" the company out of time, by electing ( an intentional act ) to clean objects that didnt need cleaning and causing an unnecesary delay that "extended" my day and took me into overtime that would have otherwise not been paid.
It depends on the strength of the labor manager pushing the case. Some of them are well trained, and can twist the contract into pretzels. On the other hand, some union reps who handle the same language can twist it back into a straight line.
TOS
And you are?No more than I would take child rearing advice from your mother. I might ask her about food stamps and welfare and what the nicest trailer park in town is.Oh ok. Would you take investment advice from a homeless man?