The 2024 Presidential Race Thread

newfie

Well-Known Member
I kinda like the idea..... open up ALL ethics reports no matter what party affiliation
seems relevant to an AG background check. i have mixed feelings on it. But again in this case we're trying to hold trump and his people to a different standard then other administrations.

seeems like DOJ clearing him should be enough. I'm sure this weaponized justice system would have loved to have something to charge him with.
 
Last edited:

tourists24

Well-Known Member
seems relevant to an AG background check. i have mixed feelings on it. But again in this case we're trying to hold trump and his people to a different standard then other administrations.

seeems like DOJ clearing him should be enough. I'm sure this weaponized justice system would have loved to have something to charge him with.
It’s one of the reasons I voted for Trump. He’s an outsider to those in congress and all of its agencies. There’s a reason leadership in both parties fight him.
 

Box Ox

Well-Known Member
Biden is a real man. He respects the outcome of his son’s legal case and hasn’t pardoned his son. Clowns like Trump and Greg Abbot fell all over themselves to pardon criminals and pedophiles.
Clearly, you know he’s not a real man that’s why you have disappeared.

I appreciate that a leftist can talk about “a real man” and then instantly go back to not knowing what a man or a woman is. Come baaaaaack, @Next Day Err . It’s too entertaining!
 

Babagounj

Strength through joy
And another court sides with Trump.

We reject the County’s assertion...
There is no basis...
The Executive Order violates the intergovernmental immunity doctrine ...
The Executive Order violates this precept.
This discrimination, plain on the face of the Order, contravenes the intergovernmental immunity doctrine...
The County’s attempt to evade the intergovernmental immunity doctrine through a market-participant defense likewise fails.
To begin with, there is a lack of evidence of such disruptions...
The anti-commandeering doctrine provides no defense to the Executive Order
invalidating the Order does not lead to a violation of the Tenth Amendment’s anti-commandeering principle.
Instead, the United States is asking King County, in its capacity as the owner of a public airport facility, to lift a discriminatory prohibition on private parties’ ability to engage in business with the federal government that supports federal immigration efforts.
King County’s Executive Order also fails under the intergovernmental immunity doctrine. This doctrine is an outgrowth of the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause.
King County’s Executive Order on its face discriminates against the United States “by singling out” the federal government and its contractors “for unfavorable treatment” or “regulat[ing] them unfavorably on some basis related to their governmental ‘status.’
 
Top