The Canada Report.

[zubenelgenubi]

Hedges v. Obama - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

yes it is

What does that have to do with occupy wall street? Does Hedges only care about non-citizens being indefinitely detained without due process? Or is he suing over the unlawful detainment of January 6th protesters?

K. Thanks.

 

[rickyb]

What does that have to do with occupy wall street? Does Hedges only care about non-citizens being indefinitely detained without due process? Or is he suing over the unlawful detainment of January 6th protesters?

K. Thanks.

that was how the govt reacted to occupy wall street which started a few months before and was shut down by a coordinated violent effort by the federal govt

its for anyone

you might ask why you dont know about this

 

[rickyb]

Just pointing it out for ya, comrade.

y u little twerp

 

[zubenelgenubi]

that was how the govt reacted to occupy wall street which started a few months before and was shut down by a coordinated violent effort by the federal govt

its for anyone

you might ask why you dont know about this

The link you posted said the detainment was for Al Qaida supporters. I suppose that could include a small handful of American Citizens who joined or supported Al Qaida or the Taliban. This Wikipedia entry also claims that it gives the military the right to detain journalists based on vague accusations.

My question is, how many journalists or American Citizens were detained under the defense budget legislation that is only good for a year? Are you saying that occupy wall street people were linked to Al Qaida or the Taliban and indefinitely detained?

I'm not saying, nor would I ever suggest, that the government doesn't do shady stuff. Just give me some examples of what you are talking about here so I can determine if it's legit. And if you say Assange, I'm going to have to remind you he is being held in the UK and charges that were manufactured with the assistance of a US intelligence asset, awaiting potential extradition to the US. So, you'd have to explain to me how that fits in with the NDAA story.

 

[rickyb]

The link you posted said the detainment was for Al Qaida supporters. I suppose that could include a small handful of American Citizens who joined or supported Al Qaida or the Taliban. This Wikipedia entry also claims that it gives the military the right to detain journalists based on vague accusations.

My question is, how many journalists or American Citizens were detained under the defense budget legislation that is only good for a year? Are you saying that occupy wall street people were linked to Al Qaida or the Taliban and indefinitely detained?

I'm not saying, nor would I ever suggest, that the government doesn't do shady stuff. Just give me some examples of what you are talking about here so I can determine if it's legit. And if you say Assange, I'm going to have to remind you he is being held in the UK and charges that were manufactured with the assistance of a US intelligence asset, awaiting potential extradition to the US. So, you'd have to explain to me how that fits in with the NDAA story.

its unrelated to wikileaks as far as i know. that was just pure lawlessness

NDAA would apply to anyone american or not as far as i recall

..."that the NDAA arms the U.S. military with the ability to imprison indefinitely journalists, activists and human-rights workers based on vague allegations.[8]"

Hedges v. Obama - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Operational needs]

its unrelated to wikileaks as far as i know. that was just pure lawlessness

NDAA would apply to anyone american or not as far as i recall

..."that the NDAA arms the U.S. military with the ability to imprison indefinitely journalists, activists and human-rights workers based on vague allegations.[8]"

Hedges v. Obama - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

You’ve been awfully defensive of your country for the last few weeks. Not liking Canada being in the negative spotlight are you?

 

[rickyb]

You’ve been awfully defensive of your country for the last few weeks. Not liking Canada being in the negative spotlight are you?

have i?

quote me princess

 

[UnionStrong]

It's probably sometimes hard for you to realize due to the schizophrenia that you're actually the biggest sexual deviant here on BC by far. It's not even close.

Does that mean you’re not a sex criminal? I’m confused….Lol

 

[UnionStrong]

What does that have to do with occupy wall street? Does Hedges only care about non-citizens being indefinitely detained without due process? Or is he suing over the unlawful detainment of January 6th protesters?

K. Thanks.

Brainwashing for dummies

 

[rickyb]

Brainwashing for dummies

jihad for dummies?

 

[UnionStrong]

jihad for dummies?

There’s one for everything

 

[rickyb]

There’s one for everything

i dont teach that one

 

[Box Ox]

Does that mean you’re not a sex criminal? I’m confused….Lol

I am not. Didn't think that was a question worth answering since it came from the mind of a schizophrenic cross-dressing Canadian anarcho-communist who's been factually owned by me more times than I care to count.

 

[UnionStrong]

I am not. Didn't think that was a question worth answering since it came from the mind of a schizophrenic cross-dressing Canadian anarcho-communist who's been factually owned by me more times than I care to count.

Nicely said!

 

[zubenelgenubi]

its unrelated to wikileaks as far as i know. that was just pure lawlessness

NDAA would apply to anyone american or not as far as i recall

..."that the NDAA arms the U.S. military with the ability to imprison indefinitely journalists, activists and human-rights workers based on vague allegations.[8]"

Hedges v. Obama - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Right, I read that claim. But did anyone get imprisoned under those terms? That legislation is only good for a year, as it establishes defense budgeting. I'm not saying they don't slide other stuff into unrelated legislation, because they do, but there had to have been better bills to tack something like that onto.

 

[zubenelgenubi]

I am not. Didn't think that was a question worth answering since it came from the mind of a schizophrenic cross-dressing Canadian anarcho-communist who's been factually owned by me more times than I care to count.

Just because you haven't been convicted doesn't mean you're not a sex criminal.

 

[rickyb]

Right, I read that claim. But did anyone get imprisoned under those terms? That legislation is only good for a year, as it establishes defense budgeting. I'm not saying they don't slide other stuff into unrelated legislation, because they do, but there had to have been better bills to tack something like that onto.

This Administration Has The Power To Indefinitely Detain Americans Without Charge Or Trial

This Administration Has The Power To Indefinitely Detain Americans Without Charge Or Trial

www.huffpost.com

this was written in 2017 so i assume its still on the books

 

[Box Ox]

Just because you haven't been convicted doesn't mean you're not a sex criminal.

But enough about your own run-ins with the criminal justice system.

 

[zubenelgenubi]

This Administration Has The Power To Indefinitely Detain Americans Without Charge Or Trial

This Administration Has The Power To Indefinitely Detain Americans Without Charge Or Trial

www.huffpost.com

this was written in 2017 so i assume its still on the books

So, no one until the January 6th protesters? Got it. They were so scared Trump would use it, when it was Obama who signed it into law, and Biden who's been using it? BTW, these people need to stop reporting on this stuff like these laws are legitimate. Unconstitutional laws are void.

 

[zubenelgenubi]

But enough about your own run-ins with the criminal justice system.

Touché. I think that's what you tried to convince the police you actually said to that under aged girl.