The Derek Chauvin Trial

[vantexan]

Wrong
People who say racist things get labeled racist

Actually anyone who demonstrates a conservative mindset is labeled racist unless he proves otherwise.

 

[Netsua 3:16]

Actually anyone who demonstrates a conservative mindset is labeled racist unless he proves otherwise.

Ok.
Good talk

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

Wrong
People who say racist things get labeled racist

“How much money do I owe you. Becaause n***a you better not be charging me Hennessy rates.”

-Joe Biden's son Hunter

 

[Box Ox]

Wrong
People who say racist things get labeled racist

Don't you have some black feet to kiss, you dirty white?

 

[bbsam]

I consider your post as DISINGENUOUS!

If that was all it was these days, I would support CRT for law school students.

We all know that CRT has been appropriated by various groups to extend these ideas to the general population.

So CRT has been “appropriated by various groups to extend these ideas to the general population” is a bad thing? Educating people on how their lives may be affected or even grossly altered by the possibly racist manner in which some individuals apply the law should not be public knowledge? Why not? Seems like something that should be front and center if folks are concerned about justice.

 

[BrownFlush]

Wrong
People who say racist things get labeled racist

Define racist.

 

[zubenelgenubi]

So CRT has been “appropriated by various groups to extend these ideas to the general population” is a bad thing? Educating people on how their lives may be affected or even grossly altered by the possibly racist manner in which some individuals apply the law should not be public knowledge? Why not? Seems like something that should be front and center if folks are concerned about justice.

Claiming that this is what CRT is in practice betrays an extreme naivete. Unless you are pretending. CRT attempts to collectivize guilt, which is evil.

 

[Poop Head]

Define racist.

Homosapien

 

[bbsam]

Claiming that this is what CRT is in practice betrays an extreme naivete. Unless you are pretending. CRT attempts to collectivize guilt, which is evil.

Guilt? Ok. So you’d rather ignore it and let individuals apply and write laws in a racist manner?

 

[El Correcto]

Guilt? Ok. So you’d rather ignore it and let individuals apply and write laws in a racist manner?

Name some of these laws.

 

[Poop Head]

Name some of these laws.

Laws against murder, burglary, assault, drug dealing, petty theft. You know, the racist laws..

 

[Old Man Jingles]

So CRT has been “appropriated by various groups to extend these ideas to the general population” is a bad thing?
Educating people on how their lives may be affected or even grossly altered by the possibly racist manner in which some individuals apply the law should not be public knowledge? Why not?
Seems like something that should be front and center if folks are concerned about justice.

Claiming that this is what CRT is in practice betrays an extreme naivete. Unless you are pretending. CRT attempts to collectivize guilt, which is evil.

Or as I originally posted, @bbsam's original post was disingenuous.

And once again, his response is disingenuous.

So CRT has been “appropriated by various groups to extend these ideas to the general population” is a bad thing?

Yes it is because the purpose of the extension is to malign people that do not agree with other's opinions about relations.

Educating people on how their lives may be affected or even grossly altered by the possibly racist manner in which some individuals apply the law should not be public knowledge? Why not?

It should be knowledge that is available but not indoctrination in non-legal related manners.
CRT should be taught a Law Schools for the use by lawyers.
The concepts are not for consumption by non-lawyers since the misapplication of these legal concepts by pundits, social workers, the general population has created a morass of idiotic ideas and concepts.

Seems like something that should be front and center if folks are concerned about justice.

CRT is about what happens to an individual in the USA governments' legal system.

CRT has nothing to do with relationships between individuals in the USA general population and
we have experienced the dissonance and utter stupidity of controlling people
when applied to the relationships between individuals in the USA general population.

 

[Netsua 3:16]

“How much money do I owe you. Becaause n***a you better not be charging me Hennessy rates.”

-Joe Biden's son Hunter

Nice
What does Hunter Biden have anything to do with our conversation again?
We were talking about how you act super racist all the time, Kanye

 

[bbsam]

Or as I originally posted, @bbsam's original post was disingenuous.

And once again, his response is disingenuous.


Yes it is because the purpose of the extension is to malign people that do not agree with other's opinions about relations.


It should be knowledge that is available but not indoctrination in non-legal related manners.
CRT should be taught a Law Schools for the use by lawyers.
The concepts are not for consumption by non-lawyers since the misapplication of these legal concepts by pundits, social workers, the general population has created a morass of idiotic ideas and concepts.


CRT is about what happens to an individual in the USA governments' legal system.

CRT has nothing to do with relationships between individuals in the USA general population and
we have experienced the dissonance and utter stupidity of controlling people
when applied to the relationships between individuals in the USA general population.

 

[floridays]

So CRT has been “appropriated by various groups to extend these ideas to the general population” is a bad thing? Educating people on how their lives may be affected or even grossly altered by the possibly racist manner in which some individuals apply the law should not be public knowledge? Why not? Seems like something that should be front and center if folks are concerned about justice.

I don't know, lets run this past Reade Seligmann, Collin Finnerty and Dave Evans.

 

[bbsam]

I don't know, lets run this past Reade Seligmann, Collin Finnerty and Dave Evans.

Ttku. @Old Man Jingles already agreed.

 

[floridays]

Ttku. @Old Man Jingles already agreed.

I'm not @Old Man Jingles, I was speaking for myself.
Who were the three males?
What is their significance?

 

[bbsam]

I'm not @Old Man Jingles, I was speaking for myself.
Who were the three males?
What is their significance?

Don’t know. Don’t care.

 

[floridays]

Don’t know. Don’t care.

They are the Duke Boys.
You should care.
Duke Lacrosse.

 

[bbsam]

They are the Duke Boys.
You should care.
Duke Lacrosse.

Still don’t.