The Derek Chauvin Trial
- Thread starter El Correcto
- Start date
oldngray
nowhere special
Chauvin was probably negligent but no way did the prosecution prove it was intentional. I think they were surprised by the guilty of all charges verdict since they were already going to push for aggravated sentencing to get a stiffer sentence on lesser charges.
MAKAVELI
Well-Known Member
If that's the case, then every trial is a witch trial. That's how charges are brought against a defendant. Ttku....
sailfish
Master of Karate and Friendship for Everyone
Contradicterally? And guilty of all of them?
fishtm2001
Well-Known Member
Legal expert blows up right-wing claims about Derek Chauvin jurors
Conservative apologists for police violence have argued that jurors were too afraid to acquit Derek Chauvin in the murder of George Floyd, but one legal analyst flatly rejected those claims.MSNBC contributor Joyce Vance, a former U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Alabama, tossed aside...
www.rawstory.com
Just read on Google News that per state law he will only be sentenced on the most serious charge. He could potentially get the maximum 40 years but under sentencing guidelines because he has no record it will most likely be the minimum 12 years. Prosecutors however are requesting additional time added to that. And because of various circumstances surrounding the case he has a good chance of getting it overturned on appeal.
MAKAVELI
Well-Known Member
They aren't contradictory. That's why he is guilty on all 3 counts.
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
Lmao that's the best you could do?Legal expert blows up right-wing claims about Derek Chauvin jurors
Conservative apologists for police violence have argued that jurors were too afraid to acquit Derek Chauvin in the murder of George Floyd, but one legal analyst flatly rejected those claims.MSNBC contributor Joyce Vance, a former U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Alabama, tossed aside...
Pathetic.
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
newfie
Well-Known Member
If I'm a jury and I vote any other way but guilty i'm in fear of being doxed and having the crazies come after me.
oldngray
nowhere special
The judge said he was going to release the jurors names so no need to dox them
newfie
Well-Known Member
wow
sailfish
Master of Karate and Friendship for Everyone
Manslaughter, unintentional murder, and murder don't contradict eachother? Him being found guilty of all three by a coerced jury doesn't change that, even in this backwards, upside down clown world.
oldngray
nowhere special
It's almost as if the judge wants a mistrial
newfie
Well-Known Member
what juror would deliver anything but a guilty verdict knowing the judge will release their names
MAKAVELI
Well-Known Member
Nobody was coerced. This was a diverse jury who found him guilty on all 3 counts based on the evidence given. People, especially people of color, have been convicted on much less evidence. But you cuckservatives don't cry when that happens. Instructions were given to the jury by the judge on each count. This is normal procedure in our justice system. If he is guilty on the highest count, he is guilty of the lower counts. It's really not that complicated.
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
The jury selection process gave everyone an easy out to stay off the jury.
These people either had an agenda or are mentally retarded. No one else would stick around for that.
What'dyabringmetoday???
Banned
You obviously are not manipulated by punctuation or grammar.
I have the urge to graffiti over that like gang bangers do...