MrFedEx
Engorged Member
Potentially illegal?!?!?!? I think almost all of us can agree its illegal. Politicians apparently are the ones who think its legal.
And who owns the politicians? Mr. Smith does.
Potentially illegal?!?!?!? I think almost all of us can agree its illegal. Politicians apparently are the ones who think its legal.
not at all. It was posted earlier that UPS and the Teamsters have been down this road before. How much of THEIR money would YOU like them to spend on YOUR goals?
The Market ? When was the last divedend posted by Fred-Ex ? Ups has steadily declared rising divedends every quater .
I don't think UPS cares about market-share erosion. They know they have a competitiveness problem. Their focus now
is "profitability". We're force-fed accident and injury prevention...........not a mention in months about growing the business. Heck, I don't even know what my Business Development Rep looks like. So keep taking our market share........the robots we work for don't care.
Its like delivering the AIR on time everyday..do I have to remind you?
Let me know how I can help.
not at all. It was posted earlier that UPS and the Teamsters have been down this road before. How much of THEIR money would YOU like them to spend on YOUR goals?
Let me explain how this works. First, with zero benefits, the health care costs of a Ground driver fall to the taxpayer, who will pay the Emergency Room bill when the Ground employee or his family get sick. Second, Ground pay is low enough where drivers actually qualify for public assistance. Guess who pays for that? You do. Fred S has successfully passed these costs onto the taxpayer, just like WalMart does.
Very good point! And an eye opener.
Government-subsidized workers employed by a private corporation. I'm no Libertarian, but that's just wrong, and gives Mr. Smith an incredibly unfair competitive advantage.
All good points that mean nothing. The government WANTS the law governing contract work to remain vague. What does that tell you? It tells me that they are finding huge cost benefits to it as well. Congress and the courts might just as well tell UPS that if they want to change their own business model, well that is UPS's business.
I don't care how the law reads an independent contractor should have control of all aspects of their day and job in general. Please tell me what choices a FedEx ground contractor has?
No $. UPS dropped their NASCAR sponsership. FedEx continues to sponsership the number 11 Denny Hamlin car.
Fedex continues to sponser an entire PGA golf playoff. FedEx sponsers FedEx Field. On and on...........
UPS mantra is cut, cut, cut........
"I don't care how the law reads....". Have another drink.
Believe I'd had two at that point. Simply stating that your average person doesn't care how the law reads. I'm telling u how MOST people feel the law should be applied.