Phillip J Fry
sobbing between stops
Man, I'm like 0-loserville on these vote predictions. Started with the 2016 US presidential election lost a bet over a can of chew on that one.
What?Master is a done deal. Doesn't matter what you "would" voe.
Central was a NO.
That is exactly what he said!
Not on the Master, it passed. Second vote only on those Supplements that did not pass.
Due to the bylaws of the IBT. The master is ratified meaning it passed! There was not a high enough percentage of no votes.I'm confused are you saying only supplements went down and the national agreement past. So this is like the last time.
Not trueDue to the bylaws of the IBT. The master is ratified meaning it passed! There was not a high enough percentage of no votes.
The master has passed as far as I’m concerned.
MASTER REJECTED. TAYLOR SAID HE WILL GO BACK TO RENEGOTIATE.
that's if they use that by law to pass the national, you really think they willDue to the bylaws of the IBT. The master is ratified meaning it passed! There was not a high enough percentage of no votes.
Charge your phone broWow look at the UPSers.com web sight. The contract has past graphic must of had to be changed lol
View attachment 215810
The master has passed as far as I’m concerned.
Due to the bylaws of the IBT. The master is ratified meaning it passed! There was not a high enough percentage of no votes.
Lmfao.Due to the bylaws of the IBT. The master is ratified meaning it passed! There was not a high enough percentage of no votes.
No the master did not pass. They are taking a very creative interpretation of the languageMaster is a done deal. Doesn't matter what you "would" voe.
Central was a NO.
That is exactly what he said!
Not on the Master, it passed. Second vote only on those Supplements that did not pass.
Technically the company could offer a worse deal. I don’t think they will though. I think they implement the NMA and the supplements that got voted down will be in the same situation as last contract. IMOOmg I agree with you in something!! That it’s good bye cruel world it was a fun trip.
He put the ball in UPS court."According to the constitution we have a ratified contract"
I think those were the words.
I personally don't believe he "has to" impose the contract.
Was this the "final offer"? Has he stated so?
If it was the "final offer" why would he be asking UPS to come back to the table?