The ( OFFICIAL ) angry Contract results thread!

[The Range]

The union does not engage new hires and it trickles down. How many 18-year-old kids in a first job give care enough to vote? It's by design, wake up. You've been played by people with a 4-year degree in sociology from an SJW college.

 

[Tony Q]

None of us do.

We aren’t going to let you ruin the golden goose for another 5 years. That’s a win. Sean is screwed in 2023. He will me remedied by a lot of members as the vote no Tdu guy. In 2023 he will be the vote yes guy. To confusing for most members.

 

[The Range]

@Tony Q You're going to jail deplorable.

 

[silverbullet2893]

You have a very large and impressive vocabulary.

See you still haven’t suck started that .45 yet. Disappointing.

 

[PT Car Washer]

The union does not engage new hires and it trickles down. How many 18-year-old kids in a first job give care enough to vote? It's by design, wake up. You've been played by people with a 4-year degree in sociology from an SJW college.

And how many FT voted yes because it was in their own personal best interest. Most, believe me.

 

[The Range]

And how many FT voted yes because it was in their own personal best interest. Most, believe me.

Irrelevant. The contract was voted down by a majority vote. That's how a democracy works. No arbitrary hoops involved to override the process. There is no electoral college. This is mob rule, period. The mob said NO.

 

[Tony Q]

See you still haven’t suck started that .45 yet. Disappointing.

This will be my last comment to you. You have no skin in the game and nothing to offer.

 

[Just A UPS Guy]

Maybe I should contact my brother in law about those heavy machinery op openings.

I have no reason to go anywhere, I'm gonna be fine, but I reeaaallllyy feel for those following behind.

 

[PT Car Washer]

Irrelevant. The contract was voted down by a majority vote. That's how a democracy works. No arbitrary hoops involved to override the process. There is no electoral college. This is mob rule, period. The mob said NO.

The mob didn't even show up. And while yes a majority did vote no, 46% voted yes. I voted no while I am pretty sure all of my FT co workers voted yes.

 

[The Range]

The mob didn't even show up. And while yes a majority did vote no, 46% voted yes. I voted no while I am pretty sure all of my FT co workers voted yes.

No means no. 100% of the voters could have voted NO, the same outcome.

 

[Just A UPS Guy]

We aren’t going to let you ruin the golden goose for another 5 years. That’s a win. Sean is screwed in 2023. He will me remedied by a lot of members as the vote no Tdu guy. In 2023 he will be the vote yes guy. To confusing for most members.

You really think widening a gap between the union and it's members is a win? That's what I'm referring to, it's pitiful.

Your "win" is extremely short-term. Five years? Great goal, glad you're playing the long game.

 

[Tony Q]

You really think widening a gap between the union and it's members is a win? That's what I'm referring to, it's pitiful.

Your "win" is extremely short-term. Five years? Great goal, glad you're playing the long game.

The members want to ruin this golden goose.

 

[silverbullet2893]

This will be my last comment to you. You have no skin in the game and nothing to offer.

Back at ya. in bitch.

 

[Tony Q]

Apathy entitlement laziness

 

[Maple Grove MN Driver]

People apparently don't care a out their livelihood.
Just proves how weak the Union is.

 

[Maple Grove MN Driver]

Irrelevant. The contract was voted down by a majority vote. That's how a democracy works. No arbitrary hoops involved to override the process. There is no electoral college. This is mob rule, period. The mob said NO.

Actually less than 50% voted
So the majority of people didn't vote.

 

[The Range]

Actually less than 50% voted
So the majority of people didn't vote.

I said if those who voted had all been NO votes, it would have been the same outcome as the previous poster is arguing that 46% voted YES, as if that matters. If it was 100% NO, 0% YES, the contract would be imposed regardless.

 

[Maple Grove MN Driver]

I said if those who voted had all been NO votes, it would have been the same outcome as the previous poster is arguing that 46% voted YES, as if that matters.

Huh
Try to at least make sense.

 

[Just A UPS Guy]

The members want to ruin this golden goose.

You may be right, but it would've taken minimal tweaks with minimal financial impact to get enough votes to ratify this outright. If this was supported by a 50%+1 vote, there would be no argument. All they had to do was appeal to a few more, and that would've been easy enough through several different avenues. The hard truth of it is that a contract doesn't have to take care of everyone it covers, it only has to appease half of the people that care about it.

 

[Alamo Joe]

This result could be the straw to break the camels back. Low turnout suggest a non united front. Folks dont seem to care. 100 bucks a month back in someones pocket might just happen.