Turdferguson
Just a turd
Stay away from my gifs you son of a b*!!!!Lmfao!!!!
Stay away from my gifs you son of a b*!!!!Lmfao!!!!
Will these hybrids draw the same pension as a current full time driver? Will they make driver pay when they work inside or just when they drive?
I always wondered how to crawl out of the woodwork.
Vote nooooooooooIt’s all BS. They are cutting routes like mad men, but if we vote this in they will add more? It doesn’t make any sense at all.
I think it’s two high of a number... ups already said they aren’t even sure if they are going to continue sat driving ... so now these hybrids are going to drive 5 days a week....ups wanted the sat help.. think they need to keep their driving work centered toward those two days unless there’s an emergency or something on a weekday...I totally see ups exploiting this language guys...We will see how strict that 25% limit is. I do like that part. It limits the use of 224 drivers in place of rpcd.
Can anybody still here tell me why we need lesser paid 22.4 drivers? @Tony Q stomped off and is giving me the silent treatment over my decertification question. Are UPS profits in danger if full rate drivers are not curtailed?!
542... even if this passes in some form there will still be areas that won’t be able to get people from inside our ranks to do these jobs... they will have to hire from the outside...there are just too many variables about these jobs... but I definitely don’t like that there probably isn’t any language to state that they can’t use them for 5 days of straight driving.... that’s not ok.. if we agree to this hybrid it’s so their main job is inside to help with the high pt turnover and if available then maybe get a day or maybe 2 of driving... if there’s no language in there pertaining to that then I’m voting NO....Only thing I like out of all that crap is no more outside hires.
Still SOOOOOOO many loop holes in that weak language.
And a few years later you made the same rate as the rest of the drivers.
These guys and gals will be $6 behind us.
That’s it in a nutshell brother ......Greed. By both the union and company
Union gets more pension money and the company gets cheaper labor
542... even if this passes in some form there will still be areas that won’t be able to get people from inside our ranks to do these jobs... they will have to hire from the outside...
This needs to be a sticky. Make it your tag line. It speaks volumes. It is exactly what is going on man.Greed. By both the union and company
Union gets more pension money and the company gets cheaper labor
I prefer "screw you guys I am going home"This needs to be a sticky. Make it your tag line. It speaks volumes. It is exactly what is going on man.
So what happens if all inside part timers in a building turn it down and they hire several of the street, will these off the street hires bump the part timers off their shift?542... even if this passes in some form there will still be areas that won’t be able to get people from inside our ranks to do these jobs... they will have to hire from the outside...there are just too many variables about these jobs... but I definitely don’t like that there probably isn’t any language to state that they can’t use them for 5 days of straight driving.... that’s not ok.. if we agree to this hybrid it’s so their main job is inside to help with the high pt turnover and if available then maybe get a day or maybe 2 of driving... if there’s no language in there pertaining to that then I’m voting NO....
This needs to be a sticky. Make it your tag line. It speaks volumes. It is exactly what is going on man.
I said I could do better than you being severely hung over. I never said I was an expert, just an old S O B who’s lived a full life and then some.@Tony Q thinks 22.4s are the best the Union can do. And I believe him as he says he’s an expert negotiator!
Do us all a favor and find another job.So what happens if all inside part timers in a building turn it down and they hire several of the street, will these off the street hires bump the part timers off their shift?