THE TRUMP 2024 THREAD

[Box Ox]

It was the policy since Biden to use Signal for discussions like that.

They immediately installed it on the computers. Fishy

I could see it being used for something like asking who the left the tuna in the floor refrigerator for a week.

 

[oldngray]

Biden's people used Signal to coordinate/internally communicate military operations?

There wasn't any coordination or specific details in that chat. They even mentioned when the topic started to touch on sensitive details they would switch to a more secure service.

 

[Thebrownblob]

No it wasn’t. The he Biden admin specifically said to use it sparingly. It is supposed to be used to message people to tell them to check for information on their secured official devices

Government officials are not supposed to be talking my about official government matters with an auto deleting feature of messages

Really don’t think you understand what you’re talking about.

Biden-era guidance encouraged use of Signal app by highly-targeted govt officials: 'Best practice' - FOX8

A Biden-era Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) best guidance document shows highly-targeted government employees were encouraged to use Signal. Read More

www.fox8tv.com

 

[UnionStrong]

I’m pretty sure they know.

Although I will say Trump has a pretty bad habit of hiring these inside the beltway rats. Sure they seem to have experience and know what to do. They also know how to set people up and create problems for your administration because they know the ins and outs of the bureaucracy..

You found out about his wife with a Google search. You don’t think Trumps people didn’t vett Waltz, his wife, his family, his in dog? I’m saying this looks like a fishing expedition for the real culprit.

 

[oldngray]

No it wasn’t. The he Biden admin specifically said to use it sparingly. It is supposed to be used to message people to tell them to check for information on their secured official devices

Government officials are not supposed to be talking my about official government matters with an auto deleting feature of messages

Senator Mark Warner used Signal to meet with Russia Collusion hoaxer Christopher Steele.

Yep. Democrats are such hypocrites…
Senator Mark Warner (VA) used Signal to meet with the disgraced Christopher Steele to obtain the Steele Dossier. pic.twitter.com/1Vkx3CsEn4

Predictable: The Atlantic Praised Signal App as the “Gold Standard” in 2017 and Admitted Obama, Hillary and Trump Staffers All Used It | Lou Dobbs

The Atlantic praised Signal app and reported Obama, Hillary and Trump staffers all used it not too long ago. It wasn’t that long ago that Democrats praised Signal App as the “gold standard” of encrypted messaging. It was The Atlantic that published the report praising Signal and in the report...

loudobbs.com

 

[UnionStrong]

There wasn't any coordination or specific details in that chat. They even mentioned when the topic started to touch on sensitive details they would switch to a more secure service.

Yes

 

[Doublestandards]

Could be, but I don’t believe any of that happened and I don’t believe it was an unauthorized device or an unauthorized application. Quite the opposite.

If it was an authorized and secure application for communication, then how did an unorganized and non secure person get in there? And did no one else notice?

If no sensitive or classified information was being discussed, then why is it a big deal that the reporter was in there, why has everyone been lying and “misremembering” and why does that mean waltz and his wife are “in on it” and hate Trump?

 

[Doublestandards]

Senator Mark Warner used Signal to meet with Russia Collusion hoaxer Christopher Steele.

Predictable: The Atlantic Praised Signal App as the “Gold Standard” in 2017 and Admitted Obama, Hillary and Trump Staffers All Used It | Lou Dobbs

The Atlantic praised Signal app and reported Obama, Hillary and Trump staffers all used it not too long ago. It wasn’t that long ago that Democrats praised Signal App as the “gold standard” of encrypted messaging. It was The Atlantic that published the report praising Signal and in the report...

loudobbs.com

Yes that is much different and not close to what happened now

 

[oldngray]

Yes that is much different and not close to what happened now

Agreed. The Dems were worse.

 

[Doublestandards]

Agreed. The Dems were worse.

How so?

 

[oldngray]

How so?

Because this was a nothingburger. Despite the attempts to make it a talking point. No way a reporter should have been there but nothing classified was discussed and Waltz should lose his job for it.

 

[Box Ox]

Michael Waltz’s Venmo Is Public, and It’s Full of Journalists

The figure who tagged a journalist into a Signal chat about the attack on Yemen also failed to set his Venmo to private, revealing his willingness to engage with reporters of all political stripes.

prospect.org

"Whether Waltz has fully learned his lesson seems to be more of an open question, especially given the Prospect’s discovery that his personal Venmo account remains public, with some 300 “friends” actively listed on his profile. And while Goldberg doesn’t appear in Waltz’s Venmo contact list, several other journalists do, according to a Prospect review."

 

[Thebrownblob]

If it was an authorized and secure application for communication, then how did an unorganized and non secure person get in there? And did no one else notice?

If no sensitive or classified information was being discussed, then why is it a big deal that the reporter was in there, why has everyone been lying and “misremembering” and why does that mean waltz and his wife are “in on it” and hate Trump?

Mike waltz lol it’s just that simple. Mike is lying that he did not have Goldbergs information on his phone. It’s a pretty obvious lie. I don’t know if he hates Trump or not, but that’s just my opinion on the matter.. once you’re caught lying, you cannot be trusted when you’re in an organization.

 

[oldngray]

Mike waltz lol it’s just that simple

Wait for the Dems to suddenly be big Waltz supporters

 

[Doublestandards]

Because this was a nothingburger. Despite the attempts to make it a talking point. No way a reporter should have been there but nothing classified was discussed and Waltz should lose his job for it.

So why was it “worse when the Dems did it” when your example was someone using it to meet up with someone, the way the government recommends it to be used?

 

[Thebrownblob]

Wait for the Dems to suddenly be big Waltz supporters

Yep, you can already feel it coming

 

[Doublestandards]

Mike waltz lol it’s just that simple. Mike is lying that he did not have Goldbergs information on his phone. It’s a pretty obvious lie. I don’t know if he hates Trump or not, but that’s just my opinion on the matter.. once you’re caught lying, you cannot be trusted when you’re in an organization.

Why is it such a big deal that the reporter was added if nobody was doing anything wrong?

 

[Thebrownblob]

Why is it such a big deal that the reporter was added if nobody was doing anything wrong?

You don’t understand why it’s a big deal that one of your trusted inner circle is lying? I don’t think you really have a clue what you’re talking about here you don’t understand how any of this works. Like I’ve said all along it’s really not about what was said, it’s about someone was lying and it appears it’s Mike waltz

 

[Doublestandards]

You don’t understand why it’s a big deal that one of your trusted inner circle is lying? I don’t think you really have a clue what you’re talking about here you don’t understand how any of this works. Like I’ve said all along it’s really not about what was said, it’s about someone was lying and it appears it’s Mike waltz

Again, why is it a big deal a reporter was added if nobody was doing anything wrong and they weren’t talking about anything classified or sensitive?

You’re saying it’s a conspiracy and they hate Trump, but how do you come to that conclusion while also saying they weren’t doing anything wrong?

 

[Thebrownblob]

Again, why is it a big deal a reporter was added if nobody was doing anything wrong and they weren’t talking about anything classified or sensitive?

L O L I really don’t have time to respond if you don’t understand why it would be a problem. Been part of plenty of organizations, and if I did that, I would be gone tomorrow without trust you have nothing.