THE TRUMP 2024 THREAD

vantexan

Well-Known Member
I don’t feel you acknowledged, I think you’re doing a very weak what aboutism, and I would respect your view a lot more if you gave even a fraction of concern to this case

You’re talking about Hillary Clinton talking on a private server and deleting the messages is a confern, but administration officials talking on a non secure server about imminent military strikes is being overblown. If this was the exact same story in the Biden administration you guys would be freaking out and finding a way to blame it on dei
I don't know what a "confern" is, but the Secretary of State having top secret documents on a private, unsecured server while taking in huge sums of money, hiding what she did from Congress, is exponentially bigger than this one off issue. I've already said this situation should be investigated and if anyone did something illegal they should be held accountable. Never ceases to amaze me that y'all can ignore Hillary, can ignore Joe's influence peddling, Joe's obvious senility, the letting in of over 12 million people unvetted, violating the Constitution doing so, causing women to get raped and murdered, yet act like your hair is on fire about something like this.
 
Last edited:

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
You wouldn’t consider talking about imminent military strikes as classified or sensitive information?

You think it would have been fine for them to be tweeting each other that publicly?
You still haven’t answer my question of where these attacks were going to happen. What were the coordinates and what was the target? If that information was not in these texts, what good would it do anybody?
 

Doublestandards

Well-Known Member
You still haven’t answer my question of where these attacks were going to happen. What were the coordinates and what was the target? If that information was not in these texts, what good would it do anybody?
Dude come on. They said when and who the bombs were targeting

“This is definitely when the bombs are dropping”

You absolutely would not be defending this as strongly if it happened under the Biden administration
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
You wouldn’t consider talking about imminent military strikes as classified or sensitive information?

You think it would have been fine for them to be tweeting each other that publicly?
Have you asked yet why Jeffrey Goldberg published this instead of contacting the government and letting them know he was inadvertently getting these messages? Give them a chance to fix the problem? Are you interested in a unified country moving forward or do you just want to bring Trump and Republicans down with anything you can find?
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
Dude come on. They said when and who the bombs were targeting

“This is definitely when the bombs are dropping”

You absolutely would not be defending this as strongly if it happened under the Biden administration
So you don’t have a location? OK exactly it was an outline of what was going to happen perfectly acceptable for signal.
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
Have you asked yet why Jeffrey Goldberg published this instead of contacting the government and letting them know he was inadvertently getting these messages? Give them a chance to fix the problem? Are you interested in a unified country moving forward or do you just want to bring Trump and Republicans down with anything you can find?
He also published it because he’s well aware it is not top-secret information. Otherwise he would be facing some serious criminal penalties. Ask Snowden.

This is no more than embarrassing conversation that shouldn’t have been made public, but was because of Mike Walz
 

UnionStrong

Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
And then ultimately the president. This is not top-secret information time to move along.
Exactly. This frenzy highlights the fact that this administration has been open and transparent. The press is literally starving for anything that will hurt Trump. He fights them with truth and light.
 

Doublestandards

Well-Known Member
Have you asked yet why Jeffrey Goldberg published this instead of contacting the government and letting them know he was inadvertently getting these messages? Give them a chance to fix the problem? Are you interested in a unified country moving forward or do you just want to bring Trump and Republicans down with anything you can find?
He waited and did hand it over.
 

Doublestandards

Well-Known Member
He also published it because he’s well aware it is not top-secret information. Otherwise he would be facing some serious criminal penalties. Ask Snowden.

This is no more than embarrassing conversation that shouldn’t have been made public, but was because of Mike Walz
If it’s not secret information why did the CIA ask him to redact certain parts?
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
So you don’t have a location? OK exactly it was an outline of what was going to happen perfectly acceptable for signal.
We're focusing on the specific text instead of acknowledging that Goldberg shouldn't have been included. What could have been discussed in the future if Goldberg had remained silent? Of course he knew he had something he could win points attacking them over. Guess they should be glad he didn't remain silent and take notes.
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
Exactly. This frenzy highlights the fact that this administration has been open and transparent. The press is literally starving for anything that will hurt Trump. He fights them with truth and light.
The left can continue to hate him and that’s perfectly fine and I think it’s good to hold peoples feet to the fire, but this guy has 100% declassified more items than any president in recent history democracy dies in the darkness.
 

Doublestandards

Well-Known Member
We're focusing on the specific text instead of acknowledging that Goldberg shouldn't have been included. What could have been discussed in the future if Goldberg had remained silent? Of course he knew he had something he could win points attacking them over. Guess they should be glad he didn't remain silent and take notes.
Which brings up my point. If they weren’t doing anything wrong, it shouldn’t be such a big deal he was included. There shouldn’t be conspiracies about him being a Trump hater

They lied about this continuously along the way

“Nobody texted about war plans” then we learn they talked about exactly when bombs we’re going to be dropping, when American aircraft were taking off, and still there are parts that the CIA requested to be redacted
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
Not true. All of the Trumpees would have seen the now-published content of the Signal chat and said "You know what? No big deal here. Don't see what the fuss from some is all about." :)
Perhaps although I don’t know what the fuss is about as I have no idea what you could’ve done with any of that information. It was so unspecific. The attack already happened and I’m still not sure what half of it means.
 

UnionStrong

Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
The left can continue to hate him and that’s perfectly fine and I think it’s good to hold peoples feet to the fire, but this guy has 100% declassified more items than any president in recent history democracy dies in the darkness.
I don’t believe Trump would knowingly harm this country. He’s like a rough version of Reagan. He has this country’s best interests in his heart.
 
Top