THE TRUMP 2024 THREAD

[vantexan]

Which brings up my point. If they weren’t doing anything wrong, it shouldn’t be such a big deal he was included. There shouldn’t be conspiracies about him being a Trump hater

They lied about this continuously along the way

“Nobody texted about war plans” then we learn they talked about exactly when bombs we’re going to be dropping, when American aircraft were taking off, and still there are parts that the CIA requested to be redacted

He's a proven Trump hater. No conspiracy there.

 

[Thebrownblob]

I don’t believe Trump would knowingly harm this country. He’s like a rough version of Reagan. He has this country’s best interests in his heart.

I tend to agree with you and it’s really not a far stretch to understand that in the frenzy of hiring people to all these positions there’s gonna be some rotten eggs in there

 

[Doublestandards]

Why did he wait? Why did he publish the story?

You’re asking why he waited to announce imminent military strikes before the public knew about them?

 

[Doublestandards]

He's a proven Trump hater. No conspiracy there.

Waltz is? That’s who I was talking about

 

[vantexan]

You’re asking why he waited to announce imminent military strikes before the public knew about them?

Why did he wait instead of immediately contacting the Feds and letting them know he was getting texts he shouldn't? There, spelled it out for you.

 

[vantexan]

Waltz is? That’s who I was talking about

I'm talking about Goldberg. My mistake.

 

[Doublestandards]

And let’s just say it’s true that waltz is a Trump hater

If they weren’t doing anything wrong, and they weren’t discussing any sensitive or classified information, why would it be SO bad for that reporter to accidentally be added in the chat?

 

[UnionStrong]

Not true. All of the Trumpees would have seen the now-published content of the Signal chat and said "You know what? No big deal here. Don't see what the fuss from some is all about."

Trumpees? Really? It’s not about Trump, it’s about American exceptionalism. That’s what draws you, and me. Not the man, the idea of this country.

 

[Box Ox]

The left can continue to hate him and that’s perfectly fine and I think it’s good to hold peoples feet to the fire, but this guy has 100% declassified more items than any president in recent history democracy dies in the darkness.

I don’t believe Trump would knowingly harm this country. He’s like a rough version of Reagan. He has this country’s best interests in his heart.

Even if he would he certainly wouldn't try to do so by letting the ing Houthis in on our plans to take out their little bases.

 

[vantexan]

And let’s just say it’s true that waltz is a Trump hater

If they weren’t doing anything wrong, and they weren’t discussing any sensitive or classified information, why would it be SO bad for that reporter to accidentally be added in the chat?

Do you think they should've let him stay on the text circle?

 

[Doublestandards]

Why did he wait instead of immediately contacting the Feds and letting them know he was getting texts he shouldn't? There, spelled it out for you.

How do you know he didn’t?

This all came two hours before the attacks

Its amazing how your twisting it into the reporter being the bad guy in this situation

 

[Doublestandards]

Do you think they should've let him stay on the text circle?

I don’t think they should because I believe it was sensitive and classified information

You seem to believe it wasn’t a big deal and not sensitive information, so I’ll ask you the same question, do you think they should’ve let him stay on the text circle?

 

[vantexan]

How do you know he didn’t?

This all came two hours before the attacks

Its amazing how your twisting it into the reporter being the bad guy in this situation

Everyone involved in this debacle is the bad guy. And I'm not talking about everyone on that text circle. Someone either screwed up, or did it on purpose. If they did it on purpose then the reporter as you call him would have to be investigated as possibly part of a criminal conspiracy. I'm not twisting anything. Just wondering why you ignore some huge problems in the past from Democrats while acting like this one incident could cause the end of the country?

 

[Box Ox]

I'm glad we're going ahead and getting some of this stuff tackled before it's time to roll with China over Taiwan. That's gonna be far more serious and they'll be very good at exploiting our weaknesses.

 

[Doublestandards]

Everyone involved in this debacle is the bad guy. And I'm not talking about everyone on that text circle. Someone either screwed up, or did it on purpose. If they did it on purpose then the reporter as you call him would have to be investigated as possibly part of a criminal conspiracy. I'm not twisting anything. Just wondering why you ignore some huge problems in the past from Democrats while acting like this one incident could cause the end of the country?

I don’t ignore problems in the past from democrats. I’ve criticized democrats plenty on here

I ask you again like you asked me, You seem to believe it wasn’t a big deal and not sensitive information, so I’ll ask you the same question, do you think they should’ve let him stay on the text circle?

 

[vantexan]

I don’t think they should because I believe it was sensitive and classified information

You seem to believe it wasn’t a big deal and not sensitive information, so I’ll ask you the same question, do you think they should’ve let him stay on the text circle?

If the government tells me the info shared was no big deal then why should I question it?

4 years of a senile old president bumbling around while Dems tell us he's as sharp as a tack and out works everyone.

4 years of the Biden administration telling us the border is secure while millions stream across with many serious crimes committed that got people harmed, even murdered.

One incident that didn't result in anyone getting killed, apparently a mistake. Dems: AIIIIEEEEEE!!!!!!!

 

[vantexan]

I don’t ignore problems in the past from democrats. I’ve criticized democrats plenty on here

I ask you again like you asked me, You seem to believe it wasn’t a big deal and not sensitive information, so I’ll ask you the same question, do you think they should’ve let him stay on the text circle?

Of course not. He doesn't have clearance. And your honor you need to note that I've already said several times that the matter needs to be investigated and if anyone did something illegal they should be held accountable. How many times do I have to say that? And I don't see you going after Dems at all. Certainly not with the enthusiasm you're displaying here.

 

[Doublestandards]

If the government tells me the info shared was no big deal then why should I question it?

Of course not. He doesn't have clearance.

which one is it? You’re not thinking logically, you’re being very biased here

 

[vantexan]

which one is it? You’re not thinking logically, you’re being very biased here

The info shared doesn't matter in this instance your honor. What matters is someone without clearance gained access. That's a security violation and needs to be addressed.

 

[Doublestandards]

The info shared doesn't matter in this instance your honor. What matters is someone without clearance gained access. That's a security violation and needs to be addressed.

If the information shared doesn’t matter, wasn’t sensitive and wasn’t classified, why would he need clearance to see it?