Say, for a second that one of YOUR "family" members were BEHEADED by "ISIS". Now, if you WERE able to capture "them", what would "you" DO to them?
I would torture and slowly murder every member of their family, record it, and show it to them, playing in a continuous loop on 360 degrees of TV screens, in picture perfect clarity.
Fox news didn't even tell me to do that, I came up with it all on my own
I read a "debriefing" from my Grandfather after he was freed from his POW camp in North Korea from 1953... he was there at that time for 3 1/2 years.. waterboarding??? that's all you got?
I guess we can consider you "lawless" then, right? Eye for an Eye in face of the law?
So I completely understand you, our country signs an agreement with the Geneva Convention that prohibits ANY kind of interrogation considered ABHORRENT or TORTUROUS, signed by President Ronald Reagan, and you are willing to disregard the law despite its defined and clear intentions and continue to invent "circumstances" that allow the practice?
Cause you understand that ANY excuse you can come up with is a "circumstance", right?
The agreement with the Geneva Convention states:
"No exceptional circumstances whatsoever, whether a state of war or a threat or war, internal political instability or any other public emergency, may be invoked as a justification of torture" and "an order from a superior officer or a public authority may not be invoked as a justification of torture" (Art. 2 (2-3))."
The United States agreed that NO CIRCUMSTANCE whatsoever could be used, yet you and the others continue to create "circumstances" that justify it.
You cant make justifications out of emotions.
Just as you dont like beheadings, americans dont like americans acting like animals. The BUSH administration broke the law. They should all be prosecuted for war crimes.
I have said this since DAY ONE of both wars.
Why doesnt FOX news talk about the legality of the law while pointing out the Geneva Convention agreement signed by Ronald Reagan?
They continue to push for EMOTIONS rather than point out the law. Every talking head comes out and speaks just like YOU. Using EMOTION for decision making.
Its the programming that they do on a daily basis.
Hopefully you dont consider yourself above the law, but somehow, I gather that "laws" mean nothing to you considering your racists admissions.
TOS.
I think citizens that don't know about war shouldn't comment on it.
/out
Exactly. Same goes for those who didnt realize that President Reagan signed an agreement outlawing torture of any kind for any excuse.
TOS.
So, please tell is how you would get the info from terrorists.Exactly. Same goes for those who didnt realize that President Reagan signed an agreement outlawing torture of any kind for any excuse.
TOS.
So, please tell is how you would get the info from terrorists.
...I would torture and slowly murder every member of their family, record it, and show it to them, playing in a continuous loop on 360 degrees of TV screens, in picture perfect clarity.
Fox news didn't even tell me to do that, I came up with it all on my own
Dude, you are one sick ****, just saying.
Would he still talk the talk?
TOS.
I guess we can consider you "lawless" then, right? Eye for an Eye in face of the law?
So I completely understand you, our country signs an agreement with the Geneva Convention that prohibits ANY kind of interrogation considered ABHORRENT or TORTUROUS, signed by President Ronald Reagan, and you are willing to disregard the law despite its defined and clear intentions and continue to invent "circumstances" that allow the practice?
Cause you understand that ANY excuse you can come up with is a "circumstance", right?
The agreement with the Geneva Convention states:
"No exceptional circumstances whatsoever, whether a state of war or a threat or war, internal political instability or any other public emergency, may be invoked as a justification of torture" and "an order from a superior officer or a public authority may not be invoked as a justification of torture" (Art. 2 (2-3))."
The United States agreed that NO CIRCUMSTANCE whatsoever could be used, yet you and the others continue to create "circumstances" that justify it.
You cant make justifications out of emotions.
Just as you dont like beheadings, americans dont like americans acting like animals. The BUSH administration broke the law. They should all be prosecuted for war crimes.
I have said this since DAY ONE of both wars.
Why doesnt FOX news talk about the legality of the law while pointing out the Geneva Convention agreement signed by Ronald Reagan?
They continue to push for EMOTIONS rather than point out the law. Every talking head comes out and speaks just like YOU. Using EMOTION for decision making.
Its the programming that they do on a daily basis.
Hopefully you dont consider yourself above the law, but somehow, I gather that "laws" mean nothing to you considering your racists admissions.
TOS.
Truman was the signer of the treaty during Korea...
It turns out, torture is the least effective way to gain information.
But, you know, yay torture!
Clowns.
I don't give a darn about what Reagan signed. Terrorists need their butts kicked. Sorry Ronald, but the times they are a changin'
Funny how BUSH breaks the law regarding enhanced interrogation, but nobody says a word while OBAMA goes about his merry way zapping folks with Hellfire missiles fired from Predators and Global Hawks. Not that I have a problem with it, but Obama backers don't seem to either. Pick a freakin lane. I'm sure Obama doesn't have a 100% record on killing only the guilty. I'm sure his drone strikes have targeted people who were innocent, including civilians. So be it, I say. Personally, I would only apply the protections of the Geneva conventions to uniformed, professional soldiers, sailors, airmen. These are terrorists. These guys would gladly blow any of us up. They'd rape our sisters and daughters just as soon as they'd behead our brothers and sons.
Ps. Bomb Iran's nuke program. That's gonna become a problem nobody wants.
Were the people captured and interrogated a member of the armed forces of a nation that signed the Geneva conventions, or beyond that were they a member of a recognized military faction?
No group which we call a terrorist organization has signed the Geneva conventions, much less are they a military faction of nations that have signed. On top of that they do not have any distinctive signs, insignias or uniforms that would designate them as a member of an armed forces group, which eliminates any protections under the Geneva conventions that would be provided towards a regulated armed force that professes allegiance towards a government or authority that may not be a signatory of the conventions.