Trump Picks Kavanaugh for SCOTUS (not Hardiman)
- Thread starter Old Man Jingles
- Start date
Where Diana Ross plays basketball?
Jkloc420
Do you need an air compressor or tire gauge
the singer
Yaba Daba Do
Donkey Punch Extraordinaire
A lot of people think overturning it would prohibit abortions all together. The decision would just go back to the states like it always should have been.
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
Privacy is not a states rights issue.
Yaba Daba Do
Donkey Punch Extraordinaire
First let me just start off by saying that a right to privacy is the most nonsensical of all arguements for allowing a person to kill their baby. Abortion was a states rights issue before it went to the Supreme Court and if the court were to overturn the decision it would go back to the states. Abortion would not be outlawed across the country. lawmakers in every state would make their own rules about when, where and under what circumstances women could obtain abortions And there is not a chance that any of the solid liberal states such as California, Washington, New York, etc would ever ban abortion.
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
Because you know better than the supreme Court.... Mkay buddy, sure, lol.
Killing babies is not legal. If you want to call an unviable fetus a baby because it makes your losing argument sound better, more power to you. It's still a losing argument against privacy though.
I respect your opinion and your right to not have an abortion.
Yaba Daba Do
Donkey Punch Extraordinaire
The decision was made by activist judges not people that took the law into account. There is no logical connection between someone’s personal privacy and actions that harm someone other than ones self. None
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
Unviable fetus is not a someone.
Yaba Daba Do
Donkey Punch Extraordinaire
When does a life begin? Is it when the baby is actually born? Would it be okay to have an abortion at say 8 months?
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
No. Maybe you should read roe v wade before arguing against it, then you wouldn't have to ask silly questions.
Yaba Daba Do
Donkey Punch Extraordinaire
The Supreme Court has held that
No, I’m asking you when you think a life begins.
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
By a scientific definition, sperm qualify as "life", so I guess that's a which came first chicken or egg kind of question.
Yaba Daba Do
Donkey Punch Extraordinaire
Well it sounds like you think it is after the first trimester (84 days). Do you think an abortion at say 80 or 83 days is okay but at 85 it is not?
Yaba Daba Do
Donkey Punch Extraordinaire
Is a corporation a someone? The Supreme Court has ruled that corporations are “persons” within the meaning of the 14th amendment.
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
What is this 20 questions?
Do you think you are Socrates?
Why don't you make your point already?
There can be as much as half a billion sperm in a healthy guy's ejaculation. By your reasoning a man commits mass murder every time he ejaculates. That's silly. An independent life is created at the point an egg and a sperm unite. Takes two to tango. Whether the pregnancy can be prevented from going forward at that point is debatable. At the point where the fetus is being dismembered shouldn't be up for debate but sadly it's the law of the land.
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
No, by your reasoning it's mass murder. By my reasoning that life is unviable.
Last edited:
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
I respect your opinion and your right to not have an abortion.
Yaba Daba Do
Donkey Punch Extraordinaire
Well we got a little sidetracked. Whether or not abortion is moral or not is a separate issue. The point is that roe v wade is a case that was decided by activist judges with a political agenda. There is nothing in a persons right to privacy that gives them a right to an abortion that is just how they tried to justify the ruling.
Similar threads
