Trump will lose to Kamala?

Pullman Brown

Well-Known Member
IMG_4298.jpeg
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
It’s really more about grinding them down slowly if necessary to not escalate. There’s a middle path. But MAGA doesn’t understand that. They simultaneously want no war (Putin gets what he wants at a low cost) or for Biden to nail Putin to the wall (will still be criticized).

Adults will make this decision, thanks.
maga seemed to understand things pretty well when trump was president and things were quiet not to mention all the peace deals in the middle east.

since then rome is burning and Mr. Senile is not helping things.
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
They are in charge now. There were many in important positions for Trump, too, but there won’t be nearly as many willing to tell him “no” this time. God help us.
in charge of what?

poorly executed afghanistn withdrawl?
russian / ukranian war?
hamas attack on israel?
Iran and its surrogates attacking shipping lanes in the middle east?
closer to a nuclear conflict than ever before
china imposing its will all over the world?

what exactly are they in control of now?
 

Next Day Err

Well-Known Member
maga seemed to understand things pretty well when trump was president and things were quiet not to mention all the peace deals in the middle east.

since then rome is burning and Mr. Senile is not helping things.
MAGA was taking horse meds that didn’t work for a novel virus and dying in absurd numbers.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
Uh oh guys. Putin is using his mind tricks of war on the election. He has made his intentions known. That means we go opposite. I cannot believe this. Trump had this but but but we should not have bashed Biden so much. Leave Biden alone guys. Seriously, start praising the guy. This picture makes people desperate ⬇️
View attachment 491072
if either vile gangster trump or korrupt kamala get elected its gonna be bad for america, good for the rich.
 

Next Day Err

Well-Known Member
if either vile gangster trump or korrupt kamala get elected its gonna be bad for america, good for the rich.
Bro, it’s always good for the rich, in every 4 year period. Doesn't mean we should take lightly putting someone in the job who’s called for termination of the Constitution because he was butthurt we rejected him in ‘20.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
Bro, it’s always good for the rich, in every 4 year period. Doesn't mean we should take lightly putting someone in the job who’s called for termination of the Constitution because he was butthurt we rejected him in ‘20.
well thats one of hte reasons hes a vile gangster
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
The very old and frail, yes, at the height of the exponential growth of infection. It underscored how dangerous the virus was.

But don’t let me stop you from playing epidemiologist again.
Reciting known stats does not make one an epidemiologist. However if one's last name is Fauci you get to play one on tv.
 
Top