If Express is to be the model they use, then why are they making it smaller?
1 ) because for now Ground is the cash cow, but only that, significant as it is it does nothing for the preservation of the brand. Legal landscape, lawsuits, and the long-term outlook demands an employee model. They are only shrinking express now to fill their coffers, and raise the stock, only to later transition everyone to express later with much less liability.
Express has reduced the number of stations, purchased smaller vans, and operating with less employees over the past several years.
2) the original plan 8 years ago has now changed, but X sees the benefit in continuing with their plan by passing asset and capital expenditures on to the contractor, and reducing their debt by using less costly resources like the vans you mention. Fewer express employees now is a no trainer for X. They can capture more revenue by pushing more volume onto ground now, only to easily take it back later with far fewer problems and a cheaper work force.
As for stations, ground has been purchasing more stations as of late, and they are much larger than necessary, easily capturing all volume under one roof. You would be hard pressed to locate a recently new built express terminal, they are rendering them absolute.
If they were moving everything to Express, they would be buying bigger vans, keeping employees, and growing/expanding the number of Express locations.
3) they do not need to buy bigger vans now on any significant scale because they are going to continue to reduce your volume for the near future, thus continue to reduce your workforce. We will continue to Cary the heavy burden of purchasing large truck's, only to have X later purchase for book value. Expect however for X to make some large van purchases in the near future. There also will still be a need for the smaller vans you have that they will retain.
Understand the smartest plan would be to reduce their expenditures and lessen their exposure to liabilities now, then take everything back with turn key less costly work force that was paid for by the contractor........
Everything I have seen over the past few years does not indicate an Express model moving forward.
4) You are correct that everything to now indicates less reliance on express. X plan, text book!
I think there will be a day of one FedEx package system, but only when they get more Ground volume. On a UPS van, how much of the package volume is air, 2 day, 3 day and ground? I am going to guess that if their van had 100 stops, about 20 are air, 2 day, 3 day, the rest ground. When FedEx gets close to the same package mix as UPS is when they will get serious about combining the operations. If the mix now (I am guessing) is 60 Ground/40 Express, it would fail.
5) X would like to do this later, but time is shorter than anticipated, however ground currently captures close to 45% of the market, and express has the majority of the priority mail, combined it is comparable to UPS; meaning it is very doable. Density created buy combining services will increase efficiencies and reduce cost. Another thing, by the time this is done expect priority to lose market to ground, and ground to gain on UPS. Essentially X loses nothing only gains.
I feel that FedEx is learning how to combine operations by merging the Home Delivery with Ground. I have heard they are also combining Smartpost as well. They are learning now with these services to prepare/learn for the merging of Express.
6) my point exactly, they have figured out that combining services will be more beneficial. They just want to reduce their exposure, fatten the bank account, and preserve their brand, while having us pay for it with no recourse for us to have. Express is that avenue
I have seen nothing or heard of anything like this at Express from reading these boards for years.
7) when has X let anyone outside the devil's circle know what was really going to happen. The outcome would be a disaster. They will make the contractor believe business as usual, express employees complacent with job security, while implementing this plan right in front of our face.
I know that combining Express will not be like these merges, but they are not guessing at what has to happen. They will have all the information on what the contractors and their drivers will have to learn and complete to accomplish it
.8) I agree, only the everyone in the end will be express, matter of fact they will probably drop the express name and go only with Fedex, all under the employee model.
RPS, then Ground has rolled with the changing laws and regulations of contractors and will continue for as long as they can with this model.
9) political landscape will change with the upcoming election. Public sentiment, and customer dissatisfaction will become unmanageable, lawsuits in every state will continue to damage the brand, the time is basically up.
I don't see that changing or they would not be going through the ISP changes.
10) ISP is diversion, another way to continue milking the contractors and skirt the laws. Buys them more time with no consequences at the end from canceling or discontinuing the model. X will blame it on regulatory pressures.
Ground is expanding; 6 day deliveries, larger and more locations. They are growing Ground and shrinking Express.
11) Making room for express volume for now, express people for later. Express already works 6 days, however work days are irrelevant.
THEY ARE GROWING GROUND, YES. I WOULD TO IF I WAS THEM. SHRINKING EXPRESS, SMART. THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHAT SERVICE WILL PERSEVERE. EVRYTHING TO DO WITH WHAT IS MENTIONED ABOVE.