With the stock bump Abney got 22%. The other top executives got less than him however still leaps and bounds over the 1.74% that we got!Oh I thought he meant management. Like ALL management like he implied.
With the stock bump Abney got 22%. The other top executives got less than him however still leaps and bounds over the 1.74% that we got!Oh I thought he meant management. Like ALL management like he implied.
I know UPS has no problem violating the contract but if they did so in this situation i don't really see the problem as long as the senior driver filed. The senior driver that wanted the OT would have the work taken off of him and get to go home earlier but still get paid for the hours worked of the junior driver that took the work as long as he files. Sounds like a win win to me.Like I said they will abuse this. You should know this. Violate the contract and maybe pay out on some grievances, if they get filed.
Abney's total compensation in 2016 was $13.7 million so if he got a 22% bump that would be $16,714,000 total. I'm okay with taking him down to zero and giving to the hourly's but i don't see it solving much of anything. But still i'd be happy with an extra $66.85With the stock bump Abney got 22%. The other top executives got less than him however still leaps and bounds over the 1.74% that we got!
How did you come up with 1.74% ?With the stock bump Abney got 22%. The other top executives got less than him however still leaps and bounds over the 1.74% that we got!
A ground driver making 20% less than us is not a win.I know UPS has no problem violating the contract but if they did so in this situation i don't really see the problem as long as the senior driver filed. The senior driver that wanted the OT would have the work taken off of him and get to go home earlier but still get paid for the hours worked of the junior driver that took the work as long as he files. Sounds like a win win to me.
How much should they make at their inside job?A ground driver making 20% less than us is not a win.
How much in $ more is totally dependent on total compensation!I'm saying we are right around inflation. If you think we should fight and go on strike for another .5% I at least understand where you are coming from but the way I read it not only from you but from many others on here is that you think the $4.15 is an insult and I don't see it that way. I'm curious as to how much you think we should get?
A driver on the 0.5 list with a 10 hour Wed might have be instructed to give rest of stops to a Jr. driver just so they can over-load him either Thurs or Friday. grievance was filed and Sr. driver lostIf the senior driver is on the 9.5 list then he is saying he doesn't want to work more than 9.5 hours and they are accommodating him. I don't see the problem with sending a senior driver help that has already said he does not want the OT. If the senior driver was not on the 9.5 list and wanted the OT and the junior driver already had his 8 in and was on OT as well then the senior driver could file.
I didn't realize you were talking about hybrid drivers. I was under the impression that we were talking about regular low seniority drivers.A ground driver making 20% less than us is not a win.
I agree completely. We don't know what the increases are to Health and Welfare and pension but they did say there were increases. We are getting 2.2% in hourly wages alone and I'd be willing to bet we get at least that extra .5 or .6% in Helath and Welfare and pension increases.How much in $ more is totally dependent on total compensation!
I don’t know the actual break down of each year. So I quickly took my wage which is $36.16 and divided it by $4.15 and again by a 5 year contract. So my first raise will average out to be 1.74%How did you come up with 1.74% ?
I fully support stronger 9.5 language and stiffer penalties for all violations of the contract. There needs to be incentive for them to not violate the contract.How much in $ more is totally dependent on total compensation!
A driver on the 0.5 list with a 10 hour Wed might have be instructed to give rest of stops to a Jr. driver just so they can over-load him either Thurs or Friday. grievance was filed and Sr. driver lost
my wage is $36.29 and $4.15 is 11.4%. Divide that by 5 and it is a 2.3% increase each year in just hourly wages.I don’t know the actual break down of each year. So I quickly took my wage which is $36.16 and divided it by $4.15 and again by a 5 year contract. So my first raise will average out to be 1.74%
I didn't start the thread.It seems like you know all the answers so why did you post this thread.
To show off your superiority?
That sounds about right. But some make more than you so the percentages will be a bit less.my wage is $36.29 and $4.15 is 11.4%. Divide that by 5 and it is a 2.3% increase each year in just hourly wages.
Sorry. That's what I meantI didn't realize you were talking about hybrid drivers. I was under the impression that we were talking about regular low seniority drivers.
you are a communistSorry. That's what I meant
PS, u missed the part where I worked past midnight that next day to empty out my truck... add another 20 stops in half an hour, butt 25 miles speeding to knock it out since I'm the only one on the road that night/morning...Orion, your heaviest day was 190 packages. I didn't have less than 300 once last week. Furthermore, more than three times last week I had over 200 stops and never once had less than 40 signatures or CIR's!
One of the FedEx trucks on my route has 2 people in it on a weekly basis. I am sure its used for training. When 1 see 2 in that truck I know for a fact later in the day they will "conveniently" be at one of my stops and I always see 1 guy pointing at my truck when I open the rear door or bulkhead door. I then hear an, "Oh my god," or, "damn!" I am sure the conversation then goes: 1. "see it could be worse, you could work for brown." or 2. "Aren't you glad its never that bad."
With the hybrid drivers there would have to be clear limitations and penalties stiff enough that make it not worth it for the company to violate the contract. That is my biggest problem with every contract, the penalties are meant to be a slap on the wrist instead of a deterent. As long as the penalties were stiff enough and they couldn't replace regular driving jobs with these i would be okay with it as it would give employees more flexibility and more options on their way to becoming regular drivers if that's what they want. Like you said though the company abuses everything and makes it impossible to trust them.Sorry. That's what I meant
Wish it kinda worked that way....The first year's raise is 2.3% but then the following years it gets progressively smaller. And that is just with the assumption the $4.15 is divided equally for each of the 5 years! Meanwhile, inflation keeps on keeping on.my wage is $36.29 and $4.15 is 11.4%. Divide that by 5 and it is a 2.3% increase each year in just hourly wages.