Wow, I'm a little behind! Let's see....
This upsets you?
... I do know I'd be livid if I was on the call-in list and wasn't called
, how would you feel if you were on that list and could really use the extra jack? Seriously man, were people called and they all refused to come in or did the friend/t mgmt decide to
everybody and say hey, the report'll look good
. Please step back and do some research, please tell me I'm wrong and it was the former and not the latter. Hondo
Nope, not gonna tell you're wrong, Hondo. The Sunday start for my sort is really a pain in the A** because of the number of call-ins. That's when its
really bad. My understanding is that for Sunday, people just don't show for double-shifting. Is
that management's fault??? I'm not upset at the steward for protecting hourlies as far as double-shifting. I'm more upset at him for trying to drag
me into his fight with UPS management.
Tie you know the sups work no matter if the area is staffed or not! But you want to piss and moan that the sups are working because of staffing, B.S! They work to make the numbers look better.
Yes and no, Red. In Denver, some will work
only to help an hourly--pulling irregs, for one. Another might hop into a container 10 minutes before downtime to try to clear it. The steward happened to see that one and told the supervisor to stop.
Livid doesn't even describe the supervisor's face. Sometimes sups will work because of staffing. It's getting to the point on my sort--Sunday start--that
I'm getting p*ssed off because of the number of call-ins. By the way, Red, I
did get written-up today--with a steward present--for being late twice in the last two weeks. I signed a sheet in the binder. I'm told the write-up would never stand up in a grievance hearing but I'm not going there. I made a
mistake and accepted
responsibility for it.
Yes hondo I do understand where the responsibility lies. The sup has half of her area missing in action. She now has to determine if they are just late or just absent no call. employers don't want the adversarial relationship. employees don't want to be beat into the adversarial relationship. Look at how you guys beat on rocky to push him to particiapate in the grieavance process.
Half an area? LMAO! Sorry, Tie, but I just had a flashback to the other day when 75% of an area didn't show--call in or no call. That was a really frustrating night. I had words with a p/t sup over it, by the way, Red. And thanks for the defense, Tie. Not
everyone likes to fight with management. The adversarial relationship is really a thing of the past--or it should be. And Red, I still refuse to participate in BULLSHINE grievances. Reasonable, accurate and grounded in reality grievances? ABSOULUTELY!!! I'm behind ya 100%.
Red I can honestly say that i have never had or seen where we worked sups because we wanted to make the numbers look better. I can honestly say they have worked when we either:
had too many quit, did not have enough show up for work or could not get enough to double shift when volume was heavy.
we want our sups running the areas, training, implementing quality control measures etc not loading cars.
This I would agree with. The sups on my sort are as bad as Red describes Chicago being. I've worked another sort and the guy seems to only work when he
has to. And Tie, the p/t sup I keep mentioning worked to make her numbers better. No other reason. She pretty much told me once that she was
ordered to work, a claim I just don't completely buy. Short-staffing is a routine occurence in this operation. Double-shifting isn't even enough to cover the vacations and call-ins. One side of the building looks like it went a round--a losing one, by the way--with a nuclear attack! This is
even with supervisors working and looking more like hourlies than supervisors!
Not in chicago my friend, maybe rocky can agree with this one. The onlt time they stop is when we get announced over the radio, because we do building sweeps as many as 20 agents and stewards together to stop this violation. I can tell you that 1 building here last novemeber paid out over $9,000 in sups working for the month PAID OUT!
Nope, I can not agree with this statement, sir. I
never saw this particular tactic at my suburban Chicago hub. I have a relative working in a Chicago hub and have never heard of this. I feel bad for him already but to have a BA come up and start screaming at him...I feel doubly bad. I'd honestly find it pretty amusing to see this effort in Denver
. The
only time I can recall a BA being in my Chicago hub--and I'm honestly certain they were there
much more--was when he screamed at a p/t sup to stop helping an hourly pull an irreg out of a container. They stop for the day when told by the steward here. It frustrated the h*ll out of the unload supervisor. I saw p/t and friend/t supervisors talking in hushed tones on catwalks, the p/t sup obviously quite angry. Sadly, Tie, it was amusing, though I personally never contributed to the frustration. -Rocky