upschuck
Well-Known Member
Do we still have to pay for socks in the new contract?
Not gonna happen. You alone would bankrupt the company.STRIKE!!
Do we still have to pay for socks in the new contract?
Not gonna happen. You alone would bankrupt the company.STRIKE!!
I've been saving in my 401k since I was a part timer...I'm no analyst but my portfolio looks pretty good so far...
Sent using BrownCafe App
So your are not a driver. You have no idea, you can guess and wander, but you do not even do my job. You just see your pay versus driver pay. I would feel bad for you having to work two jobs. Except we all did it.It isn't cherry picking if all you have to do is look at the people around you. I make almost 3 times what my girlfriend makes per hour. She's a soldier in the greatest military in the world with 3.5 years of service and I load trucks at UPS. My other job involves me reading a water meter and I make close to 5 times what she makes there. You make more than 10 times what she does per hour, in case you're curious. Five times more per year. Is your job five times harder than a soldier's?
Is it fine that you make what you make? Of course. God bless our union for getting those wages. I'm just trying to point out the blatant flaws in your "We are the hardest working. Nobody's got it worse than us." fallacy. So that maybe you can go through life not assuming that you are the world's martyr. Crucified on your UPS truck so that the rest of us can live kushy, comfortable existences. A little humility can go a long way towards fixing that feeling of persecution you have.
This post here is why you are a man of great wisdom and a friend.This is my 8th or 9th in a series of worst contracts ever. Somehow still keeping my head above water.
He Is the reason why we dont get ,turkeys anymore! I would tell you the reason, but I might violate the TOS!Not gonna happen. You alone would bankrupt the company.
Idk yet but I got years to figure it out...I didn't say I want to lose my pension, and if its gone I'm sure our union will negotiate its replacement! But as of right now this is all speculative!Good luck! Do you really think you could live off of it if you lost your pension? It seems that you're putting too much stock (pun intended) in your analytical mind.
The contract was passed for the following reasons:
Biggest percentage of hourlies wouldn't even take the 30 seconds to vote.
The ones that did vote yes, voted for the immediate financial gains. Look at all the the threads on "retro checks".
Its a sad day in my castle. I voted no. I did not want to go into an unsustainable HC plan. However, it is what it is.I excepted that fact long ago. That is not why I am sad. What I do not like, is the way the contract was pushed threw. The Union is broken. I hope after the next election, the leaders in place will pick up the pieces and find a way to get us on track to all of us standing tall side by side with our brothers.
I agreed with everything you said.The contract was passed for the following reasons:
Biggest percentage of hourlies wouldn't even take the 30 seconds to vote.
The ones that did vote yes, voted for the immediate financial gains. Look at all the the threads on "retro checks".
Its a sad day in my castle. I voted no. I did not want to go into an unsustainable HC plan. However, it is what it is.I excepted that fact long ago. That is not why I am sad. What I do not like, is the way the contract was pushed threw. The Union is broken. I hope after the next election, the leaders in place will pick up the pieces and find a way to get us on track to all of us standing tall side by side with our brothers.
Didn't we prove here in 804 that strikes may not be successful? By Old Guard, you mean Aged Protector? Would that make you a Young Deserter?I agreed with everything you said.
The only thing I will add is that if, and I mean if, the Old Guard manages to win, you can expect no changes to the way things are done at the marble palace.
We will still be a Teamsters Union that is afraid to even say the word "STRIKE" during a contract negotiation.
The contract was passed for the following reasons:
Biggest percentage of hourlies wouldn't even take the 30 seconds to vote.
Didn't we prove here in 804 that strikes may not be successful? By Old Guard, you mean Aged Protector? Would that make you a Young Deserter?
Just my speculation, but if the non voters were forced to vote, I believe most would vote yes. Be careful what you wish for.
You are assuming. You know what they say about people who assume?
Yeah, I know. That's what speculation means. KofC's "assumption" was that the contract passed because members didn't vote. Why did you give him a pass on his "assumption"?
Because I feel
Simple. TDU struck UPS. UPS held out. IBT brought all of us back.Your post says nothing. Come back when you have a better, more thought out, argument against what I have posted.
I will be waiting.
We have a big problem with this going on. I think it will lead to the demise of our once great union if this continues.
We must educate the union hourly employees on the issues of the proposed contracts of the future.
We must educate them to the importance of voting. Votes not cast show UPS the amount of apathy among the rank and file.
We can fight among ourselves, but when facing a UPS giant, we need to be unified. Unfortunately for us, we don't have someone who can unify us in charge right now.