upsman2940
Well-Known Member
Can't pay the bills with union dues from a ptimer.
Sounds like the UPS I know.It's good to see the fters have the same elitist attitude here as they do in my hub. Part time wages are pure garbage for the work we do. I work on the sort aisle and am lucky to get over 15 hours a week. I read on another thread here someone saying the contract guarantees you 3.5 or 4 hours or whatever, so just push to make sure you get those hours. I know first-hand if you try to do that it puts you on the bad side of every sup in the building. The only thing the sups care about is production after force-feeding you the safety garbage everyday. We actually have some pencil pusher watching us work 2-4 days a week and taking our names down for not treating every box like a new born baby. example: box was on ground. i bent over and slid it onto the belt with my hands slowly, as it went on the belt, it rolled onto its side. Said pencil pusher comes by and asks my name to take it down for mishandling.
Also, its a real laugh to read "it's our fault we are part time because its a choice". True story, i asked one time what it would take to become a fork lift operator in the building. I asked our union rep of the building who is a fork lifter. He said something along the lines of "when he, x, or x dies." Fact is, there are no ft jobs to be had. The people who get them (or any other decent position) don't want to leave them and there are no new positions higher then a pter sup opening up, which comes with its own risks in itself considering you aren't even union anymore and you lose half your benefits. It is far from a choice. I have personally seen 3 or 4 people leave after 4-5 years working their behinds off for peanuts as a pt trying to score that sweet driver job that is never gonna come along. Yet every driver I talk to complains about how they have too much work. And there are no new jobs becaaaauuuuse??? UPS is 100% about production, and use whatever methods are required to increase it, usually yelling at the workers and if that fails, the sups yell at each other. At least the fters get paid for their hassle. What do I get as a pter? some benefits that would be great if i had a family and wasn't just a single healthy young male like 80% of the other pters? I've been there 2.5 years (yes i know in the grand scheme of things that isn't very long) and i'm still behind many people to even get a pt sup position, let alone a ft position. At this point I think it might be better to just cut my losses and work somewhere else. I could probably get hired at costco with a starting pay of 12 or 13 dollars (im at 11.50 lol), actually get the minimum they promise to employees (25 hours) and the job would be so much easier. Maybe almost as hectic, but not nearly as hard. If only I didn't turn them down in my first 6 months at ups when I was allured with the prospect of a part time sup position when I told them I was going to quit to work there. Suffice to say, they still haven't attempted to help me get that position.
so what I would like to see?
1.more ft jobs.
2.higher pt pay.
3.actually following through with the minimum hour per week requirements or at least hiring enough people to do the workload in the time they expect at a reasonable pace so I'm not working as hard as I can to still get yelled at.
The only thing loss of membership through RTW legislation would produce is less negotiation power resulting in pay and work conditions even lesser than what exists today. Locals would be the first impacted by RTW which would reduce representation locally (where you need it the most) thereby encouraging even more freeloaders which continues the cycle downward. Stats show weak numbers of pt'ers being involved in voting either for contracts or local officers. Until that changes pt'ers will be pooped on. When the leaders at the IBT see big numbers (interest) from pt'ers, they'll get attention. A guy named Ron Carey had that figured out years ago.That is already happening. Unfortunately, the Teamsters won't act until more states go RTW and they really see the effect in lost dues. I'm not a huge RTW supporter but I'd be in favor of it as I'm convinced that is the only way we will ever see a decent contract from the Teamsters, when they start to see significant losses in member and dues. Sad it has come to that.
I live in a RTW state and most part-timers are not in the union and have no interest in it. What are you saying,get them to join just to withdraw?
Our local officers have had many hotdog cookouts for the employees to stop by and eat and get to meet them and a big part of it was to sign part-timers up. A few joined but not many. I believe that most p-t's don't think they need the union and think why pay dues when you don't have to.I didnt realize membership was that low in RTW states. Perhaps the union should be giving part-timers more incentive to choose union. As they give full-timers enough incentive as I hear they still have a decent membership among FTers even in those RTW states
Todays pt'ers are tomorrows full timers. Pt'ers have more avenues into FT now than ever before. I've been around awhile and in no prior contract has there been stronger language than now to advance pt'ers. The lousy fact is the economy is moving pretty slow and competition is up. Fedex gets by with cheaper labor and low bennys and busterbrown has to compete with that. No doubt pt'ers are getting the short straw but wanting ft'ers to give back may harm you in the long run.BTW, what's your solution because you are never going to see massive union involvement from part timers. Most of us have to work 2 jobs just to make it which doesn't leave us free time to organize any kind of movement and the rest are students or those who working temporarily and just don't care. The way it is set up now the Teamsters will never help us, I believe only when forced by the loss of dues & members will they then actually have to compete for members by offering a decent contract like they do for full time members.
The only thing loss of membership through RTW legislation would produce is less negotiation power resulting in pay and work conditions even lesser than what exists today. Locals would be the first impacted by RTW which would reduce representation locally (where you need it the most) thereby encouraging even more freeloaders which continues the cycle downward. Stats show weak numbers of pt'ers being involved in voting either for contracts or local officers. Until that changes pt'ers will be pooped on. When the leaders at the IBT see big numbers (interest) from pt'ers, they'll get attention. A guy named Ron Carey had that figured out years ago.
1:Todays pt'ers are tomorrows full timers. Pt'ers have more avenues into FT now than ever before. I've been around awhile and in no prior contract has there been stronger language than now to advance pt'ers. The lousy fact is the economy is moving pretty slow and competition is up.
2:Fedex gets by with cheaper labor.
FedEx pays an average of $18.50 less per hour in wages and benefits for full timers. Obviously UPS costs are much lower for pt's but benny's (when eligible) aren't insignificant. CEO pay isn't a union issue.1:You just created a paradox. We have more avenues, but at the same time the economy is slow and there aren't ft positions. lol good argument. And if you look at how ups has been doing they have been making much more money in the last year or 2. I read on a different thread the CEO gave himself a nice 70 some percent raise to a bit over 10 mil last year.
2: Fedex pays more, and I'm not quite sure how paying out for benefits works for UPS, but I'd have to imagine all the pters without families insured are getting the short end of the stick, which is most of the pters. Like I just stated in my other post, in NJ the starting wage is 1.25 over min wage, and its about to be EQUIVILENT to min wage come a few more months.
I'm not afraid to work for my money, but I also don't think it's worth me waiting till i have 5-7 years of seniority before i can finally get a decent paying job.