What do you think about NATO?

Sportello

Well-Known Member
@FrigidFTSup: right on Bosnia, wrong on science
You're talking about radioactive half life. I'm talking about biological. Biological is what matters when discussing half life in humans. If you believe science.

Look at the links on that google search. You show me one site that is reputable.
Take out the first three and you have a decent source. I didn't look at Rense or TruthOut or MintPress. I just used your words as search terms, which may be telling. A refined search has different results. I just searched your exact words.

I have no clue what biological half life of a radioactive mineral even means. Can you define that for me?
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
"3. The third task of the report is to justify the expansion of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization beyond Germany, a violation of the promise Ronald Reagan made to the Soviet Union’s Mikhail Gorbachev after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Expanding NATO in Eastern Europe opened up an arms market for the war industry. It made those businesses billions of dollars. New NATO members must buy Western arms that can be integrated into the NATO arsenal. These sales, which are bleeding the strained budgets of countries such as Poland, are predicated on potential hostilities with Russia. If Russia is not a threat, the arms sales plummet. War is a racket." - chris hedges

could go in a war thread too.
 

Nike

Well-Known Member
NATO started as a good idea but it really is to bloated and ultimately to US focused. I say we should dump it and stick with just the English speakers. Great Britain, Australia, Canada, New Zealand.
 

sailfish

Master of Karate and Friendship for Everyone
NATO makes Europe act like that scraggly little :censored2: that likes to start a lot of :censored2: because they have a big tough friend to back them. But it's time that friend tires of their :censored2: and leaves them standing there with their thumb in their ass surrounded by all the people they started :censored2: with.
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
"3. The third task of the report is to justify the expansion of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization beyond Germany, a violation of the promise Ronald Reagan made to the Soviet Union’s Mikhail Gorbachev after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Expanding NATO in Eastern Europe opened up an arms market for the war industry. It made those businesses billions of dollars. New NATO members must buy Western arms that can be integrated into the NATO arsenal. These sales, which are bleeding the strained budgets of countries such as Poland, are predicated on potential hostilities with Russia. If Russia is not a threat, the arms sales plummet. War is a racket." - chris hedges

could go in a war thread too.
one of your better posts though technically it was baker who made the promise probably working for bush
 

Wally

BrownCafe Innovator & King of Puns
NATO started as a good idea but it really is to bloated and ultimately to US focused. I say we should dump it and stick with just the English speakers. Great Britain, Australia, Canada, New Zealand.
The most important thing we need to insure is equal NATO funding. All NATO members need to pony up. No more of the US underwriting European socialism via paying their defense costs.
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
@FrigidFTSup: right on Bosnia, wrong on science

Take out the first three and you have a decent source. I didn't look at Rense or TruthOut or MintPress. I just used your words as search terms, which may be telling. A refined search has different results. I just searched your exact words.

I have no clue what biological half life of a radioactive mineral even means. Can you define that for me?
The biological half-life is the time it takes for a substance (e.g., drug, toxin, or radioactive material) to lose half of its biological activity or be reduced by half in the body through natural processes like metabolism, excretion, or decay. It varies depending on the substance and the organism's physiology. For example, caffeine has a biological half-life of about 5 hours in humans, meaning after 5 hours, half of it remains active in the body.
 

UnionStrong

Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
The biological half-life is the time it takes for a substance (e.g., drug, toxin, or radioactive material) to lose half of its biological activity or be reduced by half in the body through natural processes like metabolism, excretion, or decay. It varies depending on the substance and the organism's physiology. For example, caffeine has a biological half-life of about 5 hours in humans, meaning after 5 hours, half of it remains active in the body.
He’s not capable of intelligent reasoning
 
Top