1 in 4 women have abortions? Wow.

Fred's Myth

Nonhyphenated American
I’m saying that “life begins at first breath” was how Christians thought of the abortion issue pre-Reagan era radicalism.
Only ignorant Christians would buy that simpleton theory.

Genesis 2:7 requires the reader to understand the story of God creating the first human, from “the dust of the ground”, was the genesis of the human race. It wasn’t a depiction of a human birth.

Evidently I give you too much credit for having an honest, intellectual brain.
 

Box Ox

Well-Known Member

“Three Republicans on Wednesday joined Democrats in the Arizona House to vote to repeal the state's controversial 1864 ban on nearly all abortions, which was revived by a court ruling earlier this month and which only includes exceptions to save the life of the pregnant woman.

The final vote was 32-28.”

“The bill now heads to the state Senate where it could be taken up next week.”
 

BrownFlush

Woke Racist Reigning Ban King
1721437588108.png
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
Fetuses aren’t people.

Your side is going to lose on this abortion issue.

Does your birth certificate say your date of birth or the date you were conceived?
 

Fred's Myth

Nonhyphenated American
Fetuses aren’t people.

Your side is going to lose on this abortion issue.

Does your birth certificate say your date of birth or the date you were conceived?
You disagree with science, which says that a fertilized ovum is alive, with its own unique DNA, distinct from the sperm and egg donors?

The Divine Delusion incarnate!
 

sailfish

Master of Karate and Friendship for Everyone
I’m not sure I would go out of my way to make their post-murder lives any easier.
So you wouldn't stand by your principles consistently and you'd prefer people be charged extra with what you believe aren't even crimes soley for the sake of emotional appeal?
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
So you wouldn't stand by your principles consistently and you'd prefer people be charged extra with what you believe aren't even crimes soley for the sake of emotional appeal?
But public policy, and the government giving you some sort of certificate to prove your a life is more important!
 

Next Day Err

Well-Known Member
So you wouldn't stand by your principles consistently and you'd prefer people be charged extra with what you believe aren't even crimes soley for the sake of emotional appeal?
If the question was put to a referendum I would vote to change the classification to a single murder with aggravating circumstances if the murderer knew she was pregnant. Taking her life in that case deprives the woman of her choice to both live and carry the fetus to term. But in the meantime I’m not going to write my legislator.
 

Appvol

Well-Known Member
Fetuses aren’t people.

Your side is going to lose on this abortion issue.

Does your birth certificate say your date of birth or the date you were conceived?
As soon as you were conceived you start dying. Leftist people like you just think it’s ok to kill a life before it was born
 

Fred's Myth

Nonhyphenated American
The fetus is alive but has not gained personhood.
So, by denying a viable being the status of personhood, you would justify terminating that being.

Please establish the stare decisis of any government to define personhood, and what that definition is, and how it applies to viable, preborn human beings.
 
Top