1 in 4 women have abortions? Wow.

[wilberforce15]

And if you think that yours is how conservatives truly view things, then continue to run on them. I don’t believe that’s where Americans are right now and the further states like Texas, Ohio and Florida push such things, the more each will become a toss up state in the near future.

Why don't you just put stuff you want to be Constitutional into the Constitution?

Oh, you don't have enough public support for that? I see.

 

[bbsam]

Why do I single out Christian? Because butt sex among young Christian’s in order to preserve virginity is an actual thing that I know to be true. I don’t know if Muslims, Hindus, or Mormons () believe the same.

 

[wilberforce15]

“Sticking things up your butt…”

You need to indulge in more porn. That’s not a gay thing. That’s just a sex thing.

In fact, from what I understand, it’s a way many Christian girls have preserved their virginity.

Yes. Weird. But definitely a thing.

It's definitely a gay thing. If you do it, you're gay at heart.

 

[Thebrownblob]

Why do I single out Christian? Because butt sex among young Christian’s in order to preserve virginity is an actual thing that I know to be true. I don’t know if Muslims, Hindus, or Mormons () believe the same.

How do you know that? Are you in the bedroom with them?Sexual purity is pretty common in most religions really you just showed your true colors you’re just a hateful anti-Christian that’s fine you do you.

 

[bbsam]

Christian? Why do you single One religion. What does this have to do with abortion? Two people having sex only affects those two people. And their personal morality. One woman who decides to take a life affects the baby in the womb.

apples and oranges buddy nice try. Who’s getting killed in that scenario? Clearly we don’t need any amendments for something like that because the only people worry about color skin are liberals. It consumes you like a fire. Guess what I see when I see a black man and a white woman or a white woman and a black man? Two human beings alive loving each other. In the abortion scenario there’s a dead human. Keeps spinning this yarn. I live in a very red state. Guess what the ruling did in my state which has very liberal abortion laws? Nothing nothing at all. Women can still go and have an abortion and Thats most likely never going to change. Just now the federal government can keep their Nose out of it.

You’re going outside the context of the conversation for your own convenience. I didn’t bring up butt sex, Wilbur did in the context of homosexuality.

And you brought up judicial review/activism in regards to “making laws”.

 

[bbsam]

It's definitely a gay thing. If you do it, you're gay at heart.

If a guy and a girl do it it means they’re gay?

 

[Thebrownblob]

You’re going outside the context of the conversation for your own convenience. I didn’t bring up butt sex, Wilbur did in the context of homosexuality.

And you brought up judicial review/activism in regards to “making laws”.

I asked you why you said something that is part of the conversation once again you’re spinning. It’s pretty important to the context of what you’re saying.

 

[Thebrownblob]

You’re going outside the context of the conversation for your own convenience. I didn’t bring up butt sex, Wilbur did in the context of homosexuality.

And you brought up judicial review/activism in regards to “making laws”.

I said judicial supremacy. The courts don’t make law they rule and make decisions on it. There is no codified law for abortion. Yet liberals keep keep pretending there is.

 

[bbsam]

I said judicial supremacy. The courts don’t make law they rule and make decisions on it. There is no codified law for abortion. Yet liberals keep keep pretending there is.

You need to brush up on the history of judicial review. It’s literally as old as the founders themselves.

 

[bbsam]

I asked you why you said something that is part of the conversation once again you’re spinning. It’s pretty important to the context of what you’re saying.

Again. I didn’t bring up butt sex. Wilbur did. And incorrectly.

 

[Thebrownblob]

Again. I didn’t bring up butt sex. Wilbur did. And incorrectly.

No you made a statement about it. Incorrectly and with assumption.

 

[Thebrownblob]

You need to brush up on the history of judicial review. It’s literally as old as the founders themselves.

You might want to brush up yourself because you have no idea what you’re talking about, what Supreme Court did was put the decisions right back where they belong to the states. Keep spinning

 

[wilberforce15]

If a guy and a girl do it it means they’re gay?

View attachment 389606

Yes. Because the anus is the same part on a man and a woman. It's gay, but in denial.

 

[bbsam]

Yes. Because the anus is the same part on a man and a woman. It's gay, but in denial.

Lol. Do us a favor and make that part of the Republican platform going forward.

 

[wilberforce15]

Lol. Do us a favor and make that part of the Republican platform going forward.

Republicans are equally on board with gay nonsense. That's why you guys don't realize how much you've won. There is no legislative appetite among Republicans for defining marriage properly or anything else.

Thomas is alone.

 

[bbsam]

You might want to brush up yourself because you have no idea what you’re talking about, what Supreme Court did was put the decisions right back where they belong to the states. Keep spinning

Republicans are equally on board with gay nonsense. That's why you guys don't realize how much you've won. There is no legislative appetite among Republicans for defining marriage properly or anything else.

Thomas is alone.

No he isn’t. There are many fronts to the culture war and many people didn’t take it seriously. The far right did and does.

 

[wilberforce15]

No he isn’t. There are many fronts to the culture war and many people didn’t take it seriously. The far right did and does.

The far right has no representation. There is nobody in congress fighting gay marriage or any other liberal degeneracy.

I wish there were.

 

[bacha29]

We are in agreement.
It's a human baby.
You support murdering them when they're in the womb.

And you are completely willing to allow them to die outside the womb due to neglect, abandonment, malnutrition, disease and violence. And yet you place yourself on the throne of morality and self righteousness.

 

[wilberforce15]

And you are completely willing to allow them to die outside the womb due to neglect, abandonment, malnutrition, disease and violence. And yet you place yourself on the throne of morality and self righteousness.

Nobody is. Evangelicals adopt more than anyone. And every poor mom has access to everything she needs to raise a baby.

 

[Thebrownblob]

This ruling is much ado about nothing. Abortion isn’t going anywhere possibly some different rules state by state, and yours and my feelings about it really are inconsequential. Roe v. Wade was already getting ignored by many states before this. And that’s what states should do with bad rulings, just ignore them.