As far as I know, no one denied that authorities were present. My statement was that one could not tell who was who, because you can't. In other words the video is basically worthless and proves nothing.
LOL. Texan, having authorities in a place gives a good start for whatever on the investigation, and the video might not prove anything, but it’s very useful, and it also brings witnesses to the investigation. But, as I’ve told you: It’s still under investigation. You seem to be heck of a good detective.
Nice try on the edit there, what you said was "Hey Cowboy, this is why I say we need flawless written laws," which is the very same thing as, flawless laws need to be written. LOL. I love YOUR editing, Cowboy. Really, you need to read and think that sentence over and over and over again. “Flawless WRITTEN laws.” It’s not the same as “Writing Flawless Laws.” I told you already not to say it’s the same.
This brings me back to my point that people are flawed and a lot of what they do are flawed.Good point. That’s why we need flawless written laws; that are precise on their purpose. Good point Cowboy. I still don't see the flaws that you are so afraid of. LOL, haven’t you seen them? I thought you have read the law, already.
We can demand anything we want, does not mean it will or even can happen. Sure, it would be wonderful if all law writers were perfect, the first time, every time. And it would be nice if I had a head full of hair, but neither is likely to happen, regardless.
Cowboy, as my friend Vince Lombardi once said: “Perfection is not attainable, but if we chase perfection we can catch excellence.” I know you won’t be able to catch the point.
You've made a lot of claims sure as this, but I still don't know exactly what the mistakes are. Would you care to post a C&P if the parts you believe to be mistakes and explain why you believe that?
Man, just google SB1070 or go to the azleg website. And start reading. You’d be able to see how absurd it is what it has been written. I think a high school student would do a better writing than that. Well, I’m not sure if you can see the absurdity, but just give it a try and start reading the law. There are mistakes of every kind.
Please tell me why you believe most opponents of this law are truly opposed?
Please don’t tell me it’s not a controversial bill. PLEASE. And please don’t tell me something political.
Are you trying to read between the lines again? I've already warned you that doing so can cause you brain damage.
Really, Cowboy, and hair loss, too? Thanks for the advice.
I said beating someone to death is NOT justified. Offering a explanation why something happened is not showing justification. If someone cuts you off in traffic and you get pissedWHAT?, does that justify why you flipped them off or does it merely explain why you did so?
The reason I said he was partially responsible is because, if he had not taken down the agents (as stated in the coroner's report) they would have had no reason to apply more force. If he had not been in the US illegally, they would not have even talked to him. How can you not see Anastasio Hernandez Rojas, was partially responsible for his own death. This is pure simple logic.
LOL. You’re spinning in the same wheel like a little hamster. I still don’t see your claims as a justification or if those arguments make Anastasio Hernandez(RIP) liable for his own death. May be if you got evidence of some kind or something you could talk about him being responsible. But those arguments you give don’t’ have any foundations to what you’re claiming for his liability of his death. We better sit back, and let the proffesionals do their jobs. They’ll determine the details.
Again, I never said anyone deserved to be beaten to death, in fact I said the exact opposite.
Did you read the coroner's report?
Cause of Death: Anoxic encephalopathy (brain damage due to lack of oxygen)due to: Resuscitated cardiac arrest (cessation of normal circulation)d/t acute myocardial infarct (heart attack)due to: Hypertensive cardiomyopathy, acute methamphetamine intoxication, and physical altercation with law enforcement officers
In short,(IMO) because he started fighting with the agents (as they were turning him loose)and was tazed , he had a heart attack and died.Also, the coroner's report didn't say any thing about signs of a beating.That’s why it is still under INVESTIGATION. Besides you’ve been talking about aggressive behavior and force, and electrice shocks and everything, and that that could have caused the death. Of course they won’t put Beaten to Death on the report, come on, Cowboy. You’re changing your mind, and you’ve be changing your statements, and you will change them in the future if you keep talking about this incident because it still is under INVESTIGATION.
At my first post about this I was being sarcastic saying: “Please don’t say he was being revived with electric shocks.” I never thought he was being revived with tasers… Is it still ruled a homicide, Cowboy? I haven’t make any comments about the death, since it’s still under investigation. Go ahead, Cowboy, you’re a good detective.
