trplnkl
555
It’s only new in the use for illegal status because until now there were no state laws regarding this situation.What is new is that the term “Reasonable Suspicion” is used to determine the illegal status of a person.
I never once said that the term reasonable suspicion was articulated in the law, I don’t agree with you that it is vague and ambiguous. It is a legal term. All LEOs are well trained in the use of the term as are Judges and lawyers. Not many officers will abuse reasonable suspicion when they know that abuse will be exposed and thrown out of court the first day.Wow, I never thought you could agree with me that a law that targets people doesn’t articulate the term “Reasonable Suspicion.” Then, you should now agree that it is a vague and ambiguous law. Cowboy, the training of an officer doesn’t matter much in a court if the law doesn’t articulate its meanings. Police officers have been trained for Reasonable Suspicion way before this law was written. I know that you trust in our officers, and believe they do their jobs correctly, and all that. But, what matters is what is written, not how you guess things will be done. Now, that you’re talking about the training and you seem to know much about it, can you tell me how the “Posse” are trained or how they will be trained. Or if the “Posse” will continue to target illegals at all?
I do “cautiously” trust in our officers of the law and their training. I also believe that the vast majority do their jobs correctly and mostly effectively.
I’m not a trained LEO, are you? I don’t know all the ins and outs of applying a law and conducting an investigation. I do have ideas how it would be enforced and have posted them already. You’re welcome to look them up if you like. I would think that a person’s illegal status could be determined in two basic ways. One, could be that the suspect admits they are undocumented(illegal) or, two their status is verified through I.C.E.Now, with this definition, I’ll ask you once again, how you think this “Reasonable Suspicion” applies to “Reasonable Suspicion” to believe the individual is an illegal immigrant? As you’ve said the meaning is “somewhat” binding, and yet it is subjective on the officer’s opinion. Then, how in the world can you use it to determine the illegal status of a person? “Because the person didn’t show an ID.” “Because of the training of the officer” Don’t you think that a law that targets people must articulate its terms? Terms that are SUBJECTIVE like “Reasonable Suspicion” allow the officer to racial profile when determining the illegal status of a person.