Arizona's anti-imigration law...
- Thread starter Lue C Fur
- Start date
KingofBrown
Well-Known Member
Me? Never. Nah nah. But, if you dare me to walk without a driving license I'll take it.
klein
Für Meno :)
Done it before, even the whole day in a UPS truck.
Got caught once, back in the 90's.
Was a $50 fine back then.
What do they do in the states ?
Our cops have onboard computers... they have your file, your pic, etc...
If you lose your Driver's licence here or it expires, you actually just get a replacement piece of paper with no photo (which I only had, when I applied at UPS.
Because, they came out with new secure DL's, and you no longer can get it within the day.
It's all good enough these days.
av8torntn
Well-Known Member
This is a very bad ruling for Obama. Possibly the least desirable outcome they could have imagined. The Obama administration will now be blamed for every crime an illegal immigrant commits, not to mention the hospital troubles, and the troubles they create in the local educational systems. If the law were allowed to have been enacted and then overturned this would have given the administration some outs and at least some "victims" to point to. Politically this is a huge loss for Obama.
Now the fun begins. Will people sue for states enforcement of bankruptcy laws? Also I think we will see multiple states now enact Arizona type laws just to ensure the issue makes the Supreme Court.
tieguy
Banned
if so then the judge did not give any injunctions since there werent any parts that were racist.
Lue C Fur
Evil member
Lue C Fur
Evil member
KingofBrown
Well-Known Member
av8torntn
Well-Known Member
Better?????
834b. (a) Every law enforcement agency in California shall fully
cooperate with the United States Immigration and Naturalization
Service regarding any person who is arrested if he or she is
suspected of being present in the United States in violation of
federal immigration laws.
(b) With respect to any such person who is arrested, and suspected
of being present in the United States in violation of federal
immigration laws, every law enforcement agency shall do the
following:
(1) Attempt to verify the legal status of such person as a citizen
of the United States, an alien lawfully admitted as a permanent
resident, an alien lawfully admitted for a temporary period of time
or as an alien who is present in the United States in violation of
immigration laws. The verification process may include, but shall not
be limited to, questioning the person regarding his or her date and
place of birth, and entry into the United States, and demanding
documentation to indicate his or her legal status.
(2) Notify the person of his or her apparent status as an alien
who is present in the United States in violation of federal
immigration laws and inform him or her that, apart from any criminal
justice proceedings, he or she must either obtain legal status or
leave the United States.
(3) Notify the Attorney General of California and the United
States Immigration and Naturalization Service of the apparent illegal
status and provide any additional information that may be requested
by any other public entity.
(c) Any legislative, administrative, or other action by a city,
county, or other legally authorized local governmental entity with
jurisdictional boundaries, or by a law enforcement agency, to prevent
or limit the cooperation required by subdivision (a) is expressly
prohibited.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/webl...may/23/how-california-killed-penal-code-834b/
"All inmates booked into Orange County jails will have their immigration status checked through a fingerprint identification program that started Tuesday."
"Orange County joins 11 other California counties -- including Los Angeles, San Diego and Ventura -- that have started checking the status of inmates against a federal database as part of a national program to identify and deport undocumented immigrants who land in jail."
834b. (a) Every law enforcement agency in California shall fully
cooperate with the United States Immigration and Naturalization
Service regarding any person who is arrested if he or she is
suspected of being present in the United States in violation of
federal immigration laws.
(b) With respect to any such person who is arrested, and suspected
of being present in the United States in violation of federal
immigration laws, every law enforcement agency shall do the
following:
(1) Attempt to verify the legal status of such person as a citizen
of the United States, an alien lawfully admitted as a permanent
resident, an alien lawfully admitted for a temporary period of time
or as an alien who is present in the United States in violation of
immigration laws. The verification process may include, but shall not
be limited to, questioning the person regarding his or her date and
place of birth, and entry into the United States, and demanding
documentation to indicate his or her legal status.
(2) Notify the person of his or her apparent status as an alien
who is present in the United States in violation of federal
immigration laws and inform him or her that, apart from any criminal
justice proceedings, he or she must either obtain legal status or
leave the United States.
(3) Notify the Attorney General of California and the United
States Immigration and Naturalization Service of the apparent illegal
status and provide any additional information that may be requested
by any other public entity.
(c) Any legislative, administrative, or other action by a city,
county, or other legally authorized local governmental entity with
jurisdictional boundaries, or by a law enforcement agency, to prevent
or limit the cooperation required by subdivision (a) is expressly
prohibited.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/webl...may/23/how-california-killed-penal-code-834b/
"All inmates booked into Orange County jails will have their immigration status checked through a fingerprint identification program that started Tuesday."
"Orange County joins 11 other California counties -- including Los Angeles, San Diego and Ventura -- that have started checking the status of inmates against a federal database as part of a national program to identify and deport undocumented immigrants who land in jail."
OH, yes protect us, protect us! They're coming to get little ol' us! Help, help, the dastardly illegals are coming! Save us Mr. President!
moreluck
golden ticket member
Don't try to belittle the problem.......remember the couple killed by gunfire in their car with the baby in a carseat in back, who survived? They were just going to a b-day party. Real funny!
this too http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/lt_drug_war_nogales
this too http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/lt_drug_war_nogales
I'm not kidding. You're trying to make a national tragedy into a political weapon against Obama. When we get serious about securing the border and paying for it with blood and treasure, we might get somewhere. Until then, both parties can bathe in the blood of our citizens knowing that the problem is solveable, the politics is not.
KingofBrown
Well-Known Member
- Violent crime rates have risen under Arpaio’s watch while they have fallen throughout the rest of Arizona.
- Arpaio’s department has not served over 40,000 felony warrants.
- Arpaio has been suspected of misspending $50 million in taxpayer funds and refused to turn over his records for an investigation.
- Over 2,700 lawsuits have been filed against Arpaio. (What the heck!? I thought they were 270, damn!)
- Evidence exists that Arpaio forced an undocumented mother to give birth while handcuffed to a bed.
- And many many more on the link provided.
Last edited:
tieguy
Banned
Last edited:
Babagounj
Strength through joy
Bed-Wetting Lefty of the Day…
Fun fact: He’s actually crying because the cop told him he’d be out of jail in only two hours, crushing his dreams of being a jailhouse bitch..
Fun fact: He’s actually crying because the cop told him he’d be out of jail in only two hours, crushing his dreams of being a jailhouse bitch..
A demonstrator cries as he is arrested during a protest against Arizona’s controversial Senate Bill 1070 immigration law outside Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s office in Phoenix July 29, 2010. (Reuters)
Babagounj
Strength through joy
Immigration protesters try to close Tucson freeway with tar, tires
Traffic on Interstate 19 was briefly disrupted south of Ajo Way this morning after a group of protesters placed tar and tires on the highway.
A group calling itself “Freedom for Arizona” said it planned to cover the southbound lanes of I-19 with tires covered in tar and broken glass to shut down “the very road that is used to deport people deemed ‘illegal’ as well as a direct disruption of the flow of capital,” the group said in a news release.
Law enforcement officials have cleaned up the tires and reopened the interstate, according to the Department of Public Safety.
Traffic on Interstate 19 was briefly disrupted south of Ajo Way this morning after a group of protesters placed tar and tires on the highway.
A group calling itself “Freedom for Arizona” said it planned to cover the southbound lanes of I-19 with tires covered in tar and broken glass to shut down “the very road that is used to deport people deemed ‘illegal’ as well as a direct disruption of the flow of capital,” the group said in a news release.
Law enforcement officials have cleaned up the tires and reopened the interstate, according to the Department of Public Safety.
Babagounj
Strength through joy
54% Favor Justice Department Action Against Sanctuary Cities
Fifty-four percent (54%) of U.S. voters say the Justice Department should take legal action against cities that provide sanctuary for illegal immigrants. Even more think the federal government should cut off funds to these “sanctuary cities.”
A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that just 30% say the federal government should not take legal action against cities that offer illegal immigrants various forms of sanctuary. Fifteen percent (15%) more are not sure.
The findings are in sharp contrast to voter attitudes about the Justice Department’s decision to challenge a new law in Arizona that attempts to help enforce federal immigration law. Fifty-six percent (56%) oppose the Justice Department’s decision to challenge the legality of Arizona’s new immigration law in federal court. Sixty-one percent (61%), in fact, favor passage of a law like Arizona’s in their own state.
Fifty-four percent (54%) of U.S. voters say the Justice Department should take legal action against cities that provide sanctuary for illegal immigrants. Even more think the federal government should cut off funds to these “sanctuary cities.”
A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that just 30% say the federal government should not take legal action against cities that offer illegal immigrants various forms of sanctuary. Fifteen percent (15%) more are not sure.
The findings are in sharp contrast to voter attitudes about the Justice Department’s decision to challenge a new law in Arizona that attempts to help enforce federal immigration law. Fifty-six percent (56%) oppose the Justice Department’s decision to challenge the legality of Arizona’s new immigration law in federal court. Sixty-one percent (61%), in fact, favor passage of a law like Arizona’s in their own state.
